Apple
Search Result
Firm
user
셀스마트 판다
·
5 days ago
0
0
Nvidia Breaks $4 Trillion—And Flashes a Rare Triple Signal
Nvidia Flashes Three Simultaneous Bullish Signals A $4T milestone backed by a rare technical convergenceOn July 9, 2025, Nvidia (NVDA) sent a clear message to markets: not only did it become the most valuable public company in the world—it also triggered three major technical signals on the same day: •     Demarker(14) broke above 0.7•     Donchian(20) closed above the 20-day high•     CMO (Chande Momentum Oscillator) crossed above 50Each of these indicators alone suggests upside potential. But when they fire together, the story shifts: we’re not just seeing a short-term rally—we may be watching a new trend take hold.From Deepseek Fears to Global No.1Just months ago, Nvidia’s stock was under pressure. Fears of reduced AI capex (sparked by Deepseek) and renewed U.S.-China trade tensions weighed heavily. Now, Nvidia has touched an unprecedented $4 trillion in market cap—becoming the first to do so in history.While headlines focused on Nvidia overtaking Apple and Microsoft, what’s equally notable is the technical picture forming beneath that surge. Demarker(14) > 0.7Entering the overbought zoneThis indicator measures buying pressure by comparing recent highs and lows. While a reading above 0.7 is traditionally seen as “overbought,” Nvidia’s recent price behavior suggests strength, not fragility.Recent triggers: July 9, June 24, June 17Avg. return 1 month after trigger: +6.3%Top 25% outcomes: +13.5%Bottom 25%: -2.9%Win rate: 69.9%   Donchian(20) BreakoutBreaking the one-month highThis trend-following indicator signals when price closes above the highest point of the past 20 days. It often marks the point where even conservative, late-entry traders begin participating.•     Recent triggers: July 9, July 3, June 24•     Avg. return 1 month after trigger: +5.3%•     Top 25%: +11.9%•     Bottom 25%: -1.7%•     Win rate: 68.1% CMO > 50Momentum turning bullishCMO compares the strength of up days versus down days. A break above 50 typically suggests a shift toward upward momentum.•     Recent triggers: July 9, July 7, June 26•     Avg. return 1 month after trigger: +4.0%•     Top 25%: +10.7%•     Bottom 25%: -4.0%•     Win rate: 61.4% A Triple Convergence That MattersEach signal comes from a different angle:•     Demarker = market sentiment•     Donchian = price trend•     CMO = momentum strength When all three align on the same day, it’s not random—it’s a signal that the underlying market dynamics are synchronizing.Over the past decade, Demarker(14) > 0.7 has occurred 212 times. Its track record holds. Combine that with Donchian breakouts and momentum confirmation from CMO, and this isn’t just noise—it’s structure. Bottom Line: A Setup, Not a SpikeThis isn’t necessarily a “buy now or miss out” moment. But it may be the beginning of a new mid-term bullish cycle for Nvidia.Three signals. Three mechanisms. One direction.Technical analysis doesn’t predict the future. But when signals align, it gives you better odds—and better timing—for when to pay attention.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
NVDA
NVIDIA
user
셀스마트 판다
·
2 weeks ago
0
0
What Happened After Constellation Brands Missed Earnings?
Constellation Brands reported weaker-than-expected earnings, fueling concerns over softening alcohol demand. For the quarter ending in May, the company posted $2.52 billion in organic net sales and $3.22 in earnings per share, both slightly below analyst expectations.The beer segment, which includes six of the top 15 beer brands by dollar share in the U.S., saw sales dip 2% due to a 3.3% decline in shipment volume. Still, the company expects beer revenue to grow by up to 3% this year.Its wine and spirits division suffered more, with revenue plunging 28% year-over-year due to both restructuring and weaker consumer demand. The company has cut guidance for the segment, citing sluggish sales and the divestiture of lower-end brands.Despite the downbeat numbers, STZ stock fell just 0.7% in after-hours trading. It’s already down over 26% this year, and nearly 40% from its March peak. But some institutional investors are seeing value. Berkshire Hathaway, for instance, more than doubled its holdings in Q1 2025, now owning 6.7% of the company.Historical trends show that even when Constellation misses estimates by up to 10%, the stock has tended to bounce back modestly. On average, it returned 1.3% over the next 20 days and 0.13% over 10 days—suggesting that while the short-term reaction can be negative, it often recovers relatively quickly.Mean: +0.13%25th percentile: -2.68%75th percentile: +2.82%Mean: +1.30%25th percentile: -4.15%75th percentile: +9.09%[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Buy
Buy
STZ
Constellation Brands Class A
user
박재훈투영인
·
2 months ago
0
0
Buy the Second-Best Stock (May 14, 2025)
According to Scott Nations, president of Nations Indexes, investors should consider taking a bullish stance on Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) following a series of positive headlines surrounding the stock. Appearing on CNBC’s “Power Lunch” on Wednesday, Nations also discussed two of the day’s biggest stock stories and shared whether investors should consider buying or selling those names.Advanced Micro DevicesShares of the AI chipmaker jumped more than 4% on Wednesday after the company announced that its board had approved a $6 billion share repurchase program.Nations rated AMD a “buy,” pointing out that former President Donald Trump is reportedly planning to roll back restrictions on U.S. chip exports—something he said would be “positive for the entire sector.” He also called AMD the “second-best name” in the space, citing the company’s recent deal with Saudi firm Humain to help build out AI infrastructure, alongside Nvidia.“If you’re looking to invest in AI, this is a chance to buy at a 35% discount from its 52-week high,” Nations said. While AMD has rallied nearly 25% over the past month, it’s still down more than 2% year-to-date.AbbVieBiotech giant AbbVie saw its stock fall over 5% during Wednesday’s session.Citi downgraded the stock from Buy to Neutral and lowered its price target by $5 to $205 per share, still implying over 15% upside. Analyst Geoff Meacham noted that despite AbbVie’s track record of “consistent beats and raised guidance,” the company’s late-stage pipeline appears weak relative to peers.“Fundamentals are solid right now,” Meacham wrote in a note to clients, “but as investors increasingly focus on pipeline strength, the impact of quarterly surprises could begin to fade.”Nations disagreed strongly with that take, calling the downgrade “truly foolish” and reiterating his “buy” rating on AbbVie. “Pipeline matters for every pharma company, but AbbVie keeps beating earnings expectations, raising dividends, and offers a solid 3.5% yield. It’s in a good space,” he said. The stock is down 8% over the past three months.TeslaTesla shares climbed 4% on Wednesday after Reuters, citing sources familiar with the matter, reported that the EV maker will begin shipping components for its Cybercab and Semi truck from China to the U.S. later this month. The report came after the U.S. and China agreed earlier this week to temporarily suspend certain tariffs for 90 days.The development comes as Tesla grapples with declining sales in China and intensifying competition from local automakers. “I see Tesla as a hold right now,” Nations said. “It’s good that they’re resuming imports from China, but don’t forget: there are still some hefty tariffs on Chinese goods. In about 85 days, those could jump again—maybe even triple.”Tesla shares surged nearly 26% last week but remain down about 14% during that same period, leaving the stock still in negative territory for the year.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
TSLA
Tesla
+2
user
박재훈투영인
·
2 months ago
0
0
AI-Driven Rally? Analysts See Up to 73% Upside in Key AI Stocks (May 11, 2025)
The Big Picture: AI as the Fourth Industrial RevolutionAI has been dubbed the Fourth Industrial Revolution, expected to impact society as deeply as steam engines, electricity, and the internet once did.Daniel Ives, Senior Equity Analyst at Wedbush Securities, sees AI as the biggest tech shift in four decades. He estimates the global AI market will reach $407 billion by 2027 and $1.81 trillion by 2030, with a 36% CAGR.While AI isn't entirely new, the mainstream adoption of tools like ChatGPT sparked a wave of public and corporate interest. The development cycle of AI now includes infrastructure buildout (data centers, power systems), training on hyperscaler cloud platforms, cybersecurity, and finally, delivery to end users via software and apps.Wedbush's AI Winners: Sector Breakdown1. Semiconductors & HardwareThese companies build the computing infrastructure that supports AI data centers.Nvidia leads in supplying GPUs for both gaming and data centers, and is a key player in autonomous vehicles.AMD provides CPUs for gaming and computing and is another critical supplier.2. HyperscalersThese cloud giants provide the backbone for AI development and deployment.Microsoft: Its Office suite is integrating AI tools, while Azure is a favorite among enterprise clients.Alphabet (Google): Despite facing competition in AI search and advertising, its growing cloud segment remains under scrutiny from investors.3. Consumer InternetThese firms monetize AI through tools, automation, search optimization, and AI integration in hardware.Apple is building “Apple Intelligence” with a focus on privacy and ecosystem loyalty, though tariff concerns have weighed on its stock.Meta Platforms is improving ad targeting and developing large language models to rival ChatGPT and Gemini.4. CybersecurityCyberattacks are expected to cost companies $23 trillion by 2027.Palo Alto Networks is a prime beneficiary, with a unified platform that Wedbush sees as a key to growing market share.5. SoftwareSoftware bridges AI technology and business adoption.Palantir combines AI and big data analytics for enterprise and government clients. After a strong April, it's trading above consensus target prices.Salesforce is favored for its Agentforce platform enabling autonomous enterprise tools.IBM continues heavy AI investment to drive productivity improvements.6. Autonomous & RoboticsAI is transforming robotics and self-driving vehicles from fiction to reality.Tesla remains a high-profile name in autonomy through its Optimus robot and self-driving systems. However, its near-term EV sales outlook is weak.ConclusionAI is powering a multi-industry transformation, and leading companies are strategically positioned across the value chain—from chips and cloud to software and security. While the long-term growth potential remains massive, investors should be mindful that near-term price surges in certain names reflect high expectations. Selective, fundamentals-based exposure is essential in navigating the next phase of the AI revolution.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
AAPL
Apple
+5
user
셀스마트 앤지
·
3 months ago
0
0
Tariff Troubles: Why Tesla and NVIDIA Struggle Under Trump's Trade Policy
Trump’s renewed tariff threats have returned as a major market-moving event, rattling the share prices of key U.S. tech giants.Tesla (TSLA) has been among the hardest hit. Looking at two distinct periods — during the 2018–2019 trade war and the recent November 2024 to March 2025 phase — the stock has posted an average return of -5.8% one month after tariff announcements.NVIDIA (NVDA), a critical player in the global data center boom, also struggled, with an average return of -4.4% and a peak performance of just 1.1% after similar events, revealing its sensitivity to tariff-related risks.Surprisingly, Apple (AAPL), despite generating more than 20% of its revenue from China, has weathered tariff headlines much better, posting an average return of +0.4% and showing far less volatility than its peers.The takeaway? The companies most vulnerable to tariff shocks aren't necessarily the ones with the highest China exposure today. Both Tesla and NVIDIA have proven more reactive to tariff news than Apple, suggesting that market concerns go beyond just revenue breakdowns — growth narratives, supply chain complexities, and policy sentiment also play major roles.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
AAPL
Apple
+2
user
셀스마트 판다
·
4 months ago
0
0
NVIDIA Unveils Next-Gen AI & Semiconductor Innovations at GTC Conference (Mar 19, 2025)
NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang unveiled a host of next-generation semiconductor and AI technologies at the annual GTC (GPU Technology Conference). Through this event, NVIDIA clearly demonstrated its strategy to solidify its dominance in the AI industry, introducing a wide range of new products, including next-generation GPUs and custom processors.NVIDIA announced its next-generation GPU, Blackwell Ultra, set to launch in the second half of this year. Designed to handle large-scale AI models more efficiently, this chip features expanded memory for smoother processing. Additionally, NVIDIA introduced the Vera Rubin Computing System, scheduled for release in late 2026, and the Feynman Architecture, set to debut in 2028. These chips enhance data transfer speeds between semiconductors and support the efficient operation of scalable AI systems.NVIDIA also unveiled a new DGX AI computer for AI development. Equipped with the Blackwell Ultra chip, this device is being developed in collaboration with Dell, Lenovo, and HP, and is expected to compete with Apple’s high-performance Mac products. Furthermore, NVIDIA introduced Spectrum-X and Quantum-X networking semiconductors for AI factories, Dynamo software for optimizing AI model inference, and the GR00T N1, a foundational model for humanoid robots.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
NVDA
NVIDIA
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
The Real Concern Isn't Market Concentration—It's Overvaluation (Feb 10, 2025)
Are Mega-Cap Stocks Becoming Too Dominant?Last week, the top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 accounted for more than 37.5% of the index's total market value.Some analysts claim that the market has never been this concentrated.But history tells a different story.In fact, U.S. markets have seen even higher concentration levels in the past. The issue isn't just that a few stocks dominate—it's that their valuations may be overstretched.How worried should investors be?Younger investors have less to worry about.Unlike retirees, they have future labor income, which acts as a hedge against market downturns.Historical Market ConcentrationThe dominance of a few companies in the market is not new:In 1812, financial stocks (banks, insurance firms) made up 71% of the U.S. stock market.In 1900, railroad stocks accounted for 63% of total market value.The Pennsylvania Railroad alone made up 12% of the market, higher than Apple's 7% share today.Even lower concentration levels haven't always led to better returns:From 1965 to 1981, the top 10 stocks' share of U.S. market value dropped from 30% to 15%.Yet, market returns during this period were below long-term averages.Key takeaway:There's no "ideal" level of market concentration.Defining a clear threshold for when large-cap dominance becomes a problem is nearly impossible.The Real Risk: OvervaluationThe S&P 500 is now trading at 22x forward earnings, well above its 30-year average of 16.4x.Even after a brief pullback in tech stocks, the "Magnificent Seven" are trading at an average forward P/E of 43.3x.Higher Valuations + Rising Bond Yields = Increased RiskThe 10-year U.S. Treasury yield has surged to 4.4%, making equities relatively less attractive.Stocks are now more expensive relative to historical valuation benchmarks.Should Younger Investors Worry?A common concern from investors:"If I go all-in on stocks now, am I buying at the wrong time?"Experts—including William Bernstein, Edward McQuarrie, and Nobel Laureate William Sharpe—agree on two points:Stocks outperform bonds over the long run—but there are no guarantees.Younger investors have "human capital"—future earnings potential—which acts as a natural hedge.For younger investors:Even if stocks are overvalued, long-term earning potential provides a cushion against market downturns.Diversification into undervalued international stocks can further mitigate risk.For retirees or those near retirement:Human capital no longer acts as a hedge.TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) can protect against both stock market declines and inflation.ConclusionMarket concentration is not inherently dangerous—but overvaluation is.For young investors, the key is to stay invested, diversify globally, and accept short-term volatility as part of long-term growth.For retirees, shifting some assets into TIPS may help safeguard wealth.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
NONE
No Relevant Stock
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Warren Buffett Diverges from Market Trends: Berkshire Hathaway Continues Stock Sales (Feb 18, 2025)
Despite the S&P 500 gaining 25% in 2024 and an additional 4% increase in 2025, Berkshire Hathaway remains a net seller in the market. Buffett, managing Berkshire’s $300 billion equity portfolio, has shown little enthusiasm for the soaring stock market.For Buffett to re-enter the market, a significant sell-off may be required, but few expect such a downturn in 2025. Buffett, now 94 years old, will turn 95 in August and mark his 60th anniversary as Berkshire’s CEO in 2025.Key Portfolio Changes & Market ImpactQ4 2024: Berkshire had $6 billion in net stock sales, slowing from $127 billion in net sales in the first three quarters of 2024.Major Stock Sales in 2024Apple: Sold $110 billion worth of shares, reducing its stake by two-thirds to 300 million shares ($73 billion value).Bank of America: Sold $14 billion in shares.Citigroup: Sold $3 billion, reducing its stake to $1 billion.Major Purchases in 2024Chubb: $7 billion investment.Occidental Petroleum: $13 billion, raising its stake to 30%.Constellation Brands (alcohol producer): $1 billion investment.Missed Market GainsApple sale price: ~$185/share → Current price: $244/share, leading to an estimated $35 billion in missed gains.Bank of America sale price: ~$40/share → Current price: $47/share.Strategic Positioning & Market SentimentDespite underperforming in short-term trades, Buffett has historically positioned Berkshire against market bubbles, including the 1990s dot-com boom, where he was ultimately proven right.Berkshire’s cash reserves hit $310 billion as of Q3 2024, likely higher by year-end due to continued stock sales.Berkshire Class A shares rose 6.5% YTD, outperforming the S&P 500 by 2 percentage points.While some criticize Buffett’s timing, long-term investors remain confident in his conservative approach, especially given Berkshire’s ability to deploy massive capital during market downturns.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
BRK.B
Berkshire Hathaway Class B
+1
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Goldman Sachs Report: Magnificent 7 Decline and 2025 S&P 500 Target Cut (Mar 11, 2025)
Goldman Sachs has revised its 2025 S&P 500 target downward, citing weakness in the Magnificent 7 (Mag 7), economic uncertainty, and policy risks.1. Magnificent 7: From Dominance to Decline?Past Performance (2023):Mag 7 contributed to over half of the S&P 500’s 25% annual return, driving market gains.Current Crisis (March 2025):Mag 7 plunged 14% in three weeks, triggering a broader S&P 500 decline.Some analysts have started calling them the "Maleficent 7."Key Factors Behind the Decline:Policy Uncertainty: Potential tariff hikes are dampening investor confidence.Economic Slowdown Concerns: Growth forecasts are weakening, adding to investor anxiety.Hedge Fund Unwinding: Heavy long positions in Mag 7 are being liquidated, accelerating the sell-off.Market Implications:A market heavily reliant on a few large-cap tech stocks is vulnerable to volatility.Investors may need to diversify away from Mag 7 to reduce risk exposure.2. S&P 500 2025 Target CutGoldman Sachs now targets 6,200 for year-end 2025, down from 6,500 (-4%).Reasons for the Revision:Lower P/E Ratio Assumption:Cut from 21.5x to 20.6x amid heightened risk.Reduced EPS Growth Forecast:2025 EPS growth outlook cut from 9% to 7% (2026 remains at 7%).Macroeconomic Backdrop:U.S. GDP Growth Slowing: Goldman’s economic team revised growth projections downward.Tariff Increases Expected: Rising tariffs could erode corporate earnings.Higher Uncertainty: Political and economic risks are raising the equity risk premium.Supporting Data:Despite the cut, the new target still suggests an 11% upside from current levels.Goldman now forecasts 2025 EPS at $262 and 2026 EPS at $280, below consensus estimates.3. Additional ConsiderationsImpact of Tariffs:A 5% tariff increase could reduce S&P 500 EPS by 1-2%, assuming firms pass most costs to consumers.Market Risk Indicators:The Economic Policy Uncertainty Index has surged.The spread between S&P 500 earnings yield and real 10-year Treasury yield has widened.ConclusionThe decline of Mag 7 and the S&P 500 target cut reflect Goldman Sachs' cautious stance on U.S. equities.Rising policy risks, slowing growth, and increased volatility signal a more uncertain market environment.Investors should focus on risk management and portfolio diversification in response to these shifts.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
AAPL
Apple
+6
user
셀스마트 앤지
·
4 months ago
0
0
Morgan Stanley Lowers Apple Price Target Amid AI Delays & Tariff Concerns (Mar 12, 2025)
Apple (AAPL) shares have come under pressure recently due to AI feature delays and tariff burdens. Morgan Stanley analyst Erik Woodring maintained an Overweight (Buy) rating on Apple but lowered the price target from $275 to $252.Key Reasons for Target CutAI-Enhanced Siri Delayed:Woodring highlighted that delays in the AI-upgraded Siri could negatively impact iPhone sales, as AI improvements are among the most anticipated upgrades.Apple’s stock declined for three consecutive sessions following news of the Siri delay.Lower iPhone Shipment Estimates:Woodring trimmed 2025 and 2026 iPhone shipment forecasts by 1-5%,Predicting iPhone shipments will reach approximately 230 million units in 2025.Tariff Concerns:U.S. import tariffs are another headwind for Apple, potentially impacting profitability.Despite these short-term challenges, Woodring maintained a Buy rating, citing Apple’s long-term strengths. However, he acknowledged that the AI delay and trade issues justify a price target reduction to $252.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
AAPL
Apple
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Samsung, Are You Listening? “AI Is Booming, but It’s Ultimately in Taiwan’s Hands?” (Oct 31, 2024)
At 35, Harvard graduate Jung Yoon-seok had his pick of locations across Asia—including his home country of South Korea—to manufacture AI chips for his startup, Rebellions. Yet, he chose Taiwan. “Taiwan is small, and Taipei is even smaller, but everything moves incredibly fast there,” he says.And Jung is not alone. AI leaders like NVIDIA, Microsoft, and OpenAI are all focusing on Taiwan. They rely on Taiwanese firms to manufacture AI chips, build servers, and develop cooling systems. As a result, Taiwan’s stock market has been the hottest in Asia over the past year, led by TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company) and Hon Hai (Foxconn).Some investors believe this $400 billion rally is just the beginning. Optimists argue that Taiwan has become the ChatGPT era’s core manufacturing hub, making it a key beneficiary of the AI boom.Former U.S. Commerce Department official Sean King puts it bluntly: “Taiwan is the engine that drives AI.”However, this success comes with risks. For the first time in decades, the global tech supply chain is shifting away from China—and instead, towards its smaller neighbor. As U.S.-China tensions escalate, many AI companies are reluctant to manufacture in China, giving Taiwan a strategic advantage. However, as Taiwan’s global significance grows, so does Beijing’s interest in reclaiming what it sees as “separated territory.”TSMC: The King of AI Chip ManufacturingTSMC is at the heart of Taiwan’s success story. As competitors Intel and Samsung struggle, TSMC has tightened its grip on the semiconductor industry, dominating the production of the world’s most advanced chips. Even NVIDIA’s CEO, Jensen Huang, acknowledges that only TSMC can manufacture its AI accelerators.But Taiwan’s AI dominance isn’t limited to TSMC. Several hidden champions play crucial roles in AI development:Quanta Computer – A key server manufacturerDelta Electronics – A leading power equipment providerAsia Vital Components (AVC) – A pioneer in computer cooling systemsThese companies are expected to thrive in the AI market, which is projected to reach $1.3 trillion by 2032.Edward Chen, chairman of First Capital Management, believes Taiwan’s AI boom will last longer than previous tech cycles. With TSMC playing a key role in choosing partners for firms like NVIDIA, he argues that Taiwan’s technology sector is reaching an entirely new level.Taiwan’s stock market performance reflects this shift. The Taiex Index has soared over 40% in the past year, far outpacing China, Hong Kong, India, and Japan.How Taiwan Became the AI Manufacturing HubTaiwan’s rise as a tech powerhouse dates back to the 1980s, when Japanese firms began outsourcing low-cost plastic toy manufacturing to Taiwan. As the economy grew, Taiwanese companies evolved into high-tech manufacturers. While some firms set up factories in China, they always kept their most advanced technologies at home.Meanwhile, U.S. trade restrictions on China have forced companies to seek alternatives, effectively pushing China out of key supply chains. In less than two years, China’s AI hardware industry has been virtually crippled.The numbers tell the story: In the first nine months of 2024, Taiwan exported more than twice the number of AI servers and GPUs as China—an unimaginable shift from just a few years ago.Why Tech Giants Are Rushing to Taiwan"Look at today’s cloud giants," says a tech analyst. "Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and Google are all racing to catch up with ChatGPT, and they all rely on Taiwanese firms to build their servers."Market research firm IDC predicts that global spending on AI systems and services will more than double to $632 billion by 2028.Liu Fei-chen, a researcher at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research, describes Taiwan as a “one-stop shop” for AI hardware. Companies can source everything they need without leaving the island.Put simply, Taiwan is the gateway to the AI-driven future—where global IT firms’ dreams become reality through Taiwanese technology.The Secrets of Taiwan’s SuccessWhat makes Taiwan’s tech firms so attractive to global giants like Amazon, NVIDIA, and Apple?Customer-First MentalityDuring the pandemic, TSMC had the perfect opportunity to raise chip prices but instead chose to minimize price hikes to maintain trust with customers.This “strategic, not opportunistic” approach solidified its reputation as a reliable partner.Adaptability & Quick TransformationFoxconn (Hon Hai) and Quanta were once known for assembling iPhones and MacBooks.Today, they prioritize AI server orders, proving their ability to shift with market trends.Aggressive Investment in the FutureCompanies like AVC, Delta, and Quanta allocate nearly half of their operating expenses to R&D.They are also expanding beyond Taiwan, with AVC investing $450 million in a new Vietnamese plant.Taiwan’s three-pillar strategy—customer trust, adaptability, and aggressive investment—has created an unstoppable AI powerhouse.AI’s Explosive Growth & Taiwan’s RoleAI demand is skyrocketing, but so are the challenges. NVIDIA’s latest AI server, the NVL72, costs a staggering $3 million per unit and generates extreme heat—a major technical challenge.Companies like Delta and AVC are now scrambling to develop cooling systems that can handle this unprecedented power consumption.Rodrigo Liang, CEO of Silicon Valley-based AI chip startup SambaNova Systems, highlights Taiwan’s geographic advantage:“If a startup founder flies to Taiwan looking for a manufacturing partner, they can meet Delta, AVC, and Quanta all in a single afternoon. The high-speed rail gets you from Taipei to Kaohsiung in just 1.5 hours.”This tight-knit ecosystem fosters fierce competition and rapid innovation—critical factors for Taiwan’s continued AI dominance.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
TSM
TSMC
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Where Is Lee Jae-yong's Leadership? The Reality of Samsung’s Crisis (Oct 22, 2024)
Concerns over Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Jae-yong's leadership are growing both domestically and internationally. Critics argue that Samsung has failed to respond proactively in the semiconductor industry, while also facing internal inefficiencies that require urgent restructuring.Leadership Under ScrutinyLee Jae-yong marks his 2nd anniversary as chairman on October 27, but Samsung has no official plans for a statement.The company also approaches its 55th anniversary (Nov 1) and 50 years in semiconductors (Dec 6), raising speculation about future strategic directions.Despite his public appearances—such as the fourth anniversary of Samsung’s pediatric cancer support program on Oct 21—Lee has remained silent on the company's ongoing challenges.Samsung’s Mounting Crisis1. Semiconductor SetbacksFalling Behind in Foundry & Advanced Chips:TSMC dominates AI-driven demand, securing contracts with NVIDIA, Apple, AMD, and Qualcomm.Samsung’s foundry & system LSI division posted over ₩1 trillion in losses in Q3.In 2011, Samsung’s non-memory sales were 88% of TSMC’s; by 2023, this shrank to just 25%.Despite ₩15 trillion annual investments, the gap is widening.Taiwan’s Digitimes (Oct 15) stated that Samsung’s price competition strategy failed due to poor yield rates.HBM Missteps:SK Hynix leads the HBM market, securing early dominance in AI-driven memory.Samsung disbanded its HBM R&D team in 2019, now struggling to catch up.2. Stock Performance & Investor SentimentStock Price:October 21 closing price: ₩59,000 (-0.34%).Hit 52-week low amid continued foreign selling.Foreign investors dumped ₩12.6 trillion worth of Samsung shares over two months.Investor Confidence Eroding:Morgan Stanley's “Winter Looms” report forecasts a semiconductor downturn due to DRAM oversupply and HBM price declines.Macquarie downgraded Samsung to "Neutral" from "Buy".3. Inefficient Decision-Making StructureExcessive Influence of Samsung’s Business Support TF (Task Force):Led by Vice Chairman Chung Hyun-ho, this unit is criticized for slow, risk-averse decision-making.Compared to Intel’s past missteps, where middle management bottlenecks delayed crucial technology transitions.Internal Criticism & Employee Frustration:Employee forum discussions describe a rigid, top-heavy reporting structure stifling innovation and accountability.4. Lack of Bold Strategic MovesLeadership & Talent Strategy Issues:May 2024 appointment of new semiconductor chief Jeon Young-hyun was seen as too conservative.No major acquisitions or aggressive R&D initiatives have been pursued.Samsung’s Crisis = Korea’s Crisis?Samsung accounted for 18% of Korea’s total exports in 2023 (₩150 trillion out of ₩830 trillion).KDI research (2017) showed that shocks to Korea’s top 3 corporations explain 59% of macroeconomic volatility—highlighting Samsung’s systemic importance.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Sell
Sell
005930
Samsung Electronics
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Dow closes down 260 points at session low as megacap tech stocks turn negative(May 18, 2021)
Major U.S. stock indexes wiped out earlier gains and closed at their session lows on Tuesday as Big Tech stocks reversed lower, while data showing housing starts dropped sharply last month also weighed on sentiment.The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended the session 267.13 points, or 0.8%, to 34,060.66. The S&P 500 fell 0.9% to 4,127.83. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite erased a 0.8% gain and slid 0.6% to 13,303.64 as Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Alphabet all rolled over and fell more than 1% on the dayHousing starts tumbled 9.5% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.569 million units last month, the Commerce Department said on Tuesday. Economists polled by Dow Jones had forecast starts falling to a rate of 1.7 million units in April.Investors also digested better-than-expected earnings from big retailers. Walmart shares jumped more than 2% after reporting strong grocery sales and e-commerce growth for the quarter. Macy’s posted a surprise profit and hiked its full-year outlook, but its shares erased earlier gains and dipped 0.4%.Home Depot reported earnings of $3.86 a share for the previous quarter, much higher than the $3.08 expected by analysts polled by Refinitiv. Net sales surged 32.7%, more than expected. The stock ended the session 1% lower.Growth-heavy stocks have remained under pressure in recent sessions as investors fret over whether a pop in inflation will entrench or blow over as the Federal Reserve expects. Inflation above the Fed’s 2% target for a sustained period could prompt the central bank to tighten monetary policy and dampen stocks that outperform the market when interest rates are low.″Growth may be peaking, but it’s not a bull-market breaker yet,” said Lauren Goodwin, economist and portfolio strategist at New York Life Investments. “Data can’t stay at peak levels forever, and tailwinds from fiscal stimulus are likely to wind down. This can complicate the environment for investors; history suggests that when the economy starts to slow, market returns tend to slow with it.”Investors blamed that angst for the S&P 500′s dismal performance last week, which saw the broad market index fall 4% through midweek amid heightened inflation fears. The broad equity benchmark eventually rebounded and ended the week down 1.4%. All three benchmarks posted their worst week since February 26.The Fed’s minutes from its last meeting, which will be released Wednesday, could offer some clues on policymakers’ thinking on inflation.Elsewhere, the first-quarter earnings season is wrapping up with more than 90% of the S&P 500 companies having reported their results. So far, 86% of S&P 500 companies have reported a positive EPS surprise, which would mark the highest percentage of positive earnings surprises since 2008 when FactSet began tracking this metric.
article
Sell
Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
+1
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
S&P 500 Reporting YoY Decline in Net Profit Margin for 3rd Straight Qtr(Oct 21, 2019)
For the third quarter, the S&P 500 is reporting a year-over-year decline in earnings of -4.7%, but year-over-year growth in revenues of 2.6%. Given the dichotomy in growth between earnings and revenues, there are concerns in the market about net profit margins for S&P 500 companies in the third quarter. Given this concern, what is the S&P 500 reporting for a net profit margin in the third quarter?The blended net profit margin for the S&P 500 for Q3 2019 is 11.3%. If 11.3% is the actual net profit margin for the quarter, it will mark the first time the index has reported three straight quarters of year-over-year declines in net profit margin since Q1 2009 through Q3 2009. Nine of the 11 sectors are reporting a year-over-year decline in their net profit margins in Q3 2019, led by the Energy (5.4% vs. 8.1%) and Information Technology (20.6% vs. 23.0%) sectors.What is driving the year-over-year decrease in the net profit margin?One factor is a difficult year-over-year comparison. In Q3 2018, the S&P 500 reported the highest net profit margin since FactSet began tracking this data in 2008. While nine sectors are reporting a year-over-year decline in net profit margins, only one sector (Health Care) is reporting a net profit margin below its five-year average. Higher costs are likely another factor. Of the first 22 S&P 500 companies to conduct earnings calls for Q3, seven (32%) discussed a negative impact from higher wages and labor costs and five (21%) discussed a negative impact from higher raw material or other input costs. Please see our previous article on this topic.Based on current estimates, the estimated net profit margins for Q4 2019, Q1 2020, and Q2 2020 are 11.1%, 11.3%, and 11.7%. Net profit margins are expected to increase on a year-over-year basis again in Q1 2020.To maintain consistency, the earnings and revenue numbers used to calculate the earnings and revenue growth rates published in this report were also used to calculate the index-level and sector-level net profit margins for this analysis. In addition, all year-over-year comparisons for Q3 2019 to Q3 2018 (and all other year-over-year comparisons for historical quarters) reflect an apples-to-apples comparison of data at the company level.
article
Sell
Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
user
박재훈투영인
·
5 months ago
0
0
Is Apple Stock (Nasdaq: AAPL) the Short of a Lifetime or the New Widow Maker?(March 27, 2012)
I have a confession to make.I believe Apple stock (Nasdaq: AAPL) is going to be world's first trillion-dollar company yet I want to short the snot out of it.Am I being compulsive?...impulsive?....or foolish?Perhaps it is all three considering that Apple has risen more than 3,000% in the last ten years, turning almost any attempt to go against the grain into a "widow maker" trade.Trump boom awakens “silent” $2 stock [Sponsored by Timothy Sykes]I say almost because I am one of the lucky ones.A few weeks ago I recommended my Strike Force subscribers purchase put options on Apple, effectively shorting the stock. That resulted in a 47% profit in less than 24 hours for anyone who followed along, excluding fees and commissions.I'm not alone in my thinking.Why Buffett, Bezos, & Congress Are Piling Into This One Sector [Sponsored by Investorplace]Uber investor Doug Kass, general partner of Seabreeze Partners Long/Short LP and Seabreeze Partners Long/Short Offshore LP, tweeted recently that he had covered "half his short" on Apple following the announcement of their dividend and buyback plan.Given that the stock had run up to nearly $608 a share before the announcement, presumably Kass had banked some gains, too.7 Reasons to Short Apple Stock(Nasdaq: AAPL)I haven't spoken with Mr. Kass so I can't comment on his current thinking nor the specifics of his trade, but here are mine:The company has single-handedly repeated the bubble curve of the Nasdaq run up. That leaves a lot of empty space to the downside.Apple is a "fad" or a "hit" company, meaning that its price seems to correlate to new product launches rather than the sustainable development of key product lines. Companies that do that tend to fall back from orbit at some point - especially in the tech world. Palm and Research in Motion (Nasdaq: RIMM) are two that come to mind.When great leaders are gone, their legacies can struggle. While Apple has stood up so far following Steve Jobs' unfortunate death, I can only wonder, as many in the tech community are wondering, how deep and how far out his thinking will live on. Is it one product cycle, two cycles? Nobody knows. But we do know that Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) became a very different company after Bill Gates stepped aside. Intel (Nasdaq: INTC) also flatlined three or four cycles after Andy Grove's departure from day-to-day operations.Apple's short interest of only 9.8 million shares is very low considering the company's three-month average daily trading volume is 18.2 million shares and the company's float is 931.8 million shares.The analyst community is almost completely positive. That's usually a sign of two things: a) that they're soft peddling opposing trades from other parts of the "shops" they work for or b) that they want a run up to maximize profits from positions they already hold. Either way, many have been tremendously wrong in their sales projections in recent quarters, understating anticipated results by as much as 30%-40% - a factor also noted by Kass in his trade set up analysis. Therefore, I am skeptical that they are raising numbers again.Apple's profit margins are unbelievably high at a time when the rest of the economy lurches along. While that's not a bad thing in isolation, I have a hard time believing that Apple can remain so far out of line if for no other reason that what goes up must come down eventually. And, since the road higher is far more unlikely for the rest of the markets, it is logical that Apple likely heads lower in the short term.Apple's fundamentals may soften. There are lots of reasons to love Apple but there are just as many reasons things may not be what they seem. If the economy worsens just how many people are going to buy "gee-whiz" technology beyond the hard core Apple-heads? Is there an Apple-killer in somebody's garage right now? Anti-trust investigations and supply problems are also big what ifs at the moment. Even a carrier failure could rock Apple because it may be their subsidies that keep Apple's costs down and profits high.Add it all up and there is enough to make you go hmmm...Of course, there is no doubt I will incur the wrath of Apple fans everywhere and arm chair traders from here to Tibet.Trump’s Shocking Exec Order 001 [Sponsored by Bayan Hill]Get over it guys; please refrain from the snarky e-mails telling me I'm an idiot or out of touch or worse - I believe in Apple. I really do.What I am suggesting is simply the logic behind Apple as a trading opportunity for nimble, aggressive and like minded market mavens.Besides, if I am correct and Apple does trade lower in the weeks ahead, I'm going to be picking up shares as an investment.
article
Sell
Sell
226490
Samsung KODEX KOSPI ETF
+2
user
박재훈투영인
·
5 months ago
0
0
So what can we learn from the Crash of 1929 to avoid a 21st Century Great Depression?(17 September 2008)
By the end of September 1929, the American stock market on New York’s Wall Street was riding the wave of a decade of intoxicating growth.The Roaring Twenties — that era of the Jazz Age, bootleggers and gangsters like Al Capone — had seen millions of ordinary Americans caught up in the excitement of owning shares, and making money.The Dow Jones Industrial Average of leading shares had grown five-fold in the previous five years.As the social historian Cecil Roberts was to put it later: ‘Everyone was playing the market. Stocks soared dizzily.'I found it hard not to be engulfed. I had invested my American earnings in good stocks.'Should I sell for a profit? Everyone said, “Hang on — it’s a rising market.”’On the last day of a visit to New York that September, Roberts went to have his hair cut.As the barber swept the clean white sheet from his shoulders and bent to brush his collar, he said softly: ‘Buy Standard Gas. I’ve doubled. It’s good for another double.’Stunned, Roberts walked upstairs and said to himself: ‘If the hysteria has reached the barber-level, something must soon happen.’ It did.On October 3, the day after Britain’s widely respected Chancellor of the Exchequer, Philip Snowden, had warned that the Americans had got themselves into a ‘speculative orgy’ on Wall Street, the New York stock market started to fall.Today, almost 80 years later, history seems to be on the verge of repeating itself — with the Dow Jones index of leading shares on Wall Street falling, followed by major stock markets around the world.Back in 1929, as October continued, so the fall in the value of stocks and shares steepened.On Monday, October 21, six million shares swapped hands, the largest number in the history of the exchange.But then, on the morning of Thursday, October 24, 1929, it went into freefall. When the New York Stock Exchange opened there were no buyers, only sellers.The Great Crash had begun. On the floor of the Exchange, there was pandemonium.Watched by none other than Winston Churchill, who was in the United States on a speaking tour and had come to see how his American investments were faring, there was ‘bedlam’ with ‘the jobbers (trying to buy or sell stocks and shares) caught in the middle’.As Selwyn Parker, author of a new book on the Crash puts it: ‘In vain attempts to be heard above the din, they were screaming orders to sell; when that did not work, they hurled their chits at the chalk girls.'Others, transfixed by the plummeting share prices, simply stood where they were in an almost catatonic state.‘What Churchill was watching,’ Parker goes on to say ‘was the collapse of the collective nerve of American shareholders.’On the street, the crowds of onlookers grew ever bigger as rumours of the falls swept New York — with thousands upon thousands of ordinary Americans fearful that they were about to lose everything.By midday police riot squads had to be called to disperse what The New York Times itself called ‘the hysterical crowds’, but they had little or no effect. Rumours spread everywhere — one was that 11 speculators had killed themselves that very morning, though it was not true.One poor workman on the roof of an office building nearby found himself watched by the crowds below — all convinced that he was about to throw himself to the street below.He didn’t, but the legend that one banker did throw himself to his death was to become one of the abiding myths of what became known as ‘Black Thursday’.Almost 13 million shares changed hands on the NYSE that day, the most that had ever done so, and yet the worst of the falls in value were recouped that same afternoon — in the wake of a rescue attempt by leading bankers who had held an emergency meeting at the offices of JP Morgan.Yet the rally didn’t last. By Monday, October 28, the sellers were back, and on Tuesday October 29, the Great Crash finally came to a dreadful conclusion in what The New York Times described as ‘the most disastrous day’ in the American stock market’s history.On that day — ‘Black Tuesday’ — losses approached £4.5 billion ( equivalent to £800 billion today), and more than 16.4million shares changed hands.No matter what the bankers, or wealthy investors like John D. Rockefeller, tried to do to stem the tide of sellers, their efforts were pointless. They were swept aside, as huge blocks of shares were sold, and confidence drained out of the market.Groups of men — ‘with here and there a woman’ in the words of one observer — stood beside the new ‘ticker-tape’ machines, which monitored the price of stocks and shares, watching as their fortunes vanished in front of their eyes.One reporter noted: ‘The crowds about the ticker-tape, like friends around the bedside of a stricken friend, reflected in their faces the story the tape was telling.There were no smiles. There were no tears either. Just the cameraderie of fellow sufferers.’ The comedian Eddie Cantor lost everything, but kept his sense of humour.‘Well, folks,’ he told his radio audience that evening, ‘they got me in the market, just like they got everybody else.'In fact, they’re not calling it the stock market any longer. They’re calling it the stuck market.'Everyone’s stuck. Well, except my uncle. He got a good break. He died in September.’Groucho Marx, star of Duck Soup and Animal Crackers, lost £400,000, while heavyweight boxer Jack Dempsey, one of the first multi-millionaire sportsmen, lost £1.5million.Even the man who was later accused of triggering the stock market boom, economist Professor Irving Fisher, lost everything.Just four months earlier, Fisher had told the readers of an article entitled Everybody Ought To Be Rich: ‘If a man saves £7.50 a week, and invests in good common stocks, and allows the dividends and rights to accumulate, at the end of 20 years he will have at least £40,000 and an income from investments of around £200 a month. He will be rich.‘And because income can do that, I am firm in my belief that anyone not only can be rich, but ought to be rich.’Small wonder that the most popular song of 1929 was Irving Berlin’s Blue Skies — with its unforgettable lines: ‘Blue skies smiling at me/Nothing but blue skies, do I see.’Millions of Americans had taken Fisher’s advice, often borrowing the money to do so. And, in another parallel with today’s financial crisis, ordinary people were encouraged to take exceptional risks — risks they did not appreciate, and which they would come to regret.Some had their doubts, but not many. One investor later recalled: I knew something was terribly wrong because I heard bellboys, everybody, talking about the stock market.’But, just like today, many of them were gulled by the slick salesmen of the investment houses and banks.As Parker explains: ‘In the five-year run up to the Crash, gullible investors borrowed wildly to get into the market, and many were systematically duped by Wall Street and the stock market fraternity at large.’After the Crash, one expert in the Department of Commerce estimated that almost half the £25 billion of stocks and shares sold in the United States during the Roaring Twenties was ‘undesirable or worthless’.But the other half clearly reflected the growing American economy — with shares in General Electric, for example, tripling in value in the 18 months before the Crash; while a £5,000 investment in General Motors in 1920 would have produced an astonishing £750,000 by 1929.By the end of 1928 most investors had come to expect incredible gains, and the presidential election campaign that November did nothing to quell the fever.Indeed, the Republican candidate Herbert Hoover, who’d been commerce secretary throughout the 1920s, took to the hustings to announce: ‘We shall soon, with the help of God, be in sight of the day when poverty will be banished from this nation.’It was to take a generation — and a World War — to see any semblance of prosperity return.The Great Crash of 1929 plunged America, and the rest of the world, into an economic depression that was to last for the next decade.As one commentator memorably explained afterwards: ‘Anyone who bought stocks in mid 1929 and held onto them saw most of his or her adult life pass by before getting back to even.’So why did the Crash — which had been precipitated by government increases in interest rates to cool off the stock market boom — turn into a depression?Simply because of the uncertainty the Crash fuelled.No one knew what consequences of the Crash were going to be — so everyone decided to stop trading until things settled down.Banks stopped lending money. Consumers stopped buying durable goods from shops.The stores, in turn, stopped buying from the manufacturers.Firms, therefore, cut back on production and laid off workers. And all of this fed on itself to make the depression still worse.In the following ten years 13 million Americans lost their jobs, with 12,000 losing their jobs every single working day.Some 20,000 companies went bankrupt, including 1,616 banks, and one in every 20 farmers was evicted from his land.In 1932, the worst year of the Great Depression which continued until the beginning of the war, an astounding 23,000 Americans committed suicide in a single year.And the pain was not restricted to the U.S.Weimar Germany, which had built its foundations in the aftermath of World War I with the help of American loans, found itself struggling with ever mounting debts.This, in turn, helped to usher in the brownshirts of Adolf Hitler’s National Socialist party.The impact on American self-confidence was devastating.As the Broadway lyricist Yip Harburg, who lived through those times, explained almost 40 years later: ‘We thought American business was the Rock of Gibraltar.'We were the prosperous nation, and nothing could stop us now. There was a feeling of continuity. If you made it, it was there for ever. Suddenly the big dream exploded’.Another writer, who lived through those days, M. A. Hamilton, said the Great Crash of 1929 shattered the dreams of millions of Americans —and that the average working man ‘found his daily facts reeling and swimming about him, in a nightmare of continuous disappointment’.‘The bottom had fallen out of the market, for good,’ wrote Hamilton. ‘And that market had a horrid connection with his bread and butter, his automobile, and his instalment purchases.'Worst of all, unemployment became a hideous fact and one that lacerated and tore at self-respect.’Suddenly, there were lines of men and women queuing up for free soup from the soup kitchens established by the Salvation Army, or provided by the wealthy men who had not been hurt financially, like the millionaire publisher William Randolph Hearst.And everywhere Americans were struggling to eke out a living.Once-successful businessmen were condemned to selling apples on street corners in New York, and, if they couldn’t afford apples, they offered to shine shoes.By the summer of 1932, according to the police, there were about 7,000 of these ‘shine boys’ making a living on New York’s streets.Just three years before they were almost non-existent and most were boys under 17.The New York Times reported ‘an army of new salesmen, peddling everything from large rubber balls to cheap neckties’, while unemployment also brought back the ‘newsboy’ (often men in their 40s) in increasing numbers.‘He avoids the busy corners, where news-stands are frequent,’ the paper explained. ‘And hawks his papers in the side streets with surprising success.'His best client is the man who is too tired to walk down to the corner for a paper’.The Great Depression was an economic apocalypse that no one could possibly wish to see happen again. But could it?There are worrying parallels. The American economist J. K. Galbraith blamed the Great Depression that followed the Crash on credit growth, as did his British counterpart, Lionel Robbins.And few doubt that it is the credit crunch — as well as the greed among bankers who took unacceptable risks with their clients’ money — that lies at the heart of the present falls in stock markets around the world.Certainly, Selwyn Parker believes this. In the past decade, he writes, ‘ somehow the banks managed to slip the regulators’ leash, distributing credit around the world like so much chaff. Casinos were better regulated than the banking industry.’The result of this credit binge, he adds, is the record levels of personal debt that we are seeing now, which leads, when things start to go wrong, ‘to general belt-tightening, fast-slowing growth and banks hoarding capital — the conditions we have right now’.‘The financial system and people’s material wealth today,’ Parker warns darkly, are much more vulnerable than anybody thought.’As stock markets fall around the world, we can only pray we are not on the brink of another economic apocalypse.But history suggests that the omens are far from good.
article
Strong Sell
Strong Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
+3
user
박재훈투영인
·
5 months ago
0
0
Why Is the Stock Market So Volatile in October?( 28 September 2021)
Over the past twenty years, market experts have observed that October tends to be the month of the year with the greatest volatility. Companies traded on the stock market tend to see the sharpest jumps and steepest drops in share value during the month of October.Some of the global economy’s most traumatic events have occurred during the tenth month of the year; from the Crash of 1929 that ushered in the Great Depression to 1987’s ‘Black Monday’, generation-defining market drops seem to be concentrated in October.When one calculates the standard deviation of daily share price gyrations since the Dow Jones Industrial Index (USA 30 - Wall Street) was created in 1896, it can be shown that volatility for the index is 38% higher than average in October. Another method of calculating monthly ups and downs on the stock market is the VIX Volatility Index (CBOE Volatility Index Futures), often referred to as the ‘Fear Index’. The VIX uses the same method used to calculate options valuations to predict expected market volatility on the S&P 500 (USA 500) for a given month. The VIX hit its record high in October 2008, during the height of the global financial crisis. Furthermore, since 1928, the S&P 500 has seen an average 8.30% difference between its closing high and low in October.In recent years, predictions of market volatility have consistently been borne out. In October of 2020, global tech giants Amazon (AMZN) and Apple (AAPL) both posted jumps in share value by over 10% while the STOXX Europe 50 index fell by 10%. The preceding October, the price of Natural Gas (NG) rose by over 25% over the course of the month. In October of 2018, both NASDAQ (NDAQ) and Oil (CL) experienced double-digit drops.Market watchers have repeatedly tried to formulate explanations for October’s reliable tumultuousness. Some theorise that the U.S. government could be influencing the market, as its fiscal year ends on October 1st, and the incoming Chairman of the Federal Reserve is announced every four years in October. Others attribute market volatility to traders’ lifestyles, as many return from their summer vacations after Labor Day and begin to make serious trades, leading to a peak in October. Further explanations connect this yearly phenomenon to mutual funds making fiscal year-end trades before Halloween, to third-quarter earnings reports, or to the U.S. election cycle. However, according to some economists, the most likely explanation is more mundane. October’s volatility may simply be the result of an underlying seasonal business cycle that tends to end in the early autumn. According to Prof. Terry Marsh of UC, Berkeley, there is a high probability that the market jumps and falls that tend to characterise the tenth month of the year could just be a data fluke, without any compelling causative factors. In conclusion, although October’s market volatility has come to be an expected seasonal occurrence in stock trading, traders may wish to stay wary of any convenient explanations for the phenomenon when making their buying and selling decisions.
article
Neutral
Neutral
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
user
박재훈투영인
·
5 months ago
0
0
Nasdaq reaches new record high, 15 years after dotcom tech surge(Apr.23.2015)
The Nasdaq index reached a record high on Thursday, topping a record set 15 years ago during the height of the dotcom tech bubble.The index had risen as much as 25 points, or 0.5%, to 5,060.14 by early afternoon, topping its all-time closing high of 5,048.62 on March 10, 2000. It ended the day at 5,056.06, up 0.41%.The Dow Jones and S&P have recorded dozens of new highs since the end of the recession. While the Nasdaq has come close to topping its former levels until Thursday, it had always fallen short.The index was the world’s first electronic stock exchange and has become the traditional home of many of tech’s biggest companies. Amazon, Apple, Cisco, Facebook, Google, Intel and Microsoft are all traded on the Nasdaq.But in recent years it has diversified its portfolio of companies, and now includes high-flying biotech stocks including Amgen and Gilead Sciences. The shift may have broadened Nasdaq’s appeal, but it is still heavily weighted to the fortunes of the tech sector. Apple, the world’s most valuable company, is Nasdaq’s largest component, and its record-breaking share price run has helped propel Nasdaq’s rise.It has taken Nasdaq 15-years to recover from the last big technology crash. On March 10, 2000, the Nasdaq Composite index closed at a record of 5,048.62, up 24% since the beginning of the year, and capping an amazing decade in which it skyrocketed over 1,300%.Then the dotcom bubble burst. Nasdaq lost half its value in 2001 and reached an all-time low of 1,108.49 in October 2002.This time, it’s different. At least according to some. Brian Jacobsen, chief portfolio strategist at Wells Fargo, predicted last month that the Nasdaq would soon reach 6,000. “Valuations are just very reasonable,” he told CNBC. “I think the big thing that is going to drive the market higher is people buying into the idea that the market isn’t going to fall out from underneath them.”Others are less sure. Stephen Massocca, chief investment officer at Wedbush Equity Management, said the rise was being underpinned by monetary policy rather than fundamental value of the companies in the index. “Ultimately what’s driving this is low interest rates and easy money,” he said.Investors have also bid up social media companies to “1999-2000 level”, he said. Massocca said social media stocks were the “Inner Station” – home to the crazed ivory trader Mr Kurtz in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness – at the centre of the story of Nasdaq’s new rise.“I don’t know when it’s going to end but I know how,” said Massocca. He said that when investors start to believe the end is coming for the easy monetary policies in the US, Europe and Japan then there would be a “swift and violent” reaction in the stock markets.Worries about a tech bubble have been growing as a new generation of tech companies have attracted sky high valuations. Uber, the taxi app comp[any, is now valued at $41bn, Snapchat, the ephemeral messaging service, is valued at $15bn.Many industry leaders have raised concerns about a new asset bubble. Last month billionaire Mark Cuban, who made a fortune in the last tech boom, warned against the current appetite for tech.“If we thought it was stupid to invest in public internet websites that had no chance of succeeding back then, it’s worse today,” he wrote in a blogpost.
article
Sell
Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
user
박재훈투영인
·
5 months ago
0
0
Another Tech Bubble? Maybe Not (April 16, 2012)
It's beginning to feel frothy in Silicon Valley. Here are a few numbers:On the first day of its initial public offering LinkedIn was valued at nearly $9 billion; today the social networking site is worth more than $10 billion. Instagram, a company with no profits, no revenue and no plan to make money, was just bought for a cool billion. The buyer was Facebook, a firm in the process of going public.And those values are nothing compared with what Facebook may be worth itself. That company is expected to be valued at between $80 billion and $100 billion after its IPO later this spring.But is this a bubble? Is the considerable exuberance in this part of the world irrational?Here in Silicon Valley you hear some version of this statement all the time: "This is different. I was here in the 1990s and these companies are not Pets.com."Investors and entrepreneurs have been saying this to each other for years, in part because it is true. Facebook generated $1 billion in profit last year. It's still almost doubling its revenue and profit year to year and it's doing all of that with a relatively small workforce.Instagram created a social network of 30 million people with just over a dozen employees. These companies have created ways to connect millions and build enormous audiences incredibly efficiently. That is worth something. The question is, what?Jean-Paul Rodrigue, a professor at Hofstra University, published an influential chart just before the financial bubble burst in 2008. He broke bubbles down into four stages:Steve Blank is a serial entrepreneur in Silicon Valley and an adjunct professor at Columbia Business School. He says we have sailed through the stealth phase of the current technology investment cycle. We are past the point where big investors are aware of the opportunities in mobile and social companies and we're rapidly entering into a period of manic excitement of the next wave of Internet companies.But Blank says not all bubbles are created equal — not all bubbles are bad. "Bubbles built the railroads," he says. "Bubbles built the steel industry." He believes many of the technologies that are attracting so much excitement right now have the potential to change the way we live and how the economy works.That may be. But prices are high enough now that many wonder whether companies like Facebook can justify their own hype. When investors talk about bubbles, typically they end up comparing a company's profits with its share price. The price-to-earnings ratio is a staple of evaluating a stock. ExxonMobil's P/E ratio hovers around 10. That means the company is valued at something like 10 times its annual profit.Apple has a P/E ratio of 17. That's high compared with historical averages, but Apple's earnings have been growing incredibly fast and the company is sitting on $100 billion in cash. And its stock looks positively cheap in comparison with the latest crop of social media companies that are going public.If after Facebook's initial public offering it's valued at more than $100 billion it will have a P/E ratio of 100 to 1. And that's a bargain compared with LinkedIn, which is trading at a ratio of between 800 and 900 to 1. These are bubblicious prices.To justify its projected IPO price to more conventional investors, Facebook will need to double its earnings every year for the next three or four years. Those who sell now may realize windfalls and those who buy have to hope for years of exceptional growth or they will be left holding the bag.But Blank says this may not be bad news for the economy as a whole."Unlike other bubbles — housing bubbles and financial bubbles — nerds don't buy yachts. They seem to reinvest in their own domain," he says.
article
Neutral
Neutral
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
+2
user
박재훈투영인
·
5 months ago
0
0
Why this Time the Tech Bubble is Different(May 4, 2022)
We are in a stock market carnage. Pandemic darling stocks Zoom, Peloton, Carvana, and many other NASDAQ stocks have tumbled from their highs. FAANG + Microsoft stocks have lost close to $1.4 trillion of value due to the market meltdown in April. We are in a “tech bubble” but this time the bubble is different.Going back to 2001The 2000 and 2001 tech bubble was different than what we are seeing now. The early 2000s tech stock bubble happened mainly due to tech stock speculation mania. This was the time when the internet was created. Many visionaries rightfully saw the internet as the most important innovation since the industrial revolution (similar to how Bitcoin is now). Private (venture capital) and public market money poured into these internet companies. Investment banks paid analysts bonuses for pumping up buy ratings of worthless doc com businesses to get more business from these companies. In 2000, at the height of the tech stock boom, NASDAQ IPOs raised $54 billion. This was an all-time high. Between 1995 and 2001, 439 dot-com businesses went public. During the 4th quarter of 1999, an average of $160 million was invested in private tech companies per day. Of course, all good things must come to an end. As you can see below, the speculation mania ended as the NASDAQ reached new highs on March 10th, 2002 (reaching 5048.62 points). The NASDAQ hits its low on October 9th, 2002. This decimated valuations of so many tech companies and bankrupted so many dot com businesses. But of course, from the crash came some of the most valuable companies in the world like Amazon, Alphabet (Google), and Meta (formerly Facebook), which happen to be technology companies.Now Let’s Come Back to 2022If the early 2000s tech bubble was an investor led mania, the 2010s and early 2020s stock market boom is a monetary policy created mania. Zero % interest rates, cheap money, and money printing has been a boon for assets. Just see below growth of financial asset value relative to US GDP (courtesy: St. Louis Fed FRED).Also, shown below is Federal Reserve M2 Money Printing correlated to the US stock market growth (courtesy: Man Yin To | Seeking Alpha Contributor).Easy money and record low interest rates (while the average joe pay high credit card and student loan interest rates) has inflated asset values. Cheap money and low interest rates have made investors searching high return returns. This has led money to flow into commercial real estate, single family homes, tech startups, mortgage backed securities, commercial mortgage backed securities, and the stock market. Also, the rise of passive investing and ETFs (like Vanguard) have made money from individual investors and retirement accounts to flow into blue chip US stocks.Overall, the Fed is stuck in a rock and a hard place. Years of low interest rates and money printing has created the greatest asset bubble in history. Now the world is seeing unpresented inflation. If the Fed raise rates 8–9 times as the Fed has planned, expect a recession and financial markets to collapse. This was probably tolerable in the 70s, early 2000s, and even 2008. But now the US is heavily financialized. So many retirement accounts are going to lose value by almost half. Wall Street does not want the music to stop and the Fed knows this fact. But the Fed also does not want inflation to run amuck. This is also a crucial year for the US given that the country is having its Midterm elections. Majority of Americans disapprove or President Biden’s actions, which signals bad news for the Democratic Party, which holds majority in both the US House of Representatives and Senate. On a recent podcast, Morgan Creek’s capital Mark Yusko mentioned that the we’ll be lucky to have 3 fed rate hikes. I echo Mark’s sentiment. The fed wants to fight inflation while not rocking the boat. In this case, the Fed is going to tread very carefully.Overall, the decade of the 2010s is going to be mainly defied by money printing and the rise of Web 2.0. But we are already seeing the cracks. Tech stocks, including the FAANGs, are in free fall. One of the most respected tech investors, Chase Coleman of Tiger Global, has lost 44% YTD. Cathie Wood’s signature Ark Invest ETF is down nearly 40% YTD. But the worst is yet to come. Food inflation is at an all-time high. We are also seeing many sovereign nations lose faith in the US Dollar and de-dollarization is accelerating. With more rate hikes by the Fed to control inflation expect a harsher reaction from financial markets. I do not have a crystal ball to predict what will happen in the future. But what is known for sure is that global uncertainty and risk will only increase. We are still in for some pain.But with pain comes opportunity. Now is the time to go bargain hunting on some really good investments (as we have mentioned here, here, here, here, and here). After the tech bubble burst, some of the most valuable and important companies like Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, and Google came from the tech space. This is while useless “dot-com” companies with no sales went bust. Also similar to the last tech bubble, we are witnessing the birth of the new technology and asset class: Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin and crypto are going to create the next wave of finance and decentralized applications. As investors are seeking places to allocate their capital, expect more money to go into crypto. Same can be true for commodities, climate change technology, and emerging market equities. Useless companies that went up thanks to money printing are just going to collapse and go bankrupt. Strong emerging tech companies are going to be the next billion- and trillion-dollar companies. As this “everything bubble” bursts, expect some gems to rise up from the ashes.
article
Sell
Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
+3
Economy & Strategy
user
셀스마트 인디
·
2 months ago
3
0
Apple’s May 1 Earnings: What Is an “Event-Driven” Strategy?
What Is an Event-Driven Earnings Strategy?This strategy focuses on price action triggered by earnings announcements. When a company beats consensus estimates (earnings surprise), traders take a long position to capture the upside. If results fall short (earnings shock), a short or sell position is taken to profit from the drop.The charts above show average 5-day return distributions after earnings surprises (left) and earnings shocks (right). Post-surprise returns tend to be skewed positively, while shocks often result in sharp short-term declines.Event-Driven Strategy ProcessIdentify earnings dates and consensus estimates in advance.Anticipate large price moves if actual results deviate significantly from expectations.(Apple’s earnings will be announced May 1, 2025, 4:00 p.m. EDT, or May 2, 5:00 a.m. KST.)Based on the nature of the surprise or shock, establish a position immediately following the announcement.Implement risk controls like stop-losses to manage volatility.Strengths and WeaknessesThis strategy offers a rare opportunity to profit from clearly defined events, independent of broader market trends.This heatmap shows simulated trading results based on earnings surprises. The left chart shows average returns, and the right shows win rates, based on when investors bought before and sold after the earnings release.Notably, buying 6 days before and selling shortly after the earnings event yielded a 78.2% win rate across 55 earnings events.In contrast, during earnings shocks, pre-event short positions performed better, while post-announcement trades suffered notable losses. Win rates were also higher for pre-event sellers.This final heatmap generalizes event-driven strategies across all earnings events. While certain windows are effective, the consistency of outperformance is rare over the long term in upward-trending markets.Final ThoughtsEvent-driven strategies can yield powerful short-term returns, especially during earnings season. However, they require precision and experience. For most retail investors, a better long-term approach may be to hold fundamentally strong names like Apple and navigate short-term noise with patience and discipline.Apple’s May 1 earnings may offer a near-term opportunity — but investors must also weigh broader market risks, including macroeconomic uncertainty and U.S.–China trade tensions, before reacting.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
AAPL
Apple
user
셀스마트 판다
·
3 months ago
0
0
Trump Reverses Course — Smartphones and Semiconductors Exempt from Tariffs (Apr 13, 2025)
The Trump administration has announced a tariff exemption on roughly 20 key tech-related products, including smartphones, laptops, and semiconductors. On April 11, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), under the Department of Homeland Security, officially declared that both the base 10% tariffs and additional surcharges would not apply to these items.The decision appears to be driven by growing domestic pressure over rising consumer costs and the need to protect U.S. tech companies from collateral damage in the trade war.Following the announcement, Apple (AAPL) gained +4.06%, and Nvidia (NVDA) rose +3.12%, reflecting a sharp rebound in investor sentiment. Apple, whose production relies heavily on China, had been seen as vulnerable to tariff risks. Nvidia, which sources chips from TSMC in Taiwan, also benefited as the exemption covers core components in its supply chain.Samsung Electronics and TSMC are expected to benefit indirectly. For Samsung, export channels into the U.S. face reduced strain. TSMC gains by securing shipment stability for major clients like Nvidia now protected from tariff risks. However, tariff policy volatility remains high, and future reversals cannot be ruled out.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
AAPL
Apple
+1
user
셀스마트 KIM
·
3 months ago
5
0
The Survival Record of the S&P 500: Turning Crises into Opportunities
Historically, the S&P 500 has endured numerous crises—yet time and again, it has demonstrated an ability to recover. At SellSmart, we analyzed major market crash episodes and their recovery paths to provide investors with key insights on how to navigate future downturns.<The 2002 Dot-Com Crash>From the peak in March 2000 to the bottom in October 2002, the S&P 500 fell approximately 49%. The collapse was driven by tech stock overvaluation, IPO mania, and accounting scandals involving Enron and WorldCom.In response, the Federal Reserve aggressively cut interest rates from 6.5% to 1.0% and introduced the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to improve corporate accountability. However, structural issues and a prolonged tech slump delayed recovery—it took about 7 years for the index to return to previous highs. During this time, value stocks led a slow but steady market upturn.<The 2008 Global Financial Crisis>From its peak in October 2007 to the trough in March 2009, the S&P 500 plummeted roughly 57%. The subprime mortgage meltdown, Lehman Brothers’ collapse, and a global credit freeze were at the heart of the crisis.The Federal Reserve and the U.S. government launched unprecedented stimulus efforts, including quantitative easing, TARP, and the Dodd-Frank Act. The market took approximately 5.5 years to recover its pre-crisis levels. A new bull run was led by tech giants like Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, and Microsoft (GAFAM), while ETFs saw a massive surge in popularity under a low-interest-rate environment.<The 2020 COVID Shock>From its peak in February 2020 to the bottom in March, the S&P 500 sank by about 34%. The global pandemic, economic lockdowns, and supply chain collapses triggered the selloff.The Federal Reserve launched unlimited QE and slashed interest rates to zero, while the government passed the CARES Act, providing direct fiscal support. Astonishingly, the market rebounded to pre-crisis levels in just five months, driven by tech platform companies and a surge in retail investor participation. The “stay-at-home” trade led the rapid recovery.<The 2025 Tariff Shock>The most recent crisis, the April 2025 “Tariff Shock,” began with the Trump administration’s announcement of tariffs up to 49% on select imports. The S&P 500 has since declined 17.41% from its February 19 peak. In retaliation, China plans to implement 34% tariffs on U.S. goods starting April 10, further intensifying global trade tensions.This tariff shock poses near-term risks to global economic growth and investor sentiment. As tariffs take effect, markets may fall further amid supply chain disruptions and corporate earnings pressures.However, history shows that markets eventually find a new equilibrium and recover.Conclusion:1. The Importance of Policy ResponseAs seen in past episodes (dot-com crash, financial crisis, COVID shock), swift and powerful actions from central banks and governments play a pivotal role in market recoveries. The same will likely apply in the current tariff-driven environment—rate cuts and fiscal stimulus will be critical.2. Long-Term Investment StrategyHistorically, market crashes have offered compelling buying opportunities for long-term investors. Legendary investors like Warren Buffett have generated exceptional returns by buying undervalued assets when fear peaks.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
SPX
S&P500
user
박재훈투영인
·
3 months ago
0
0
Should We Sell Tech Stocks Exposed to Tariffs? (Apr 4, 2025)
Since President Trump's tariff announcement on April 2, tech stocks have struggled to find their footing. But some companies are clearly in deeper trouble than others.In particular, hardware-focused tech firms with globally distributed supply chains are scrambling to assess the impact. While some tariffs may eventually be reduced through negotiation, the worst-case scenario would see elevated import duties remain in place — potentially triggering retaliatory tariffs from other countries.Current tariff rates include:China: 54% (including pre-existing 20%)Vietnam: 46%India: 26%Taiwan: 32%Malaysia: 24%These countries are key manufacturing hubs for smartphone components, according to Morningstar equity analyst Phelix Lee.Gil Luria, Head of Tech Research at D.A. Davidson, said:“This is the most significant shift in economic outlook since the onset of COVID-19.”As investors assess how tariffs could impact valuations, risk tolerance is becoming a decisive factor. Those unable to stomach volatility or navigate prolonged uncertainty may shy away from hardware-heavy tech names.For those choosing to stay in the game, it’s worth closely watching companies exposed to imported hardware.According to J.P. Morgan's April 3 report, PCs are expected to face the largest price hikes, followed by servers and networking equipment.While the administration says chips will be excluded from the latest tariffs, many semiconductors are embedded in finished goods like PCs and servers — meaning indirect exposure is still significant.J.P. Morgan analysts noted that many tech companies had already begun adjusting supply chains and fine-tuning pricing models in anticipation of tariffs. However, the unexpectedly steep increases may force firms to accelerate reshoring efforts, which come at a high cost. Executives must now weigh whether these tariffs are a negotiation tactic or a long-term policy.Luria observed:“There was a lot of knee-jerk selling — you could see that in real time. But there’s also paralysis. If I like a company like Apple for the long term — if I believe people will continue buying iPhones and using more services — then I still want to own it. I don’t believe this is permanent.”Pinpointing the exact impact is difficult, as it depends on a company’s sourcing geography — and that information isn’t always disclosed to the market.J.P. Morgan estimates that, for hardware-centric firms, the blended effective tariff rate is around 30%, which could cut gross margins by 10% unless prices are raised.Company-Specific Estimates:Apple Inc.~80% of revenue from hardwareWould need to raise prices 6% globally to offset the impactDell Technologies Inc.75% hardware revenueWould require a 11% global price hike to maintain marginsCisco Systems Inc.34% hardware exposureEstimated 6% price increase neededSuper Micro Computer Inc.100% hardware revenueNeeds just 4% global price hike due to supply chain structureHewlett Packard Enterprise Co.62% hardware revenueEstimated 6% price increaseQualcomm Inc.Only 3% of hardware revenue affectedNo price increase requiredBig tech firms building out massive data centers — like Microsoft, Meta, Google, and Amazon — may also scale back capex as hardware costs surge.Luria noted:“These companies were building AI infrastructure far ahead of demand, made possible by strong core businesses and healthy cash flow. In a weaker economy, with declining demand for goods and services, they’ll likely pull back on those investments.”[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Sell
Sell
AAPL
Apple
+9
user
셀스마트 대니
·
3 months ago
0
0
S&P 493: A More Stable Investment Than the Magnificent 7 Amid Trade Risks? (Mar 24, 2025)
Trade Policy Uncertainty and Its Impact on U.S. EquitiesAs trade policy risks continue to escalate, concerns are rising that the Magnificent 7 (Mag. 7) tech giants could be more vulnerable to global economic slowdown and trade barriers. Meanwhile, the remaining S&P 493 stocks—those outside the Mag. 7—may offer relative stability, given their lower dependence on foreign revenue.Lower Foreign Revenue Exposure in S&P 493According to Goldman Sachs, Mag. 7 companies generate 49% of their revenue from international markets, while Nasdaq 100 (NDX) firms have a similarly high exposure of 46%.In contrast,S&P 493 derives only 26% of its revenue from foreign markets, whileS&P 500 (SPX) overall sits at 28%.Russell 2000 (RUT) and S&P MidCap 400 (MID) have even lower foreign revenue exposure at 21% and 25%, respectively—highlighting their more domestic-focused nature.Mag. 7’s Exposure to Global Trade RisksTech giants such as Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Tesla, and NVIDIA have significant exposure to international markets, particularly in Asia and Europe. This makes them highly susceptible to any U.S. trade protectionism or geopolitical tensions.On the other hand, S&P 493 companies are more insulated from trade volatility, as they derive a larger share of their revenue from the domestic U.S. economy.Investment ImplicationsWith trade policy shifts potentially driving short-term market volatility, investors should carefully assess the risks associated with high foreign revenue dependence and consider strategic portfolio adjustments toward domestic-focused companies.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
AAPL
Apple
+8
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Nasdaq 100 Index Overview (Feb 18, 2025)
History & EvolutionThe Nasdaq 100 Index, introduced in 1985, tracks the performance of the top 100 non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange. As the first electronic stock market in 1971, Nasdaq became a hub for technological innovation, and the Nasdaq 100 has since served as a benchmark for large-cap growth companies.Technology Sector DominanceAs of 2025, the technology sector makes up 62.25% of the Nasdaq 100, led by Apple, Microsoft, and NVIDIA. Companies like Amazon and Tesla, though categorized in different sectors, operate technology-driven businesses, further solidifying Nasdaq’s tech-heavy nature. The ongoing AI and digital transformation boom continues to drive the index, making sector concentration risk and rebalancing impact key factors for investors.Nasdaq’s Competitive Edge in IPOsNasdaq has outperformed NYSE in IPO listings for six consecutive years through 2024. Over 160 companies raised $22 billion on Nasdaq in 11 months of 2024, reflecting growing preference among tech-driven firms. AI-related firms' rapid expansion has further fueled Nasdaq’s dominance in public listings.Inclusion & Exclusion CriteriaCompanies must be exclusively listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, maintain high liquidity, and have a minimum 3-month trading history.Financial firms & REITs are excluded.Annual index rebalancing adjusts the composition, removing underperforming stocks.In 2024, Super Micro Computer, Illumina, and Moderna were removed from the index.Nasdaq 100 vs. S&P 500QQQ ETF tracks Nasdaq 100, with a 62.25% tech weighting, making it more volatile.S&P 500 covers 500 companies, offering a more diversified portfolio with lower volatility.Market Performance & Growth TrendsNasdaq 100 experienced major events such as the dot-com bubble (2000), the financial crisis (2008), and AI-driven expansion (2024).After an 800% rise from 1995-2000, the dot-com crash led to a 76.81% decline.The index only recovered its 2000 peak in 2015, but today’s AI-driven rally differs due to companies' strong profitability & financial stability.Innovation & Economic ImpactNasdaq defines innovation as a driver of economic value, knowledge integration, and real-world impact. R&D spending and patent filings serve as key indicators, expanding beyond technology to include healthcare, consumer goods, and other industries.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
NONE
No Relevant Stock
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
When Is the Best Time to Sell Stocks? (Feb 02, 2025)
Proven Principles for Stock Sell TimingKey Selling Principles:Defensive Selling Rules: Limiting Losses7–8% Stop-Loss Rule: Sell immediately if a stock falls 7–8% from the purchase price.This rule is based on over 130 years of stock market history, which shows that even the best stocks rarely drop more than 8% from their entry point.Capital preservation is paramount—"Sell first, ask questions later."If a stock falls more than 8%, it signals that there may be issues with the purchase timing, the company, the industry, or the overall market.Aggressive Selling Rules: Realizing Gains20–25% Profit-Taking Rule: Sell all or part of your position if the stock rises by 20–25% from an optimal buy point.It is best to sell in a rising, bullish market.Growth stocks typically surge 20–25% following a breakout from a favorable chart pattern before undergoing a pullback.The "72 Rule" applies: achieving 24% gains compounded three times doubles your capital.Exception: The 8-Week Holding RuleIf a stock surges more than 20% within three weeks of a breakout, hold it for at least eight weeks.Stocks with the strength to quickly rise over 20% may have the potential to become market leaders, so this rule should be applied only to true market leaders.While significant adjustments may occur during these eight weeks, you must weather the volatility.After eight weeks, you may then choose to either realize gains or continue holding.Considerations When Deciding to Sell:Assess overall market trends.In weaker markets, consider triggering stop-losses even at 3–5% declines.Calculate profit-taking based on your ideal buy point.Always prioritize capital preservation.Examples from Leading Companies:Even top growth stocks like Apple (AAPL), Nvidia (NVDA), Alphabet (GOOGL), Netflix (NFLX), and Amazon (AMZN) have experienced steep declines. Timing your exit well is critical to protecting gains.These principles are proven methods for limiting losses and locking in profits in stock investing, thereby safeguarding your portfolio and enabling long-term success.
article
Neutral
Neutral
NONE
No Relevant Stock
user
셀스마트 페니
·
4 months ago
0
0
SellSmart® Best of Breed: The Key to a High-Growth Portfolio
Hello, this is CORE16. Our SellSmart® Best of Breed (BoB) portfolio has been delivering outstanding performance, significantly outpacing both the S&P 500 index and our internally managed CORE16 Stock 21 Series Buy & Hold strategy.The SellSmart Best of Breed (BoB) portfolio is designed to adapt swiftly to market trends, selecting the most attractive stocks based on a comprehensive analysis of price momentum, trading volume shifts, and financial stability. Using 2020 as the baseline (100), BoB has surged to a level of 655, demonstrating remarkable growth.The CORE16 Stock 21 Series Buy & Hold strategy, which focuses on market capitalization, industry leadership, and innovation, has steadily climbed to 310, maintaining a solid upward trend. However, its more conservative approach results in a smoother and less aggressive growth curve compared to BoB.Meanwhile, the S&P 500 index, the global stock market benchmark, currently stands at approximately 172. Although it has maintained a steady upward trajectory, reflecting the gradual recovery of the U.S. economy, its gains remain significantly lower compared to the SellSmart BoB strategy.The outperformance of the Best of Breed strategy can be attributed to its rigorous stock selection process, continuous portfolio adjustments based on market conditions, and proactive risk management. However, as with any strategy, past performance does not guarantee future success. Investors should align their investment decisions with their risk tolerance and the prevailing market environment.
article
Neutral
Neutral
AAPL
Apple
user
셀스마트 앤지
·
4 months ago
1
0
What is Warren Buffett's "Sell Smart"?
Warren Buffett, one of the most respected and legendary investors in the world, is widely known as a “value investor.” However, he is actually a “growth investor.” This is because Buffett does not sell simply based on a high Price-to-Earnings Ratio (PER).Traditionally, value investors make buy and sell decisions based on valuation metrics such as PER and Price-to-Book Ratio (PBR), aiming to buy at low prices and sell at high prices. In contrast, growth investors focus less on multiples and more on Earnings Per Share (EPS) trends, specifically whether a company can sustain its profit growth over time.Buffett’s Core Investment StrategyInvesting in companies with strong brands and sustainable competitive advantages – Coca-Cola, American Express, and Apple all have high customer loyalty and global market dominance.Long-term holding strategy – Most of Buffett’s top-performing stocks have been held for decades, maximizing the power of compounding returns.Preference for companies with strong pricing power – Buffett favors companies like Moody’s and Apple, where raising prices does not significantly impact customer demand.Adapting to change while maintaining principles – He sold stakes in some banks (Wells Fargo, U.S. Bancorp) but continued to hold Bank of America due to confidence in its CEO.His core investment strategy reflects that he makes investment decisions based on long-term revenue growth and the key attributes necessary for EPS growth.Key Takeaway from Buffett’s Sell Smart ApproachMaking sell decisions solely based on stock price fluctuations or valuation multiples may not be sufficient for successful investing. The lesson from Buffett’s Sell Smart strategy is that a deep understanding of a company’s core competitive advantages and the ability to recognize fundamental changes are essential for a successful investment journey.Apple’s Stock Price Trend & Buffett’s Major Sell Decisions1) Large-scale selling during EPS growth stagnation (First bought in 2016, major selling in early 2024)2) No position reduction despite high PER (No selling in 2020 and 2021, despite high valuation)Source: QuantiWise, Forbes, Core16
article
Neutral
Neutral
AAPL
Apple
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
5 signs the world is headed for a recession(Oct 2, 2022)
Around the world, markets are flashing warning signs that the global economy is teetering on a cliff’s edge.The question of a recession is no longer if, but when.Over the past week, the pulse of those flashing red lights quickened as markets grappled with the reality — once speculative, now certain — that the Federal Reserve will press on with its most aggressive monetary tightening campaign in decades to wring inflation from the US economy. Even if that means triggering a recession. And even if it comes at the expense of consumers and businesses far beyond US borders.There’s now a 98% chance of a global recession, according to research firm Ned Davis, which brings some sobering historical credibility to the table. The firm’s recession probability reading has only been this high twice before — in 2008 and 2020.When economists warn of a downturn, they’re typically basing their assessment on a variety of indicators.Let’s unpack five key trends:The mighty US dollarThe US dollar plays an outsized role in the global economy and international finance. And right now, it is stronger than it’s been in two decades.The simplest explanation comes back to the Fed.When the US central bank raises interest rates, as it has been doing since March, it makes the dollar more appealing to investors around the world.In any economic climate, the dollar is seen as a safe place to park your money. In a tumultuous climate — a global pandemic, say, or a war in Eastern Europe — investors have even more incentive to purchase dollars, usually in the form of US government bonds.While a strong dollar is a nice perk for Americans traveling abroad, it creates headaches for just about everyone else.The value of the UK pound, the euro, China’s yuan and Japan’s yen, among many others, has tumbled. That makes it more expensive for those nations to import essential items like food and fuel.In response, central banks that are already fighting pandemic-induced inflation wind up raising rates higher and faster to shore up the value of their own currencies.The dollar’s strength also creates destabilizing effects for Wall Street, as many of the S&P 500 companies do business around the world. By one estimate from Morgan Stanley, each 1% rise in the dollar index has a negative 0.5% impact on S&P 500 earnings.America’s economic engine stallsThe No. 1 driver of the world’s largest economy is shopping. And America’s shoppers are tired.After more than a year of rising prices on just about everything, with wages not keeping up, consumers have pulled back.“The hardship caused by inflation means that consumers are dipping into their savings,” EY Parthenon Chief Economist Gregory Daco said in a note Friday. The personal saving rate in August remained unchanged at only 3.5%, Daco said — near its lowest rate since 2008, and well below its pre-Covid level of around 9%.Once again, the reason behind the pullback has a lot to do with the Fed.Interest rates have risen at a historic pace, pushing mortgage rates to their highest level in more than a decade and making it harder for businesses to grow. Eventually, the Fed’s rate hikes should broadly bring costs down. But in the meantime, consumers are getting a one-two punch of high borrowing rates and high prices, especially when it comes to necessities like food and housing.Americans opened their wallets during the 2020 lockdowns, which powered the economy out of its brief-but-severe pandemic recession. Since then, government aid has evaporated and inflation has taken root, pushing prices up at their fastest rate in 40 years and sapping consumers’ spending power.Corporate America tightens its beltBusiness has been booming across industries for the bulk of the pandemic era, even with historically high inflation eating into profits. That is thanks (once again) to the tenacity of American shoppers, as businesses were largely able to pass on their higher costs to consumers to cushion profit margins.But the earnings bonanza may not last.In mid-September, one company whose fortunes serve as a kind of economic bellwether gave investors a shock.FedEx, which operates in more than 200 countries, unexpectedly revised its outlook, warning that demand was softening, and earnings were likely to plunge more than 40%.In an interview, its CEO was asked whether he believes the slowdown was a sign of a looming global recession.“I think so,” he responded. “These numbers, they don’t portend very well.”FedEx isn’t alone. On Tuesday, Apple’s stock fell after Bloomberg reported the company was scrapping plans to increase iPhone 14 production after demand came in below expectations.And just ahead of the holiday season, when employers would normally ramp up hiring, the mood is now more cautious.“We’ve not seen the normal September uptick in companies posting for temporary help,” said Julia Pollak, chief economist at ZipRecruiter. “Companies are hanging back and waiting to see what conditions hold.”Welcome to bear territoryWall Street has been hit with whiplash, and stocks are now on track for their worst year since 2008 — in case anyone needs yet another scary historical comparison.But last year was a very different story. Equity markets thrived in 2021, with the S&P 500 soaring 27%, thanks to a torrent of cash pumped in by the Federal Reserve, which unleashed a double-barreled monetary-easing policy in the spring of 2020 to keep financial markets from crumbling.The party lasted until early 2022. But as inflation set in, the Fed began to take away the proverbial punch bowl, raising interest rates and unwinding its bond-buying mechanism that had propped up the market.The hangover has been brutal. The S&P 500, the broadest measure of Wall Street — and the index responsible for the bulk of Americans’ 401(k)s — is down nearly 24% for the year. And it’s not alone. All three major US indexes are in bear markets — down at least 20% from their most recent highs.In an unfortunate twist, bond markets, typically a safe haven for investors when stocks and other assets decline, are also in a tailspin.FedEx isn’t alone. On Tuesday, Apple’s stock fell after Bloomberg reported the company was scrapping plans to increase iPhone 14 production after demand came in below expectations.And just ahead of the holiday season, when employers would normally ramp up hiring, the mood is now more cautious.“We’ve not seen the normal September uptick in companies posting for temporary help,” said Julia Pollak, chief economist at ZipRecruiter. “Companies are hanging back and waiting to see what conditions hold.”Welcome to bear territoryWall Street has been hit with whiplash, and stocks are now on track for their worst year since 2008 — in case anyone needs yet another scary historical comparison.But last year was a very different story. Equity markets thrived in 2021, with the S&P 500 soaring 27%, thanks to a torrent of cash pumped in by the Federal Reserve, which unleashed a double-barreled monetary-easing policy in the spring of 2020 to keep financial markets from crumbling.The party lasted until early 2022. But as inflation set in, the Fed began to take away the proverbial punch bowl, raising interest rates and unwinding its bond-buying mechanism that had propped up the market.The hangover has been brutal. The S&P 500, the broadest measure of Wall Street — and the index responsible for the bulk of Americans’ 401(k)s — is down nearly 24% for the year. And it’s not alone. All three major US indexes are in bear markets — down at least 20% from their most recent highs.In an unfortunate twist, bond markets, typically a safe haven for investors when stocks and other assets decline, are also in a tailspin.Once again, blame the Fed.Inflation, along with the steep rise in interest rates by the central bank, has pushed bond prices down, which causes bond yields (aka the return an investor gets for their loan to the government) to go up.On Wednesday, the yield on the 10-year US Treasury briefly surpassed 4%, hitting its highest level in 14 years. That surge was followed by a steep drop in response to the Bank of England’s intervention in its own spiraling bond market — amounting to tectonic moves in a corner of the financial world that is designed to be steady, if not downright boring.European bond yields are also spiking as central banks follow the Fed’s lead in raising rates to shore up their own currencies.Bottom line: There are few safe places for investors to put their money right now, and that’s unlikely to change until global inflation gets under control and central banks loosen their grips.War, soaring prices and radical policies collideNowhere is the collision of economic, financial, and political calamities more painfully visible than in the United Kingdom.Like the rest of the world, the UK has struggled with surging prices that are largely attributable to the colossal shock of Covid-19, followed by the trade disruptions created by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. As the West cut off imports of Russian natural gas, energy prices have soared and supplies have dwindled.Those events were bad enough on their own.But then, just over a week ago, the freshly installed government of Prime Minister Liz Truss announced a sweeping tax-cut plan that economists from both ends of the political spectrum have decried as unorthodox at best, diabolical at worst.In short, the Truss administration said it would slash taxes for all Britons to encourage spending and investment and, in theory, soften the blow of a recession. But the tax cuts aren’t funded, which means the government must take on debt to finance them.That decision set off a panic in financial markets and put Downing Street in a standoff with its independent central bank, the Bank of England. Investors around the world sold off UK bonds in droves, plunging the pound to its lowest level against the dollar in nearly 230 years. As in, since 1792, when Congress made the US dollar legal tender.The BOE staged an emergency intervention to buy up UK bonds on Wednesday and restore order in financial markets. It stemmed the bleeding, for now. But the ripple effects of the Trussonomics turmoil is spreading far beyond the offices of bond traders.Britons, who are already in a cost-of-living crisis, with inflation at 10% — the highest of any G7 economy — are now panicking over higher borrowing costs that could force millions of homeowners’ monthly mortgage payments to go up by hundreds or even thousands of pounds.The upshotWhile the consensus is that a global recession is likely sometime in 2023, it’s impossible to predict how severe it will be or how long it will last. Not every recession is as painful as the 2007-09 Great Recession, but every recession is, of course, painful.Some economies, particularly the United States, with its strong labor market and resilient consumers, will be able to withstand the blow better than others.“We are in uncharted waters in the months ahead,” wrote economists at the World Economic Forum in a report this week.“The immediate outlook for the global economy and for much of the world’s population is dark,” they continued, adding that the challenges “will test the resilience of economies and societies and exact a punishing human toll.”But there are some silver linings, they said. Crises force transformations that can ultimately improve standards of living and make economies stronger.“Businesses have to change. This has been the story since the pandemic started,” said Rima Bhatia, an economic adviser for Gulf International Bank. “Businesses no longer can continue on the path that they were at. That’s the opportunity and that’s the silver lining.”
article
Sell
Sell
226490
Samsung KODEX KOSPI ETF
Stock Picks
user
셀스마트 대니
·
3 months ago
1
0
🟢 A Signal from Apple: The One Everyone’s Been Waiting For
"Is now the time to buy?"If you've been asking yourself that question multiple times a day lately—you’re not alone.With the market in turmoil, SellSmart has just picked up a quiet but powerful BUY signal.📈 And the name? Apple (AAPL).The signal comes from SellSmart’s proprietary indicator: the BSL model.📊 What is the BSL Indicator?"Indicators should be simple. But precise."BSL (BUY_SELL_LOSS) is a statistically-driven model that analyzes return distributions over time to detect extreme price movements.In simple terms:When a stock has gone too far up → SELL signalWhen a stock has dropped too much → BUY signal🍎 Apple Just Flashed a Rare BUY SignalApple shares have slumped following President Trump’s announcement of sweeping tariffs.As fear spread, many investors were quick to sell.But the BSL model tells a different story:📉 "The drop is overdone.The excess is gone. Historically, this is when opportunity knocks."💡 BSL vs. Price – A Proven Pattern"We’ve seen this before.Past BUY signals from BSL have often aligned with strong rebounds.""It’s not about timing the bottom—It’s about spotting when pessimism is stretched too far."BUY signal & SELL signal💬 Final Thoughts“Markets may swing.But your strategy shouldn’t.”Now more than ever, it’s time to listen quietly—to the data.Let today’s SellSmart move become tomorrow’s smart return.We’re here to help you stay one step ahead.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
AAPL
Apple