logo

HomeArticlesServicePriceAbout

logo
article
셀스마트 대니 프로필 사진셀스마트 대니
S&P 493: A More Stable Investment Than the Magnificent 7 Amid Trade Risks? (Mar 24, 2025)
created At: 3/24/2025
Neutral
Neutral
This analysis was written from a neutral perspective. We advise you to always make careful and well-informed investment decisions.
45
0
0
Fact
Mag. 7 firms derive 49% of their revenue from foreign markets, while Nasdaq 100 (NDX) has 46%. S&P 493 has a lower foreign revenue share of 26%, and S&P 500 (SPX) overall is at 28%. Russell 2000 (RUT) and S&P MidCap 400 (MID) have the lowest foreign revenue exposure at 21% and 25%, respectively. Mag. 7 firms are highly dependent on global markets, making them more exposed to trade policy risks.
Opinion
If trade barriers increase, tech-heavy firms with high international revenue exposure may face greater risks, while domestic-focused S&P 493 stocks could serve as a more defensive investment choice. In a protectionist environment, companies with strong U.S. revenue bases may outperform their global counterparts.
Core Sell Point
With U.S. trade policy shifts posing risks to globally reliant firms, Mag. 7 stocks could face headwinds, whereas S&P 493 companies may serve as a more stable alternative in an environment of growing trade uncertainty.

Trade Policy Uncertainty and Its Impact on U.S. Equities

As trade policy risks continue to escalate, concerns are rising that the Magnificent 7 (Mag. 7) tech giants could be more vulnerable to global economic slowdown and trade barriers. Meanwhile, the remaining S&P 493 stocks—those outside the Mag. 7—may offer relative stability, given their lower dependence on foreign revenue.

Lower Foreign Revenue Exposure in S&P 493

According to Goldman Sachs, Mag. 7 companies generate 49% of their revenue from international markets, while Nasdaq 100 (NDX) firms have a similarly high exposure of 46%.

In contrast,

  • S&P 493 derives only 26% of its revenue from foreign markets, while

  • S&P 500 (SPX) overall sits at 28%.

  • Russell 2000 (RUT) and S&P MidCap 400 (MID) have even lower foreign revenue exposure at 21% and 25%, respectively—highlighting their more domestic-focused nature.

Mag. 7’s Exposure to Global Trade Risks

Tech giants such as Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Tesla, and NVIDIA have significant exposure to international markets, particularly in Asia and Europe. This makes them highly susceptible to any U.S. trade protectionism or geopolitical tensions.

On the other hand, S&P 493 companies are more insulated from trade volatility, as they derive a larger share of their revenue from the domestic U.S. economy.

Investment Implications

With trade policy shifts potentially driving short-term market volatility, investors should carefully assess the risks associated with high foreign revenue dependence and consider strategic portfolio adjustments toward domestic-focused companies.

[Compliance Note]

  • All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.

  • The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.

  • Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.

45
0
0
Comments
0
Please leave a comment first