Alphabet Class A
Search Result
Firm
user
셀스마트 앤지
·
2 months ago
0
0
The Cloud Wars: OpenAI May Be the Key Battlefield
Q1 2025 Cloud Earnings SnapshotAI fuels Azure’s momentumMicrosoft, AWS, and Google Cloud have all reported robust cloud earnings for Q1 2025. While AWS remains the market leader, Microsoft and Google Cloud posted stronger growth rates, suggesting shifting dynamics in the cloud infrastructure war.1. Global Cloud Market Overview – Q1 2025Total enterprise cloud infrastructure spending hit $94 billion, up 23% YoYSynergy Research’s John Dinsdale: “We’re seeing a clear acceleration in growth across the top cloud providers”Combined market share of the top 3 (AWS, Microsoft, Google): 63%2. Individual Provider Performance – Q1 2025*Note: Microsoft does not report Azure revenue separately; figures are from its Intelligent Cloud segment.AWS: Market leader but losing share (31% in Q1 2024). CEO Andy Jassy emphasized custom silicon (Trainium2) and Bedrock’s flexibility to reduce AI deployment costs.Microsoft: Azure revenue growth 33%, outperforming peers. CEO Satya Nadella highlighted innovation across the stack—from AI infrastructure to applications.Google Cloud: Grew fastest among the top three (28%), buoyed by Gemini 2.5 model rollout. CEO Sundar Pichai stressed Alphabet’s “full-stack AI approach.”3. Why Azure is Outpacing Its RivalsAzure’s 33% growth outpaced AWS and GCP, according to UBSOpenAI may be a key contributor to Azure’s surge, based on a long-term Azure usage deal worth up to $25 billionMicrosoft reportedly powers OpenAI services like Cosmos DB, and UBS suggests OpenAI could now be a major native Azure consumerUncertain macro outlook: UBS warns that AWS and GCP’s slower growth could reflect early signs of a cloud spending slowdown, triggering downward revisions in growth forecasts4. Other Cloud PlayersAlibaba: 4%Oracle: 3%Salesforce, IBM, Tencent, Huawei: 2% eachConclusionThe Q1 2025 cloud market shows continued momentum overall. AWS still leads, but Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud are closing the gap with faster growth. Among them, Microsoft Azure has emerged as the fastest-growing platform, likely driven by its deepening relationship with OpenAI, a major AI infrastructure consumer.Still, looming macroeconomic concerns—such as enterprise IT budget constraints—could temper future growth across the sector. For now, Azure's AI-driven momentum makes it a standout in the cloud arena.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
MSFT
Microsoft
+2
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Goldman Sachs Report: Magnificent 7 Decline and 2025 S&P 500 Target Cut (Mar 11, 2025)
Goldman Sachs has revised its 2025 S&P 500 target downward, citing weakness in the Magnificent 7 (Mag 7), economic uncertainty, and policy risks.1. Magnificent 7: From Dominance to Decline?Past Performance (2023):Mag 7 contributed to over half of the S&P 500’s 25% annual return, driving market gains.Current Crisis (March 2025):Mag 7 plunged 14% in three weeks, triggering a broader S&P 500 decline.Some analysts have started calling them the "Maleficent 7."Key Factors Behind the Decline:Policy Uncertainty: Potential tariff hikes are dampening investor confidence.Economic Slowdown Concerns: Growth forecasts are weakening, adding to investor anxiety.Hedge Fund Unwinding: Heavy long positions in Mag 7 are being liquidated, accelerating the sell-off.Market Implications:A market heavily reliant on a few large-cap tech stocks is vulnerable to volatility.Investors may need to diversify away from Mag 7 to reduce risk exposure.2. S&P 500 2025 Target CutGoldman Sachs now targets 6,200 for year-end 2025, down from 6,500 (-4%).Reasons for the Revision:Lower P/E Ratio Assumption:Cut from 21.5x to 20.6x amid heightened risk.Reduced EPS Growth Forecast:2025 EPS growth outlook cut from 9% to 7% (2026 remains at 7%).Macroeconomic Backdrop:U.S. GDP Growth Slowing: Goldman’s economic team revised growth projections downward.Tariff Increases Expected: Rising tariffs could erode corporate earnings.Higher Uncertainty: Political and economic risks are raising the equity risk premium.Supporting Data:Despite the cut, the new target still suggests an 11% upside from current levels.Goldman now forecasts 2025 EPS at $262 and 2026 EPS at $280, below consensus estimates.3. Additional ConsiderationsImpact of Tariffs:A 5% tariff increase could reduce S&P 500 EPS by 1-2%, assuming firms pass most costs to consumers.Market Risk Indicators:The Economic Policy Uncertainty Index has surged.The spread between S&P 500 earnings yield and real 10-year Treasury yield has widened.ConclusionThe decline of Mag 7 and the S&P 500 target cut reflect Goldman Sachs' cautious stance on U.S. equities.Rising policy risks, slowing growth, and increased volatility signal a more uncertain market environment.Investors should focus on risk management and portfolio diversification in response to these shifts.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
AAPL
Apple
+6
Event
user
셀스마트 KIM
·
2 months ago
3
0
Earnings Don't Lie — And Google Proves It
Earnings Season Is Here—And For Google, Numbers Really Do Move the MarketWhen earnings season rolls around, markets hold their breath.At the center of attention once again is Google (Alphabet), which is scheduled to report Q1 2025 earnings on April 25 (KST). As the largest market cap stock in the S&P 500 Communication Services sector, Google’s earnings are more than just numbers—they are a test of trust.Few companies combine consistent earnings growth with high investor confidence like Google. In such cases, earnings announcements carry significant weight. If expectations are met or exceeded, the stock tends to react swiftly and with momentum. Conversely, a disappointing report can trigger risk aversion and lead to both short-term drops and long-term weakness.Past Earnings Surprise/Disappointment Categories:Google’s earnings history can be classified into five categories compared to consensus estimates:Summary of Google’s Earnings Surprise/Shock Return Distribution: When Google has beaten consensus estimates by more than 30%, the average returns 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months post-earnings have shown a clear upward trend. These periods highlight strengthened investor confidence and sustained upward momentum. In particular, there have been notable instances where market returns 1 month and 3 months post-earnings were both 100% positive.In cases of moderate positive surprises (0–30%), the average return across all timeframes was still positive. Though the gains were smaller, they showed that even modest outperformance can support bullish sentiment. However, volatility tended to increase over time, especially in the 0–10% range where post-earnings momentum was more limited.In contrast, when Google’s earnings missed expectations, short-term returns were mostly negative, and the longer-term trend was also weak. Especially when results fell short by more than 10%, the subsequent stock drop was more pronounced. Earnings disappointments can sharply erode investor confidence and extend market weakness.ConclusionUltimately, earnings drive markets.While macroeconomic indicators and policy moves matter, it is concrete metrics like earnings that shape real investor behavior. For companies with solid earnings history like Google, a single earnings call can either reinforce or undermine investor trust.A strong earnings surprise often triggers not just a short-term rally but sustained gains over 1 to 3 months. Conversely, an earnings miss exceeding 10% can lead to both a steep decline and broader market pessimism.In short, when a company performs well, ride the wave. If not, it’s best to step aside. The simplicity of this principle is powerfully backed by performance data. Earnings season is the perfect time to revisit it.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
GOOGL
Alphabet Class A
Economy & Strategy
user
박재훈투영인
·
3 months ago
0
0
Should We Sell Tech Stocks Exposed to Tariffs? (Apr 4, 2025)
Since President Trump's tariff announcement on April 2, tech stocks have struggled to find their footing. But some companies are clearly in deeper trouble than others.In particular, hardware-focused tech firms with globally distributed supply chains are scrambling to assess the impact. While some tariffs may eventually be reduced through negotiation, the worst-case scenario would see elevated import duties remain in place — potentially triggering retaliatory tariffs from other countries.Current tariff rates include:China: 54% (including pre-existing 20%)Vietnam: 46%India: 26%Taiwan: 32%Malaysia: 24%These countries are key manufacturing hubs for smartphone components, according to Morningstar equity analyst Phelix Lee.Gil Luria, Head of Tech Research at D.A. Davidson, said:“This is the most significant shift in economic outlook since the onset of COVID-19.”As investors assess how tariffs could impact valuations, risk tolerance is becoming a decisive factor. Those unable to stomach volatility or navigate prolonged uncertainty may shy away from hardware-heavy tech names.For those choosing to stay in the game, it’s worth closely watching companies exposed to imported hardware.According to J.P. Morgan's April 3 report, PCs are expected to face the largest price hikes, followed by servers and networking equipment.While the administration says chips will be excluded from the latest tariffs, many semiconductors are embedded in finished goods like PCs and servers — meaning indirect exposure is still significant.J.P. Morgan analysts noted that many tech companies had already begun adjusting supply chains and fine-tuning pricing models in anticipation of tariffs. However, the unexpectedly steep increases may force firms to accelerate reshoring efforts, which come at a high cost. Executives must now weigh whether these tariffs are a negotiation tactic or a long-term policy.Luria observed:“There was a lot of knee-jerk selling — you could see that in real time. But there’s also paralysis. If I like a company like Apple for the long term — if I believe people will continue buying iPhones and using more services — then I still want to own it. I don’t believe this is permanent.”Pinpointing the exact impact is difficult, as it depends on a company’s sourcing geography — and that information isn’t always disclosed to the market.J.P. Morgan estimates that, for hardware-centric firms, the blended effective tariff rate is around 30%, which could cut gross margins by 10% unless prices are raised.Company-Specific Estimates:Apple Inc.~80% of revenue from hardwareWould need to raise prices 6% globally to offset the impactDell Technologies Inc.75% hardware revenueWould require a 11% global price hike to maintain marginsCisco Systems Inc.34% hardware exposureEstimated 6% price increase neededSuper Micro Computer Inc.100% hardware revenueNeeds just 4% global price hike due to supply chain structureHewlett Packard Enterprise Co.62% hardware revenueEstimated 6% price increaseQualcomm Inc.Only 3% of hardware revenue affectedNo price increase requiredBig tech firms building out massive data centers — like Microsoft, Meta, Google, and Amazon — may also scale back capex as hardware costs surge.Luria noted:“These companies were building AI infrastructure far ahead of demand, made possible by strong core businesses and healthy cash flow. In a weaker economy, with declining demand for goods and services, they’ll likely pull back on those investments.”[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Sell
Sell
AAPL
Apple
+9
user
셀스마트 대니
·
3 months ago
0
0
S&P 493: A More Stable Investment Than the Magnificent 7 Amid Trade Risks? (Mar 24, 2025)
Trade Policy Uncertainty and Its Impact on U.S. EquitiesAs trade policy risks continue to escalate, concerns are rising that the Magnificent 7 (Mag. 7) tech giants could be more vulnerable to global economic slowdown and trade barriers. Meanwhile, the remaining S&P 493 stocks—those outside the Mag. 7—may offer relative stability, given their lower dependence on foreign revenue.Lower Foreign Revenue Exposure in S&P 493According to Goldman Sachs, Mag. 7 companies generate 49% of their revenue from international markets, while Nasdaq 100 (NDX) firms have a similarly high exposure of 46%.In contrast,S&P 493 derives only 26% of its revenue from foreign markets, whileS&P 500 (SPX) overall sits at 28%.Russell 2000 (RUT) and S&P MidCap 400 (MID) have even lower foreign revenue exposure at 21% and 25%, respectively—highlighting their more domestic-focused nature.Mag. 7’s Exposure to Global Trade RisksTech giants such as Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Tesla, and NVIDIA have significant exposure to international markets, particularly in Asia and Europe. This makes them highly susceptible to any U.S. trade protectionism or geopolitical tensions.On the other hand, S&P 493 companies are more insulated from trade volatility, as they derive a larger share of their revenue from the domestic U.S. economy.Investment ImplicationsWith trade policy shifts potentially driving short-term market volatility, investors should carefully assess the risks associated with high foreign revenue dependence and consider strategic portfolio adjustments toward domestic-focused companies.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
AAPL
Apple
+8