logo

홈게시글서비스요금제소개

KO

메뉴

홈
게시글
검색
소개
KO
logo
요금제
logo

Company

AboutTerms of Service Privacy Policy

Social

LinkedIn Twitter Discord

Contact

contact@coresixteen.com coresixteen.com
상호주식회사 코어16
대표조윤남
사업자등록번호762-81-03235
주소서울특별시 영등포구 의사당대로 83, 오투타워 6층
TIGER AGGREGATE BOND ACTIVE
검색 결과
이벤트
user
박재훈투영인
·
5개월 전
0
0
Dow지수, 급등세로 1,100포인트 이상 상승... 월요일 폭락 손실 절반 만회 (2020-03-09)
article
중립
중립
451540
TIGER 종합채권(AA-이상)액티브
+1
user
박재훈투영인
·
5개월 전
0
0
Dow지수, 급등세로 1,100포인트 이상 상승... 월요일 폭락 손실 절반 만회 (2020-03-09)
Stocks could face turbulence and limited gains in the second half of the year, as the Covid-19 pandemic continues to set the course for markets and the economy.The S&P 500 had been up more than 20% for the second quarter before Wednesday’s 2.6% decline, as a surge in virus cases in Florida, Texas and other sunbelt states raised fears that the economic rebound could be slowed.The first half of the year saw stocks rise to new highs amid optimism after the phase one China trade deal, but then plummet in March, as the virus shut down the economy. But a heavy and rapid dose of fiscal and Fed stimulus pulled markets out of a downward spiral, and the Nasdaq led the pack, as the first index to set new highs. The S&P 500, at 3,050, is still down 5.6% for the year-to-date.With just a week left in the second quarter,. the negative news on the virus is a setback and a reminder that the health crisis could continue to dampen economic activity and strain health systems and local government budgets. Some strategists say the market mood is changing, and with the virus spread, the focus may shift to whether and how quickly Congress will approve more economic stimulus.“People who are looking for a magical V [recovery] are delusional,” said Julian Emanuel, head of equities and derivatives strategy at BTIG.  “The delusional part is when you look at the Nasdaq, it made a new all time high.  That’s buoying the public’s optimism and pulled institutions off the sidelines.”Investors jumped into defensive, stay at home stocks, like Netflix, Facebook, Amazon and consumer staples, when the economy was first shut down. But as they became optimistic about the economy recovering, they moved into the beaten down names, like airlines or casinos, and cyclicals like financials and energy to bet on the rebound. All of those stocks were hit Wednesday, as the Dow fell 710 points, off 2.7%.Emanuel said the fact that institutions have put more money into stocks recently means they are no longer underinvested  and compelled to buy. “That’s different than what we saw in May and the first several weeks in June,” when they had to chase performance, he said.“We are now no longer in a mindset where good news is likely tot be interpreted as good news and bad news is likely to be shrugged off,” said  Emanuel. “Bad news will be bad news.”Emanuel expects the S&P to end the year at 3,000, and the market should start setting new highs next year. “The path is going to be extremely volatile. That’s what the VIX above 30 is telling you. Our price target is 3,000. We’re basically going to have a lot of volatility on either side of tat number, and it’s going to be more volatile, not less as we get closer to the election.” The VIX, the CBOE’s Volatility Index, reflects investing in puts and calls in the S&P 500. A higher VIX indicates more volatility, and it jumped more than 7.8% Wednesday to 33.84.Besides the uncertainty surrounding the virus, markets also face uncertainty as the presidential election approaches. Currently, the polls show former Vice President Joe Biden in the lead, ahead of President Donald Trump. Some political strategists believe there is a chance that a strong showing by Biden and the Democrats could result in a blue sweep with Democrats in the White House and both chambers of Congress.Ed Keon, chief investment strategist at QMA, said the market may not react to the November election until after the summer. “Four months is a lifetime in politics,” he said. ’“If you actually look at the party of the president, it doesn’t have very much correlation with the stock market, and if anything it suggests that the market does better under Democrats than Republicans. If Democrats take control, you’re going to see some of the tax cuts reversed and that will probably be taken to be negative.”But in the meantime, the prime focus is on the virus and how it is impacting the economy. Besides the news of a jump in cases in the south and California, the governors of New York, New Jersey and Connecticut announced a quarantine for travelers from hot spot states. That slammed airline stocks and raised concerns of a slower economic recovery.“We were already down and that just took us down another leg,” Keon said. “I’ve been reasonably cautious for awhile. we’ve had some moves up and down, but we’ve pretty much been sideways on the S&P for a month plus.” Liz Ann Sonders, Charles Schwab chief investment strategist, said while there’s been a flat trend, the Nasdaq has bucked it in recent weeks.“Although the Nasdaq hit a new high and has been on a spike, less than 50% of its constituents are trading above the 200-day moving average. That’s the biggest divergence since 2001,” she said. “There are 45% of the Nasdaq trading above the 200 day moving average in a a rally that’s been epic.”The 200-day moving average is a technical measure of momentum. It literally is an average of the last 200 closing prices of a stock or an index, and a move above it is seen as positive momentum.“It’s hard to paint a rosy picture when that’s your classic story of the generals advancing and the soldiers falling behind. I think you add the virus stuff to more attention given to these technical divergences and sentiment being stretched and you have a recipe for a pullback,” she said.Sonders said the virus will steer stocks through the end of the year,  and even with reopenings, the virus could still influence consumer and corporate behavior.“The market in both directions is impacted by the virus,” she said. She pointed to the fact that in just four sessions when there was positive drug or vaccine news, the Dow gained 2,700 points in just those sessions.“What concerns me is the market has gotten pretty frothy,” she said, noting it’s a positive that the small caps given back some gains.“Investors ares positioned very optimistically,”  she said, adding some of the sentiment surveys don’t reflect the level of optimism apparent in investor behavior. “When you get to extremes of sentiment in either direction it often takes less of a catalyst to ignite the naturally contrarian move in the market. That’s what happened in February. I am pleased to see in the last week or two some of the air is coming out of the riskier small cap stocks.”
article
중립
중립
451540
TIGER 종합채권(AA-이상)액티브
+1
경제 & 전략
user
박재훈투영인
·
4개월 전
0
0
알고보니 물가 상승보다 더 위험한 것이 있다?(24.11.12)
article
매도
매도
451540
TIGER 종합채권(AA-이상)액티브
user
박재훈투영인
·
4개월 전
0
0
알고보니 물가 상승보다 더 위험한 것이 있다?(24.11.12)
이번 주에 미국 유권자에 대해 중요한 것을 배웠습니다.​사람들은 인플레이션에 대해 화가 나 있다는 것입니다.​백악관의 집권당을 몰아낼 만큼 화가 나 있었습니다.​월스트리트저널과 AP VoteCast에 따르면, 유권자의 96%가 “가스, 식료품 및 기타 물품의 높은 가격”이 그들의 투표에 영향을 미쳤다고 말했습니다. 이는 매우 놀라운 숫자입니다. 특히, 높은 물가가 안정적인 고용 시장과 건강한 임금 성장 속에서도 발생했다는 점을 고려하면 더욱 그렇습니다.​2022년의 인플레이션 위기는 가장 최근의 경제적 상처이며, 이번 주 화요일의 선거는 그 상처가 여전히 생생하다는 첫 신호였습니다. 미국인들은 경제적 부담감과 주식 시장에 대해 아무리 많은 글을 써도, 높은 물가를 쉽게 잊지 못합니다.​왜 인플레이션이 여전히 미국인들의 마음속에 큰 문제로 남아 있는지에 대한 몇 가지 뒤늦은 깨달음이 있습니다.​하지만 앞으로 우리에게 닥칠 가장 큰 위협은 인플레이션이 아닐 수 있습니다.​대신, 메인스트리트에서 백악관에 이르기까지 모든 사람이 가격 폭등을 두려워하기 때문에 인플레이션이 없는 세상(a wrold without inflation)이라는 개념일 수 있습니다.​가격이 상승하지 않는, 즉 인플레이션이 없는 세상을 상상하는 것은 복잡한 일입니다.​하나의 이유로, 다양한 형태의 인플레이션은 지난 수십 년 동안 미국에서 대부분 존재해 왔습니다.​1948년 이후, 일반 소비재 및 서비스 가격 변화를 측정하는 가장 잘 알려진 방법인 소비자물가지수(CPI)는 전년 대비 약 95%의 기간 동안 증가했습니다.그리고 이는 대체로 긍정적인 일이었습니다. 건강한 경제에서는 더 많은 미국인이 고용되고 좋은 임금을 받습니다. 그들은 더 많이 소비하며, 기업들은 가격을 조정해 이를 따라갑니다. 지난 30년 동안 우유 한 갤런의 평균 가격이 $2.50에서 $4로 급등했지만, 평균 노동자의 시간당 임금도 $12에서 $30로 증가했습니다.​디플레이션(전년 대비 가격이 하락한 드문 5%의 기간)은 2차 세계 대전 이후 호황이 끝났을 때와 글로벌 금융 위기 후에 발생했습니다. 둘 다 높은 실업률과 급격한 시장 하락이 특징인 고통스러운 시기였습니다.​이 맥락은 중요하다고 생각하지만, 인플레이션에 대한 개념이 지금 세상이 필요한 것은 아니라는 것도 압니다. 경제적 부담은 많은 미국인들에게 큰 문제이며, 월스트리트는 이를 맥락, 세부사항, 논리로 해결하려 했습니다(저 역시 그 죄에서 자유롭지 않습니다).​하지만, 주간 식료품 청구서가 25% 더 비싸고, 모기지 비용이 두 배로 증가하며, 미국의 꿈이 손가락 사이로 빠져나가는 것을 느낄 때, 맥락과 세부사항은 힘을 잃습니다. 경제적 절망감은 미국인들을 벼랑 끝으로 내몰았고, 우리는 합리적인 개혁이 필요합니다.​그럼에도 불구하고, 인플레이션을 악마화하는 것만으로는 충분하지 않습니다.​경제의 한 부분(예를들어 인플레이션)을 최적화하는 것은 다른 부분을 우선순위에서 제외하는 것을 의미합니다. 모든 것이 tradeoff의 문제입니다. 그리고 현재, 물가 안정을 우선시하는 것은 우리가 다른 분야에서 큰 희생을 감수해야 할 수도 있음을 의미합니다.​tradeoff가 우리를 여기까지 오게 했습니다. 2022년 인플레이션이 9%로 급등한 이유 중 하나는 COVID 팬데믹 동안 정책 입안자들이 일자리 시장과 공중 보건을 우선시하기로 선택했기 때문입니다.금리를 통제하는 안경을 낀 경제학자들, 즉 연방준비제도와 의회는 정부의 의무적인 폐쇄 동안 미국인들이 재정적 어려움에 직면하지 않도록 하기 위해 특별한 조치를 취했습니다.​대규모 금리 인하, 중소기업 대출, 모기지 압류 유예, 학자금 대출 이자 면제—그리고 무엇보다도, 미국인들에게 직접 발송된 4억 7,600만 장의 경기부양 수표. 아무런 조건 없는 '공짜' 돈이었습니다.​이 모든 조치는 치솟는 인플레이션을 촉발할 위험을 안고 있었습니다—결국 우리가 직면해야 했던 결과입니다. 우리가 명백히 용납할 수 없는 현실이었습니다.​앞으로 몇 달간, 기업, 정치인, 소비자들이 또 다른 인플레이션 위기가 발생하지 않도록 복잡한 대책을 세울 가능성도 충분히 있습니다.​인플레이션 없는 세상이라면, 그 대가는 무엇일까요?(A world without inflation, but at what cost?)​여러분의 일자리입니다. 일자리와 물가의 복잡한 균형을 이해합니다. 인플레이션은 모두에게 영향을 미치지만, 실업은 인구의 일부에만 영향을 미칩니다. 결국, 2008년 금융위기 절정기에도 일할 나이의 미국인 10명 중 9명은 여전히 일자리를 가지고 있었습니다.​그럼에도 불구하고, 이는 파괴적인 교환입니다. COVID 이후의 일자리 시장 회복은 역사상 가장 빠른 회복 중 하나였습니다. COVID 기간 동안의 연준과 의회의 노력은 우리를 단지 고용 상태로 유지한 것만이 아니라, 수십 년 만에 최고의 협상력을 직원들에게 제공했습니다.인플레이션에 집중하면 일자리 시장이 더 취약해지며, 대량 실업은 관련된 모든 사람들에게 특히 피해가 큰 상황입니다.​위기 대응 도구. 경제 문제를 해결하는 방법은 두 가지가 있습니다: 통화 정책(통화 공급 및 금리)과 재정 정책(지출 및 과세)입니다. 연준은 통화 정책을 통제하며, 의회는 재정 정책을 통제합니다. 어려운 시기에는 이 두 기관이 각자의 도구를 사용하여 문제를 공동으로 해결할 수 있습니다.​이제는 다릅니다. 연준은 법적으로 물가 상승과 고용의 균형을 맞출 의무가 있으므로, 연준 의장 제롬 파월이 그 일을 책임지고 있습니다. 의회는 어떨까요? 그럴 수도 아닐 수도 있습니다. 2022년의 인플레이션 재발에 대한 두려움은 향후 지출 패키지를 제한할 수 있습니다. 사용 가능한 도구가 줄어들면 경기부양책으로 완화되지 않는, 더 고통스럽고 장기화된 위기가 발생할 수 있습니다.​큰 상승과 큰 하락. 우리는 극단의 시대에 살고 있습니다. 높은 고점, 낮은 저점, 시끄러운 소음, 전례 없는 시대. 최근 몇 십 년 동안 금융 시장은 매우 극단적인 상황에 이르렀습니다: 대공황 이후 최악의 주식 시장 붕괴, COVID 기간 중 역사상 가장 빠른 주식 시장 붕괴가 그 예입니다.정보는 그 어느 때보다 빠르게 이동하며, 우리는 단 몇 번의 휴대전화 스와이프만으로 거래할 수 있습니다. 정부는 위기의 영향을 완화할 수 있는 유연성이 필요하지만, 인플레이션에 대한 두려움이 망설임을 초래할 수 있습니다. 결국, 정부 개입이 줄어들면 신뢰도의 급격한 변화와 더 큰 가격 변동이 나타날 수 있습니다. 투자 포트폴리오의 완충 장치가 필요할 겁니다, 친구.​금리. 위기 상황에서 연준이 지나치게 대응해야 한다면, 금리를 더욱 인하해야 할 가능성이 큽니다. 거기에 포트폴리오 완충 장치로서 채권에 대한 수요 증가가 더해지면, 정부 부채로의 급격한 이동이 발생합니다. 이는 주택담보대출 금리에는 좋지만, 저축 계좌에는 그다지 유리하지 않습니다.​혁신. 미국은 혁신 면에서 세계 최고이기 때문에 이 이야기를 꺼내는 것이 안타깝습니다. 하지만 경영진, 정치인, 발명가들이 비용에 더 집중하면, 경제를 성장시키고 강화하는 아이디어에 대한 여지가 줄어듭니다. 좋은 사업가는 누구나 균형이 중요하다고 말할 것이지만, 최근 몇 년간 자국 내 혁신을 촉진하는 정부 정책은 매우 성공적이었습니다 (안녕하세요, CHIPS법 및 인플레이션 감축법). 인플레이션이 우선순위가 되면, 급진적이고 효과적인 아이디어를 시도할 기회가 줄어듭니다.​진정한 OptimistiCallie(낙관적) 스타일로, 이 격정적인 글을 긍정적인 기운으로 마무리하고 싶습니다.​저는 여전히 미국을 믿습니다. 장기 투자 포트폴리오를 팔고 코스타리카로 이주할 계획도 없습니다 (이 시기에 꽤 좋다고 들었지만요).​하지만 앞으로 몇 달 동안, 인플레이션을 악마화하는 데 따르는 교환의 대가를 직시해야 할 것입니다.​경제적 부담은 복잡한 문제입니다.​인플레이션이 없는 세상을 추구한다고 해서 우리가 그 목표에 도달할 수 있는 것은 아닙니다.
article
매도
매도
451540
TIGER 종합채권(AA-이상)액티브
user
박재훈투영인
·
5개월 전
0
0
억만장자 투자자 배리 스턴릭트, 미 경제 장기 전망 우려 표명(2021-5-13)
article
중립
중립
451540
TIGER 종합채권(AA-이상)액티브
user
박재훈투영인
·
5개월 전
0
0
억만장자 투자자 배리 스턴릭트, 미 경제 장기 전망 우려 표명(2021-5-13)
Global investor Barry Sternlicht told CNBC on Thursday he has some long-term concerns about the U.S. economy, saying there are risks beyond the immediate boom from the Covid recovery.In a wide-ranging interview on “Squawk Box,” the billionaire businessman worried about numerous shortages in the economy and criticized the Federal Reserve’s highly accommodative monetary policy policy and legislative proposals in Washington.“I do think the Fed, interest rates, are being suppressed by the government. .... We have to get off of this sugar-cane and Fluffernutter economy and get to the meat-and-the-potatoes economy,” Sternlicht said. “We have to get back to a sustainable economy and people coming back to work.”The chairman and CEO of Starwood Capital Group pointed to recent Labor Department data that showed a record number of job openings in March. “Something is wrong,” he said.Sternlicht, whose firm operates hotels as part of its broader portfolio, said hiring challenges for businesses are largely the result of enhanced unemployment benefits that were included in a federal coronavirus relief package.However, economists say the reason people may still be hesitant to return to work is due to many factors, including Covid concerns and a lack of reliable child care.The supply-chain challenges that have hit numerous industries including poultry and lumber are worrisome, Sternlicht said, and so are the delays at cargo ports.“You’re seeing unbelievable shortages in the U.S. economy from chicken wings to sheet rock to curtain wall to couches that everyone is ordering on Pottery Barn and West Elm that they can’t get for six months because they’re all coming from China,” Sternlicht said. “So what we did was write a giant stimulus package and now we’re shopping and buying everything from offshore. We’re not doing anything to fix long-term issues in the U.S. economy.”Sternlicht noted that some of the shortages will resolve over time as the immediate demand surge from the economic reopening wears off, calling it a “bottleneck.”“I will probably be able to get the curtain wall I need for my hotel that we’re building in Nashville. Some day,” he said. “But it has fundamentally changed the economy because of the amount of stimulus.”As the Biden administration proposes a set of legislative packages carrying collective price tags in the trillions, Sternlicht said: “We need precise, laser-like legislation  to help the industries in need and to promote the business investments we want.”The housing market is another area of concern, Sternlicht said. Home sales heated up last year, driven in part by low mortgage rates and workers beginning to have greater geographic flexibility.“The housing market is in an unsustainable, euphoric increase in prices,” Sternlicht said.Sternlicht said the broad economic and political landscape has changed his outlook on the stock market. He noted that during the March 2020 coronavirus-driven plunge, he correctly predicted a swift recovery in equities.“I was wildly bullish. ... I thought we would get through this and the markets would rally, and they did. I’m probably equally negative on the situation almost today. Although the one thing holding stocks up is just the sheer weight of all the money printed around the world and very little places to put it.”
article
중립
중립
451540
TIGER 종합채권(AA-이상)액티브
user
박재훈투영인
·
5개월 전
0
0
데이비드 잉글스: 블룸버그 경제 서프라이즈 지수 하락, 미 경제 예상보다 빠르게 둔화(2024-7-4)
article
중립
중립
451540
TIGER 종합채권(AA-이상)액티브
user
박재훈투영인
·
5개월 전
0
0
데이비드 잉글스: 블룸버그 경제 서프라이즈 지수 하락, 미 경제 예상보다 빠르게 둔화(2024-7-4)
David Ingles@DavidInglesTVAlas, looks like the US economy is cooling quicker than most analysts think. The Bloomberg US Economic Surprise Index has dropped to a 9-year low.
article
중립
중립
451540
TIGER 종합채권(AA-이상)액티브
user
박재훈투영인
·
5개월 전
0
0
채권 거대기업 핌코 경고: 트럼프 재집권 시 미국 경제 '과열' 가능성(2024-11-8)
article
매도
매도
451540
TIGER 종합채권(AA-이상)액티브
user
박재훈투영인
·
5개월 전
0
0
채권 거대기업 핌코 경고: 트럼프 재집권 시 미국 경제 '과열' 가능성(2024-11-8)
Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found here. https://www.ft.com/content/cc2a0e34-2ee8-4567-945d-7b57bd266844Pimco, one of the world’s biggest bond fund managers, has warned that US president-elect Donald Trump’s economic plans could lead to the economy “overheating” and could halt interest rate cuts, posing a danger for stocks that shot up in the wake of his presidential election victory. Dan Ivascyn, chief investment officer at Pimco, said US equity markets could suffer a reversal after rising sharply on the Republican candidate’s emphatic win. The S&P and Nasdaq Composite indices both surged to fresh record highs this week in anticipation of tax cuts, looser regulation and trade tariffs. But such “reflationary” policies, in a US economy that already has “a lot of momentum”, have the potential to feed through into inflation, he warned. “It’s not as simple and easy as just a one-way reflationary trade where risk assets should rejoice,” Ivascyn told the Financial Times. “You want to be a little careful about what you wish for,” he said. With US inflation still stuck above the Federal Reserve’s target, “there is some risk that some of this exuberance can work its way back into both inflationary expectations or actual inflation”. He said Trump’s policies “are coming at a time where you already have a lot of positive growth momentum, they could lead to this overheating”. Ivascyn’s comments echo concerns held by some other investors and strategists that the reaction to this week’s election result across riskier asset classes stands at odds with the potential for rising inflation and a prolonged period of tight monetary policy. Expectations on the path of US interest rates have been a key driver of US markets in recent years. While the S&P 500 has risen by more than 4 per cent this week, putting it on course for its biggest weekly gain this year, Trump’s victory has also pushed bitcoin to record highs and driven junk bond spreads — the premium paid by low-grade borrowers to issue debt over the Treasury — to a 17-year low. However, government bonds initially sold off sharply earlier this week in expectation of higher inflation, although the 10-year Treasury has since made back those losses after Fed chair Jay Powell said it was too early to know what the substance of Trump’s policies would be. While Ivascyn was not expecting a “massive inflation”, he said Trump’s policies could support growth over the long run and warned that “we certainly could get back to a point where the Fed becomes a bit concerned and where the market begins to price out some of the cuts”. “So, we think that means: be a little careful of risk asset valuations here,” he said. The central bank has already started to slow the pace of monetary policy easing following a flurry of strong economic data in recent weeks, notwithstanding a weak October jobs report distorted by strikes and hurricanes. It cut rates by 0.25 percentage points on Thursday to a target range of 4.5 to 4.75 per cent, having made a jumbo-sized half-point cut as recently as September — the first reduction since 2020. Market pricing this week indicated that traders have also started to scale back their bets on Fed easing for 2025, and now anticipate less than 1 percentage point worth of cuts by the end of next year. Ivascyn said the “bar will be high” for rates to rise again, speaking ahead of the Fed announcement, but “a more realistic scenario will just be them on hold for a lot longer than people realise”. That would not be “a friendly scenario to the commercial real estate market”, he said. “That could present some problems to some of these sectors that have rallied more recently in the hopes of central bank cuts.” Still, even before central bank policymakers need to step in, Ivascyn pointed out that “the markets a lot of times do the heavy lifting for the Fed”, meaning that markets could start to price in a change in the outlook for inflation and rates without the central bank needing to signal this. At a certain stage, bets on rising inflation and elevated interest rates could send Treasury yields up to such a level that they compete with equities as an attractive investment, dampening their appeal, said Ivascyn. “There are practical limits to how high rates can go before they begin to negatively impact risk assets” and “that could lead to a reversal in some of this positive market sentiment, positive economic momentum”, he said. “The markets will be a governor of sorts.”
article
매도
매도
451540
TIGER 종합채권(AA-이상)액티브
user
박재훈투영인
·
5개월 전
0
0
UBS CEO: 관세로 인플레이션 자극되면 금리 인하 예상보다 더딜 것(2025-01-21)
article
중립
중립
451540
TIGER 종합채권(AA-이상)액티브
user
박재훈투영인
·
5개월 전
0
0
UBS CEO: 관세로 인플레이션 자극되면 금리 인하 예상보다 더딜 것(2025-01-21)
An expected decline in interest rates could be stalled if the prospective tariffs of Donald Trump’s second White House administration bleed into markets and shore up inflation, UBS CEO Sergio Ermotti warned Tuesday.“Something that I’ve been saying for a while, inflation is much more sticky than we have been saying,” he told CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. “The [truth] of the matter is that we need to see also how tariffs will play a role in inflation.”“Tariffs will probably not really help inflation to come down. And therefore I don’t see rates coming down as fast as people believe,” he said.Markets have been on alert for the next trade steps of the newly inaugurated Trump, who has threatened to impose 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada, while also floating a separate set of retaliatory trade measures against China in a bid to pressure Beijing to force ByteDance’s sale of TikTok.Historical ally Europe is also on the look-out for potential U.S. protectionism in commerce, as Trump progresses his “America First” agenda.Inflation has been cooling in most major global economies, after a period of heated price growth propelled by the Covid-19 pandemic and an energy crisis driven by the war in Ukraine. Europe, the U.K. and the U.S. all finally began their respective cutting cycles last year.In Trump’s home territory, U.S. inflation edged higher in December, rising to 2.9% year-on-year from 2.7% in November. The latest minutes of the U.S. Federal Reserve December meeting pointed to an outlook of just two interest rate cuts in 2025, down from a previous estimate of four such trims during the September gathering, assuming quarter-point adjustments.A high-interest rate environment often benefits the commercial banking sector — whose U.S. lenders could also stand to benefit from a competitive edge against European counterparts, if Trump materializes his pledge of a lighter touch on regulation.“I don’t believe we’re going to see a lot of deregulation,” Ermotti said Tuesday. “Probably we won’t see more regulation, we won’t see overlapping new regulation that is in conflict with existing regulation.”He added that he did not believe banks should be “massively deregulated,” but noted it is “very important that we don’t get new unnecessary regulation.”Big fish in a small pondUBS has encountered friction with regulators in its Swiss home base, after exiting the umbrage of a tumultuous government-backed marriage with embattled rival Credit Suisse in 2023. The bank has been contending with concerns that it has become a large fish in the vulnerable pond of the Swiss economy, which already battles a strong franc and plunging inflation.“If you look at the numbers alone and compare UBS with the Swiss economy, it is too big,” former Swiss Finance Minister Ueli Maurer said Jan. 10 in an interview with Swiss newspaper Tages-Anzeiger, according to a Google translation. “Therefore, the risk must be reduced. This is primarily down to the shareholders, who elect the bodies and are liable with their capital. They must take responsibility, not the taxpayers in the end. Legislative measures must also be examined.”Topping $1.7 trillion in 2023, UBS’ balance sheet is around double Switzerland’s anticipated economic output for last year — meaning its potential failure at any point would deprive the lender of local rivals to absorb it, pose risks of disruption to the Swiss economy and strand the Bern government with a hefty bill to foot in the event of nationalization.Ermotti has previously defended that his bank is not “too big to fail” — while the government last April recommended that UBS and three other systematically relevant lenders must face tougher capital requirements to safeguard the national economy.Since then, the bank posted a sweeping beat in the third quarter, with net profit attributable to shareholders coming in at $1.43 billion, compared with a mean forecast of $667.5 million in a LSEG poll of analysts. The lender’s revenue for the period hit $12.33 billion, also above analyst expectations near $11.78 billion. The group is set to publish fourth-quarter results on Feb. 4.
article
중립
중립
451540
TIGER 종합채권(AA-이상)액티브