logo

HomeArticlesServicePriceAbout

EN

Menu

Home
Articles
Search
About
EN
logo
logo

Company

AboutTerms of Service Privacy Policy

Social

LinkedIn Twitter Discord

Contact

contact@coresixteen.com coresixteen.com
Company NameCORE16 Inc.
CEODavid Cho
Business Registration Number762-81-03235
Address83, Uisadang-daero, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07325, Republic of KOREA
셀스마트 자민's profile picture

셀스마트 자민

gjinbae286@gmail.com

user
셀스마트 자민
·
3 months ago
1
0
China Accelerates Energy Ties Beyond the U.S., Turns to Canada (Apr 17, 2025)
China has slashed crude oil imports from the U.S. by nearly 90% while simultaneously boosting imports from Canada to record levels, according to Vortexa data. In March alone, China imported 7.3 million barrels of oil from British Columbia ports, marking the highest monthly volume on record.This shift is largely seen as a response to escalating U.S.-China trade tensions and the Trump administration’s aggressive tariff policies. The completion of the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion (TMX) has improved access to Canada's western oil sands, enabling China to diversify its energy supply lines away from the U.S. Notably, Chinese imports of U.S. crude have plummeted from a peak of 29 million barrels per month in June 2024 to just 3 million barrels.Beyond simple substitution, China appears to be strategically broadening its economic ties with non-U.S. energy partners, reducing reliance on traditional suppliers like Russia and the Middle East. Canadian heavy crude offers a cost-effective alternative to Middle Eastern oil, making it an attractive option for Asia's advanced refining infrastructure. This evolving trade pattern could significantly reshape the global energy landscape and diminish America's influence over global energy flows.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Sell
Sell
NONE
No Relevant Stock
user
셀스마트 자민
·
3 months ago
0
0
Tesla Soars, but UBS Says “No Fundamental Justification” (Apr 10, 2025)
Tesla (TSLA) shares surged ahead of its upcoming Q1 earnings report on April 22, but UBS remains skeptical.UBS analyst Joseph Spak stated that Tesla’s 22% rally on April 9—following the reciprocal tariff suspension announcement—is not supported by fundamentals.UBS believes market expectations remain overly optimistic, and sees a high likelihood that Tesla will lower its forward guidance during the Q1 earnings call.Of particular concern is the energy storage segment, which has seen recent growth but now faces supply chain risks due to the new 125% tariff on Chinese imports—a key source of materials.Reflecting these risks, UBS maintained its “Sell” rating on Tesla and cut its price target from $225 to $190, citing continued uncertainty in earnings visibility and supply stability.UBS recommends caution in interpreting the recent rally as sustainable.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Sell
Sell
TSLA
Tesla
user
셀스마트 자민
·
3 months ago
0
0
GM Faces $5 Billion in Annual Tariff Costs — UBS Cuts Price Target by 20% (Apr 10, 2025)
UBS has downgraded its rating on General Motors (GM) from Buy to Neutral, citing mounting cost pressure under the Trump administration’s new high-tariff policy. The bank also cut its price target from $64 to $51, a reduction of roughly 20%.UBS analysts noted that many GM vehicles are assembled in Canada and Mexico, with an estimated $35,000 worth of components per vehicle. Assuming 50% of those parts are foreign-sourced and applying a 25% tariff rate on imported parts, GM's annual tariff burden could reach approximately $5 billion.UBS also warned that domestic auto demand may soften, further weighing on GM’s earnings outlook. With GM’s Q1 2025 earnings report due on April 29, this downgrade could heighten market sensitivity ahead of the results.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Strong Sell
Strong Sell
GM
General Motors
user
셀스마트 자민
·
3 months ago
0
0
U.S. Bitcoin Spot ETFs See Massive Outflows in March, Market Faces Continued Downward Pressure (Mar 19, 2025)
U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs have experienced significant outflows throughout March, intensifying downward pressure on the market. According to Farside Investors, more than $1.6 billion exited Bitcoin spot ETFs in the first 17 days of March, while inflows during the same period totaled only $351 million.BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) saw $552 million in outflows, while Fidelity’s Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) lost $517 million, making them the most impacted funds. Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) also recorded over $200 million in outflows, with minimal new inflows. However, Grayscale’s Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) showed a net inflow of $55 million, marking an exception to the overall trend.Bitcoin remains unable to break through the $85,000 resistance level, fluctuating between $84,000 and $85,200 amid investor caution ahead of the Federal Reserve’s FOMC meeting. The market currently estimates a 99% probability that interest rates will remain at 4.25%–4.50%, while discussions on ending quantitative tightening (QT) could play a crucial role in Bitcoin’s price movements.In a bearish scenario, if Bitcoin falls below $78,000, the likelihood of further declines increases, with $74,000 expected to act as a key support level. In an extreme downturn, prices could drop to the $71,300–$73,800 range, where a potential rebound would determine the market’s next direction. Conversely, in a bullish scenario, breaking above $85,000 could open the door for further gains toward $90,000 and beyond.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
BTC
Bitcoin
user
셀스마트 자민
·
4 months ago
0
0
Estimating the Implied Equity Risk Premium (ERP) in U.S. Stock Market Risk-Return Models (Mar 18, 2019)
"Risk and Return Models for Equity Markets and Implied Equity Risk Premium"This study analyzes methodologies for estimating the Implied Equity Risk Premium (ERP), a key factor in equity market risk-return models, and evaluates the limitations of traditional approaches.1. Research ObjectivesUtilize Google Trends search volume data and other market indicators to empirically analyze ERP in the U.S. stock market.Examine financial analysts’ and investors’ approaches to equity return estimation and compare their effectiveness relative to benchmarks.Explore the relationship between capital investment, earnings expectations, and long-term bond yields.2. Research MethodologyCollected data from 1988 to 2009:S&P 500 index, 6-month Treasury bills, and 10-year Treasury bonds.Applied various ERP estimation methods, including:Historical returns approachSurvey-based expectationsDCF (Discounted Cash Flow) model-based ERP estimatesConducted OLS (Ordinary Least Squares) regression analysis to evaluate the relationships between key variables.3. Key Findings1) ERP Estimation is Highly UnstableUsing the DCF model, ERP estimates were inconsistent and highly volatile across different time periods.In some cases, the estimated ERP was negative, highlighting the sensitivity of ERP calculations to model assumptions and input data.2) Model LimitationsChallenges in long-term growth forecasting:The model struggles to predict long-term economic growth trends, making ERP estimates unreliable.Inability to capture short-term volatility:The approach fails to incorporate market shocks or investor sentiment fluctuations.Mismatch with investor expectations:The model may not accurately reflect how investors form risk-return expectations in real markets.3) Limited Data CoverageThe study relied on a relatively short sample period (1988-2009).Extending the dataset could improve the robustness of ERP estimates.ConclusionThis study highlights the difficulties in estimating ERP using traditional models, emphasizing that:ERP estimation is complex and highly sensitive to model choice and data inputs.Existing methods fail to consistently capture investor expectations and market conditions.Future research should explore more advanced models and incorporate alternative data sources (e.g., Google Trends).[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
NONE
No Relevant Stock
user
셀스마트 자민
·
4 months ago
0
0
The Effects of Market Properties on Portfolio Diversification in the Korean and Japanese Stock Markets (Sep 4, 2021)
"The Effects of Market Properties on Portfolio Diversification in the Korean and Japanese Stock Markets"This study empirically examines how market properties affect portfolio diversification in the Korean and Japanese stock markets.1. Research ObjectivesAnalyze whether the degree of diversification in Markowitz portfolios is influenced by market properties.Explore whether Random Matrix Theory (RMT) can improve portfolio management by controlling for market-driven correlations.2. Research MethodologyUsed KOSPI 200 stock data (Jan 1980 - Jun 2015) and Nikkei 225 stock data (Jan 1983 - Dec 2000).Included periods of market crashes to assess the impact of crises.Collected returns, market capitalization, and investor trading data.Compared correlation matrices with and without market factor control using RMT.Measured intra-portfolio correlation (IPC) and concentration coefficient (CC) to assess diversification.3. Key Findings1.Market factor influence increases during crises:Empirical evidence shows that during market instability, stocks move more in sync with the overall market rather than independently.2.Diversification decreases in volatile markets:When market factor influence is strong, Markowitz optimal portfolios become more concentrated in fewer stocks.This suggests that diversification weakens during periods of high market uncertainty.3.RMT-based portfolios improve diversification:Removing market-driven correlations using RMT results in better portfolio diversification.RMT-based portfolios exhibit lower risk than traditional Markowitz portfolios, highlighting RMT’s potential to enhance portfolio theory.4.Eigenvalue analysis in Japan’s stock market:The largest eigenvalue was positively correlated (96.58%) with IPC and negatively correlated (-73.84%) with CC.This means that as market factor influence grows, portfolio diversification weakens.ConclusionThis study confirms that as market factor influence grows, portfolio diversification declines.Using RMT to control market-driven correlations improves portfolio diversification, making it an effective tool for addressing the limitations of traditional portfolio theory.The findings suggest that RMT-based portfolio construction may be particularly useful in high-volatility environments.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
NONE
No Relevant Stock
user
셀스마트 자민
·
4 months ago
0
0
Don't Panic! NVIDIA Earnings Strategy by Core16 (Feb 27, 2025)
The upcoming Q4 earnings report is a critical event that could shape the AI semiconductor market. As NVIDIA faces its first major test since the DeepSeek incident, global investors are closely watching whether the company can reassure the market with strong results or fall short of expectations, triggering a broader tech sector correction. Core16 has conducted a comprehensive quantitative and qualitative analysis to help investors navigate this earnings season.Significance of This Earnings ReportFirst Earnings Report Since DeepSeek’s AI Model AnnouncementIn late January, Chinese AI startup DeepSeek introduced a large-scale AI model, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability of NVIDIA’s high-end GPU business model. As a result, NVIDIA’s stock plummeted 17% in a single day. This earnings release will be crucial in proving NVIDIA’s resilience following the DeepSeek shock.Impact of Mass Production of 'Blackwell' AI ChipsNVIDIA began mass-producing its latest AI data center GPU architecture, Blackwell, in late 2024. This earnings call will provide insights into the success of Blackwell’s market adoption and its contribution to NVIDIA’s revenue growth.Given these factors, this report is seen as a major inflection point in the AI semiconductor industry. The battle between AI optimization technologies (like DeepSeek) and high-performance GPU demand will be a key focus, with NVIDIA’s earnings serving as a decisive indicator.Broader Impact on Tech StocksAs a megacap stock with significant market influence, NVIDIA’s earnings can drive the overall tech sector. While the correlation between NVIDIA and the S&P 500 has dropped from 71% to 30% since the DeepSeek incident, NVIDIA’s psychological impact on market sentiment remains strong.If earnings exceed expectations, tech stocks could see a renewed rally.If earnings disappoint, the entire sector’s risk appetite may decline, leading to broader weakness.Market Consensus & Earnings ForecastThe market consensus for NVIDIA’s Q4 earnings:Revenue: ~$38 billion (+72% YoY)EPS: $0.84However, some analysts have raised concerns about slowing growth in the traditional GPU business and headwinds from U.S. export restrictions to China. Overall, the market sees this earnings report as a key test for the AI semiconductor investment cycle, with expectations that NVIDIA will meet or exceed forecasts.Historical Earnings Patterns & Expected Price MovementsIf an Earnings Surprise (EPS Beat) Occurs5 trading days after earnings: Historically, NVIDIA’s stock rises +2.21% on average after a surprise.20 trading days after earnings: Mid-term gains tend to persist, with an average return of +3.69%.If an Earnings Shock (EPS Miss) Occurs5 trading days after earnings: While a decline is likely, partial rebounds have been observed, with an average return of +0.19%.20 trading days after earnings: Even after short-term weakness, mid-term recovery has been strong, with an average gain of +6.74%.Investor StrategyIf NVIDIA Reports an Earnings SurpriseConsider partial profit-taking if the stock surges post-earnings.Since a continued uptrend is likely, holding for mid-term gains may be a better strategy.If short-term pullbacks occur after the announcement, use dips as buying opportunities.If NVIDIA Reports an Earnings ShockImmediate post-earnings volatility is likely to be high, so a wait-and-see approach is advisable.As a mid-term rebound (20 days later) is historically strong, a dollar-cost averaging (DCA) strategy could be effective if the stock declines significantly.Rather than reacting to short-term price swings, investors should focus on the long-term trend and position strategically based on historical patterns.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
NVDA
NVIDIA
user
셀스마트 자민
·
4 months ago
0
0
World’s Second-Largest Household Debt: Is Korea’s Monetary Policy Being Hindered? (Mar 17, 2025)
As of the end of last year, South Korea’s household debt-to-GDP ratio stood at 91.7%, ranking it second in the world. Although it has maintained high levels—surpassing 100% for four consecutive years since 2020 (with Canada at 100.6%)—a recent statistical reorganization for the previous year showed a slight decline. Nonetheless, the ratio remains significantly above the emerging market average (46.0%) and the global average (60.3%).The surge in household debt is complicating the Bank of Korea’s monetary policy. According to the BOE’s “Analysis of Household Credit Accumulation Risks and Policy Implications” report, higher household credit ratios are associated with lower GDP growth and an increased likelihood of recession in both the medium and short term. One of the primary reasons the Monetary Policy Board hesitated to cut the benchmark rate last year was concern over high household debt and an overheated real estate market.Recently, policies such as the lifting of land transaction restrictions in designated areas have led to increased real estate activity, particularly in the Seoul region. Experts warn that this uptick in transactions could trigger a sharp rise in household loans in two to three months. If such a surge occurs, the Bank of Korea will face significant pressure when considering future rate cuts.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
NONE
No Relevant Stock
user
셀스마트 자민
·
4 months ago
0
0
Bitcoin Dominance Surges While Altcoins Decline – Market Shift Underway? (Mar 16, 2025)
The cryptocurrency market is witnessing a significant shift as Bitcoin’s dominance rises sharply while major altcoins experience declining market shares. According to the latest data, Bitcoin’s market dominance has surged from 54% at the end of last year to 60.6%, while leading altcoins Ethereum and Solana have dropped from 12.45% to 8.5% and from 2.82% to 2.51%, respectively. Meanwhile, the total cryptocurrency market capitalization has shrunk by nearly 20%, amplifying concerns over market-wide instability.This shift reflects investors reallocating funds toward more stable assets, as stablecoins pegged to the U.S. dollar have gained market share, indicating a growing risk-averse sentiment. Analysts suggest that structural limitations and network constraints in the altcoin space are further contributing to this trend, leading to heightened short-term volatility.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
BTC
Bitcoin
+2
user
셀스마트 자민
·
4 months ago
0
0
Moody’s Maintains Negative Outlook on Korean Banks (Mar 14, 2025)
Global credit rating agency Moody’s has maintained a negative outlook on South Korean banks, citing deteriorating operating conditions, asset quality, and profitability over the next 12 to 18 months. The agency warns that weak consumer spending, a sluggish construction sector, and slowing export growth are driving concerns over rising loan delinquency rates and worsening asset quality.Moody’s forecasts South Korea’s real GDP growth to decline to 1.6% in 2025, significantly below the long-term average of 2.5%. The report also highlights political uncertainty, weak job growth, and a struggling real estate market, which are expected to dampen consumer sentiment and weigh on overall economic performance.Key Risks for Korean BanksAsset Quality: Delinquency rates in small business loans and unsecured personal loans are expected to remain around 0.5%, posing a broader financial sector risk. Despite regulatory measures such as stress capital buffers and Liquidity Coverage Ratios (LCRs), Korean banks still lag behind their global peers in terms of capital strength.Profitability: Return on Average Assets (ROAA) is projected to decline to 0.5-0.6%, while Net Interest Margin (NIM) is expected to shrink from 1.6% to 1.5%. Though loan-loss provisions remain stable, weak profitability and deteriorating financial health of non-banking affiliates within financial groups pose additional risks.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
NONE
No Relevant Stock
user
셀스마트 자민
·
3 months ago
China Accelerates Energy Ties Beyond the U.S., Turns to Canada (Apr 17, 2025)
article
Sell
Sell
NONE
No Relevant Stock
user
셀스마트 자민
·
3 months ago
Tesla Soars, but UBS Says “No Fundamental Justification” (Apr 10, 2025)
article
Sell
Sell
TSLA
Tesla
user
셀스마트 자민
·
3 months ago
GM Faces $5 Billion in Annual Tariff Costs — UBS Cuts Price Target by 20% (Apr 10, 2025)
article
Strong Sell
Strong Sell
GM
General Motors
user
셀스마트 자민
·
3 months ago
U.S. Bitcoin Spot ETFs See Massive Outflows in March, Market Faces Continued Downward Pressure (Mar 19, 2025)
article
Neutral
Neutral
BTC
Bitcoin
user
셀스마트 자민
·
4 months ago
Estimating the Implied Equity Risk Premium (ERP) in U.S. Stock Market Risk-Return Models (Mar 18, 2019)
article
Neutral
Neutral
NONE
No Relevant Stock
user
셀스마트 자민
·
4 months ago
The Effects of Market Properties on Portfolio Diversification in the Korean and Japanese Stock Markets (Sep 4, 2021)
article
Neutral
Neutral
NONE
No Relevant Stock
user
셀스마트 자민
·
4 months ago
Don't Panic! NVIDIA Earnings Strategy by Core16 (Feb 27, 2025)
article
Neutral
Neutral
NVDA
NVIDIA
user
셀스마트 자민
·
4 months ago
World’s Second-Largest Household Debt: Is Korea’s Monetary Policy Being Hindered? (Mar 17, 2025)
article
Neutral
Neutral
NONE
No Relevant Stock
user
셀스마트 자민
·
4 months ago
Bitcoin Dominance Surges While Altcoins Decline – Market Shift Underway? (Mar 16, 2025)
article
Neutral
Neutral
BTC
Bitcoin
+2
user
셀스마트 자민
·
4 months ago
Moody’s Maintains Negative Outlook on Korean Banks (Mar 14, 2025)
article
Neutral
Neutral
NONE
No Relevant Stock