logo

HomeArticlesServicePriceAbout

EN

Menu

Home
Articles
Search
About
EN
logo
Price
logo

Company

AboutTerms of Service Privacy Policy

Social

LinkedIn Twitter Discord

Contact

contact@coresixteen.com coresixteen.com
Company NameCORE16 Inc.
CEODavid Cho
Business Registration Number762-81-03235
Address83, Uisadang-daero, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07325, Republic of KOREA
Ford Motor
Search Result
Firm
user
박재훈투영인
·
2 months ago
0
0
Toyota Hit Hardest by Trump Tariffs Among Global Carmakers (May 11, 2025)
article
Sell
Sell
TM
Toyota Motor ADR Rep 10
user
박재훈투영인
·
2 months ago
0
0
Toyota Hit Hardest by Trump Tariffs Among Global Carmakers (May 11, 2025)
Toyota Motor Corp. (TM), the world’s largest automaker, is also the biggest casualty of Donald Trump’s auto-related trade war.Tariffs on imported cars and parts forced General Motors Co. to cut annual earnings guidance by up to $5 billion, while Ford Motor Co. faces a $1.5 billion hit. Toyota alone reported a $1.2 billion profit drop in just two months. The Japanese automaker now expects operating profit of 3.8 trillion yen ($26.1 billion) for the fiscal year ending March 2026, well below the 4.7 trillion yen analysts had forecast.Although Toyota has increased its U.S. production to cover over half of its sales in the country, it still depends heavily on imported models and components—about 1.2 million units annually. The White House has taken notice, and Trump named Toyota specifically in his controversial "Liberation Day" speech on April 2."Tariff-related details are still extremely fluid," said Toyota CEO Koji Sato last week. "It’s difficult to take concrete action or assess the impact right now."Japan’s chief trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa noted on April 30 that one Japanese automaker is losing about $1 million per hour due to current tariffs. That estimate aligns with Toyota’s expected $1.2 billion loss over a standard 730-hour month.Most imported vehicles became subject to a 25% U.S. tariff starting April 3, and most auto parts followed under the new duties as of May 3. Given that the U.S. remains the largest market for Japan’s top five carmakers, even modest tariff hikes could have oversized impacts on profitability.On May 8, the Trump administration reached its first trade agreement with the UK. In contrast, the U.S. posted a $68.5 billion goods trade deficit with Japan last year, compared to an $11.9 billion surplus with the UK.Some Japanese automakers are already repositioning global production to adjust. Nissan has halted U.S. orders for SUVs made in Mexico. Honda is shifting production of its hybrid Civic from Japan to the U.S.Toyota has made significant investments to expand its U.S. operations, including $13.9 billion for a new battery plant in North Carolina. However, the company is also committed to maintaining a robust domestic production base, with Chairman Akio Toyoda pledging to keep annual production in Japan at 3 million units.Globally, Toyota sold 10.8 million vehicles in 2024, with the U.S. accounting for just under one-quarter of the total. About half were produced locally, another 30% came from Canada and Mexico, and 281,000 units were imported directly from Japan.Toyota’s best-selling U.S. models—the RAV4 hybrid crossover and the Corolla sedan—are assembled in Kentucky and Mississippi, respectively. But the gasoline-only RAV4 is imported from Canada, and the plug-in hybrid version comes from Japan.This exposure has made Toyota a target of Trump’s policies, and the automaker’s fortunes are now closely tied to the outcome of U.S.–Japan trade talks.One major issue Toyota faces is limited production flexibility within the U.S. Its Kentucky Georgetown plant is already running at nearly full capacity as of late April, leaving little room to shift additional vehicle output from overseas.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Sell
Sell
TM
Toyota Motor ADR Rep 10
user
셀스마트 판다
·
4 months ago
0
0
Tesla’s Throne Shaken: Sales Down 11%, GM Surges 36% (Mar 13, 2025)
article
Neutral
Neutral
TSLA
Tesla
+2
user
셀스마트 판다
·
4 months ago
0
0
Tesla’s Throne Shaken: Sales Down 11%, GM Surges 36% (Mar 13, 2025)
In January 2025, traditional automakers General Motors (GM) and Ford recorded strong sales growth in the U.S. electric vehicle (EV) market, while market leader Tesla struggled with a significant decline in sales. GM and Ford saw a 36% year-over-year increase in EV sales, expanding their market share.In contrast, Tesla's sales dropped by 11% year-over-year to 43,411 units, with its market share plummeting to 42.5%. This marks the first time Tesla's U.S. market share has fallen below 50%, signaling a serious challenge to its leadership position.A key factor behind Tesla's decline is CEO Elon Musk’s political involvement as he simultaneously holds a cabinet position in the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) while implementing mass layoffs in the public sector. This has led to negative public sentiment, which in turn has hurt Tesla’s brand image and sales. If Tesla fails to differentiate itself from rising competitors, its sales decline may persist in the long run, despite overall EV market growth.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
TSLA
Tesla
+2
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Ford finalizes sale of Jaguar, Land Rover to Tata Motors(Jan 2, 2008 )
article
Sell
Sell
F
Ford Motor
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Ford finalizes sale of Jaguar, Land Rover to Tata Motors(Jan 2, 2008 )
Ford Motor Co. has finalized the agreement to sell its storied Jaguar and Land Rover businesses to Tata Motors Ltd.Tata said Monday it has closed on the deal first announced on March 26. Tata is paying about $2.3 billion (euro1.5 billion) for the British brands, but Ford is paying about $600 million (euro387 million) into the Jaguar-Land Rover pension fund.The sale had been in the works for months as cash-strapped Ford sought money to fund its turnaroun ..The sale nets the Dearborn, Michigan-based automaker $1.7 billion (euro1.1 billion) _ roughly a third of the price it paid for the two luxury brands.Ford bought Jaguar for $2.5 billion in 1989 and Land Rover for $2.7 billion in 2000.
article
Sell
Sell
F
Ford Motor
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Market Is Punishing Negative EPS Surprises More Than Average for Q2(Aug 12, 2024)
article
Neutral
Neutral
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Market Is Punishing Negative EPS Surprises More Than Average for Q2(Aug 12, 2024)
To date, 91% of the companies in the S&P 500 have reported earnings for the second quarter. Of these companies, 78% have reported actual EPS above the mean EPS estimate, which is above the 5-year average of 77% and above the 10-year average of 74%. In aggregate, earnings have exceeded estimates by 3.5%, which is below the 5-year average of 8.6% and below the 10-year average of 6.8%. Given this mixed performance relative to the averages, how has the market responded to EPS surprises reported by S&P 500 companies during the Q2 earnings season?To date, the market is rewarding positive earnings surprises reported by S&P 500 companies less than average and punishing negative earnings surprises reported by S&P 500 companies more than average.Companies that have reported positive earnings surprises for Q2 2024 have seen an average price increase of 0.8% two days before the earnings release through two days after the earnings release. This percentage increase is below the 5-year average price increase of 1.0% during this same window for companies reporting positive earnings surprises.One example of a company that reported a positive EPS surprise in Q2 and witnessed a decline in stock price is Amazon.com. On August 1, the company reported actual (GAAP) EPS of $1.26 for Q2, which was above the mean (GAAP) EPS estimate of $1.03. However, from July 30 to August 5, the stock price for Amazon.com decreased by 11.4% (to $161.02 from $181.71).Companies that have reported negative earnings surprises for Q2 2024 have seen an average price decrease of 3.8% two days before the earnings release through two days after the earnings release. This percentage decrease is larger than the 5-year average price decrease of 2.3% during this same window for companies reporting negative earnings surprises.One example of a company that reported a negative EPS surprise in Q2 and witnessed a significant decline in stock price is Ford Motor. On July 24, the company reported actual (non-GAAP) EPS of $0.47 for Q2, which was below the mean (non-GAAP) EPS estimate of $0.64. From July 22 to July 26, the stock price for Ford Motor decreased by 20.8% (to $11.19 from $14.12).What is driving the market’s below-average reaction to both positive and negative EPS surprises for Q2? It is likely not due to earnings guidance from companies or estimate revisions by analysts for the third quarter.In terms of EPS guidance, the percentage of S&P 500 companies issuing negative EPS guidance for Q3 is below average. At this point in time, 86 companies in the index have issued EPS guidance for Q3 2024. Of these 86 companies, 47 have issued negative EPS guidance and 39 have issued positive EPS guidance. The percentage of companies issuing negative EPS guidance for Q3 2024 is 55% (47 out of 86), which is below the 5-year average of 59% and below the 10-year average of 63%.In terms of revisions to EPS estimates for S&P 500 companies, analysts lowered EPS estimates for Q3 2024 at average levels during the month of July. The Q3 bottom-up EPS estimate (which is an aggregation of the median EPS estimates for Q3 for all the companies in the index) decreased by 1.8% (to $62.08 from $63.20) from June 30 to July 31. This decline was equal to the 5-year average, the 10-year average, and the 20-year average for the first month of a quarter. For more details, please see this article: Are Analysts Cutting EPS Estimates More Than Average for S&P 500 Companies for Q3? 
article
Neutral
Neutral
Economy & Strategy
user
박재훈투영인
·
5 months ago
0
0
Mounting Fears Shake World Markets As Banking Giants Rush to Raise Capital(Sept. 18, 2008)
article
Strong Sell
Strong Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
user
박재훈투영인
·
5 months ago
0
0
Mounting Fears Shake World Markets As Banking Giants Rush to Raise Capital(Sept. 18, 2008)
Fear coursed through the U.S. financial system on Wednesday, as hope for a resolution to the year-old credit crisis faded.Stocks tumbled, concern grew about which financial firm would fall next, and investors rushed toward the safe haven of government bonds in the wake of the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and the crisis at insurer American International Group.The market turmoil is doing more than inflicting losses on investors. Borrowing costs for U.S. companies have skyrocketed, and the debt markets have become nearly inaccessible to all but the most creditworthy borrowers.The desperation was especially striking in the market for U.S. government debt, long considered the safest of investments. At one point during the day, investors were willing to pay more for one-month Treasurys than they could expect to get back when the bonds matured. Some investors, in essence, had decided that a small but known loss was better than the uncertainty connected to any other type of investment.That's never happened before. In a special government auction on Wednesday, demand ran so high that the Treasury Department sold $40 billion in bills, far beyond what it needed to cover the government's obligations."We've seen crisis. We've seen recession. But we've not seen the core of the financial system shaken like this," says Joseph Balestrino, a portfolio manager at Federated Investors. "It's just crazy."A 449-point selloff took the Dow Jones Industrial Average to its lowest level in almost three years, leaving it 23% below where it stood a year ago. Volume on the New York Stock Exchange was the second highest in history, falling just shy of the record set on Tuesday. The VIX, a widely watched measure of market volatility that is often referred to as the "fear index," hit its highest level since late 2002.In Europe, stock markets lost roughly 2% of their value. In Russia, the scene of recent massive declines, trading on the country's major exchanges was halted for the second day in a row, this time only an hour and a half into the session. Gold prices rose 9% to $846.60 an ounce amid the global turmoil. In early trading Thursday, Tokyo stocks were down 3.2%, among other declining markets in the region."Forget about retail investors, all the pros are scared," says one broker. "People have no idea where to put their money."For now, "if you have cash, you're going to put it in the short-term, most liquid stuff you can," says Steve Van Order, fixed-income strategist for Calvert Asset Management.Adding to the fear was a loss in a prominent money-market fund, the Reserve Primary Fund, which held Lehman Brothers debt. It was the first time since 1994 that such a fund, which is supposed to be as safe as a bank account, had lost money. The loss was made worse by a run on the fund. Over two days, investors pulled more than half of their assets from the fund, once valued at $64 billion."This is a panic situation" in the bond markets, says Charles Comiskey, head of U.S. government-bond trading in New York at HSBC Securities USA Inc.Riskier assets were sold off. Yields on bonds issued by financial companies hit a record high of about six percentage points above U.S. Treasurys. In the market for credit-default swaps -- essentially insurance against default on assets tied to corporate debt and mortgage securities -- fears increased on Wednesday about whether counterparties would be able to honor their agreements. Investors tried to reduce their exposures to two more big players in the market, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley. That sent the cost of protection on both Wall Street firms soaring to new highs.In the stock market, the pressure on financial firms continued, with Morgan Stanley stock dropping 24% and Goldman Sachs shares losing 14%.Investors say the government takeover of AIG and Lehman's bankruptcy filing are evidence that the situation is grimmer than all but the most pessimistic had expected. Problems have spread from complex debt markets tied directly to the housing market into plain-vanilla corporate bonds."Another front is opening," says Ajay Rajadhyaksha, head of fixed-income research at Barclays Capital.Some people fear that the dwindling ranks of investment banks, coming at a time when commercial banks are pulling back on their own use of capital, will prolong the credit crunch."It's unclear who is going to be a credit provider going forward, and if having fewer credit providers means higher costs of borrowing going forward," says Basil Williams, chief executive of hedge-fund manager Concordia Advisors.Ordinarily, bondholders are better protected from losses than stock investors. But the events of the past two weeks have shown that they are vulnerable, too. The Federal Reserve's rescue of AIG doesn't protect the company's bondholders. That's because the deal, which consists of a high-priced loan to the company from the government, requires AIG to pay the Treasury before current bondholders. If AIG can't raise enough cash by selling assets, bondholders won't be fully repaid.As a result, despite the Fed lifeline, some AIG debt is changing hands at just 40 cents on the dollar, less than half of the price one week ago. Now that Lehman has defaulted on its debt, its senior bonds are worth as little as 17 cents on the dollar, traders say.That's spilled over to other financial names seen as under stress. Bonds of Morgan Stanley are trading at around 60 cents on the dollar. Goldman Sachs's bonds are trading at prices in the range of 70 cents on the dollar.As bond prices dropped, their yields rose. The spread between yields on corporate bonds and safe U.S. Treasurys have blown out to the widest levels traders have seen in years. On Wednesday, yields on investment-grade corporate bonds were more than four percentage points higher than comparable Treasury bonds, according to Merrill Lynch. Junk bonds ended the day more than nine percentage points over Treasurys, approaching the 2002 high of 10.6 percentage points, according to Merrill.Short-term debt markets, where companies borrow overnight or in periods up to one year, have dried up. The money-market-fund managers who normally buy such short-term debt have suffered losses on their holdings of debt in Lehman Brothers and other financial institutions.If companies can't borrow in the short-term debt markets, they may be forced to draw down on their revolving credit lines, yet another drain on banks' dwindling capital.The Lehman bankruptcy also pressured the market for leveraged loans, which are used by private-equity firms to finance buyouts. When the firm attempted to sell some of its loan holdings earlier this week, prices dropped toward 85 cents on the dollar, according to Standard & Poor's Leveraged Commentary & Data.The damage has gone beyond banks and brokerages. Ford Motor Credit Co., the finance arm of Ford Motor Co., paid 7.5% for Tuesday-night overnight borrowings, says one trader. Typically, the rate for such debt would be about one-quarter percentage point over the federal-funds rate, which is currently 2%, he says. Even for companies considered of the safest credit quality, the cost of overnight debt is rising. General Electric Co. was forced to pay 3.5% for overnight borrowing on Wednesday, the trader says. In normal times, GE, which has the highest debt rating, would have to pay the equivalent of the federal-funds rate."There's no evident catalyst for ending the pain," says Guy Lebas, chief fixed-income strategist at Janney Montgomery in Philadelphia.
article
Strong Sell
Strong Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF