logo

HomeArticlesServicePriceAbout

EN

Menu

Home
Articles
Search
About
EN
logo
Price
logo

Company

AboutTerms of Service Privacy Policy

Social

LinkedIn Twitter Discord

Contact

contact@coresixteen.com coresixteen.com
Company NameCORE16 Inc.
CEODavid Cho
Business Registration Number762-81-03235
Address83, Uisadang-daero, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07325, Republic of KOREA
Williams
Search Result
Economy & Strategy
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Measuring the Neutral Interest Rate Is a Complex Process (Mar 8, 2023)
article
Neutral
Neutral
NONE
No Relevant Stock
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Measuring the Neutral Interest Rate Is a Complex Process (Mar 8, 2023)
What Is R-Star (r)?*R-star (r*, the real neutral rate of interest) is a theoretical rate that allows an economy to grow at its potential without causing inflationary or deflationary pressures.It represents a "neutral" level where monetary policy neither stimulates nor restricts economic activity.R-star is a real interest rate, meaning it accounts for expected inflation.Why R-Star MattersMonetary Policy Benchmark: If the policy rate is above r*, monetary policy is restrictive; if it is below r*, it is expansionary.Long-term Guidance: Central banks use r* to gauge where interest rates should stabilize in the future.Asset Valuation: R-star influences discount rates used in financial models, affecting corporate valuations and asset prices.Challenges in Measuring R-StarUnobservable Variable:R-star is a theoretical construct and cannot be directly observed.It must be estimated using economic models, which yield different results based on assumptions.Structural Economic Changes:Technological progress, demographic shifts, and globalization impact r*, making its estimation highly uncertain.Data Limitations:Economic data reflects past conditions, making forward-looking estimates difficult.Different Models for Estimating R-StarHLW Model (Holston-Laubach-Williams):Uses inflation and unemployment trends to estimate r*.Becomes unreliable when Phillips Curve relationships weaken.UMod Model:Enhances HLW by incorporating labor market variables.Still constrained by data limitations and model complexity.Simplified Approaches:Directly estimate output gaps.Reduce complexity but rely heavily on subjective judgment.Policy ImplicationsOver-reliance on r estimates can misguide policy decisions.*Central banks should use r as a flexible reference rather than an absolute target.*Considering multiple indicators (inflation expectations, labor market conditions, financial stability risks) is crucial for effective policy.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
NONE
No Relevant Stock
user
박재훈투영인
·
5 months ago
0
0
Economists React: China's GDP Shows Signs of Overheating(April 15, 2010)
article
Sell
Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
+2
user
박재훈투영인
·
5 months ago
0
0
Economists React: China's GDP Shows Signs of Overheating(April 15, 2010)
China's latest economic data show an attention-getting 11.9% surge in the first quarter's gross domestic product, combined with moderate inflation and slowing investment spending. Although China's leadership is clearly worried about a real-estate bubble, their next step is not obvious. Economists highlight what the mixed signals might mean for the future:Growth is strong, but there are signs of overheating. With stimulus already partly removed, the key is whether the authorities can steer the economy onto a more sustainable growth path, or whether generalized inflation and/or an asset bubble will break out in the second half and then trigger a bigger policy-induced slowdown for China in 2011. - Stephen Green, Standard CharteredWith 11.9% year-on-year GDP growth surpassing potential growth, overheated demand not only exhausts spare resources but also overstretches the supply capacity of raw materials, energy and infrastructure, leading to rapid upward pressure on prices. This is likely to be exacerbated by the fast export recovery, given that warming global demand puts new orders to China's manufacturers which exhausts the spare manufacturing capacity and ultimately adds pressures on consumer goods. ... In sum, the latest data releases have pointed to rising overheating and inflation risks. -- Qu Hongbin, HSBCThe acceleration in growth argues for further policy tightening. Yet, the call is not straightforward. CPI inflation is currently lower relative to the last two tightening periods in 2004 and 2007. The government is also concerned about producing a 2008-style correction in the property market. ... The fact that residential investment is the major driver of growth remains a concern. Residential apartments are a more politically sensitive issue than, for instance, steel factories, meaning the government may be reluctant to tighten as aggressively as it has in the past towards other sectors. - Ben Simpfendorfer, Royal Bank of ScotlandCPI inflation remains muted, at least for now. However, after four quarters of consecutive above-potential-level of GDP growth we believe the output gap is closed. We think in absence of a dramatic fall in external demand, it is critical for the government to tighten policy more decisively than they have been doing in order to prevent overheating. However, as CPI inflation remains low for now and policymakers remain very cautious on the external demand outlook we are likely to see more decisive tightening measures after CPI inflation rises to a relatively high level of say 3%-4%. - Yu Song & Helen Qiao, Goldman SachsWith growth now strong but headline inflation still subdued, the government has a window of opportunity to reign in the policy stimulus before it tips over into excess. ... On interest rates, the government is faced with an unpalatable choice: raise rates and damp the ardor of investors in the real estate sector, or leave rates on hold and allow the property bubble to expand further, and risk inflationary expectations taking hold. - Tom Orlik, Stone & McCarthy Research AssociatesFor now, the print of data does change the economic policy debate. There has been growing speculation that China may move on interest rates in response to the stronger property data (both volume and price) in April. We believe that the better than expected price data in March will be sufficient to keep the PBoC sidelined until the second half of the year. ... China's exit strategy continues to be one of subtlety and restraint. - Glenn Maguire, Societe GeneraleThe acceleration in year-on-year growth in Q1 was entirely due to weakness a year ago. Growth has continued to slow in quarter-on-quarter terms and the economy is now expanding at an unremarkable pace. Price pressures too seem to be easing. While we expect policy tightening over the coming quarter, there is no need for dramatic measures. - Mark Williams, Capital Economics
article
Sell
Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
+2
user
박재훈투영인
·
5 months ago
0
0
Mounting Fears Shake World Markets As Banking Giants Rush to Raise Capital(Sept. 18, 2008)
article
Strong Sell
Strong Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
user
박재훈투영인
·
5 months ago
0
0
Mounting Fears Shake World Markets As Banking Giants Rush to Raise Capital(Sept. 18, 2008)
Fear coursed through the U.S. financial system on Wednesday, as hope for a resolution to the year-old credit crisis faded.Stocks tumbled, concern grew about which financial firm would fall next, and investors rushed toward the safe haven of government bonds in the wake of the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and the crisis at insurer American International Group.The market turmoil is doing more than inflicting losses on investors. Borrowing costs for U.S. companies have skyrocketed, and the debt markets have become nearly inaccessible to all but the most creditworthy borrowers.The desperation was especially striking in the market for U.S. government debt, long considered the safest of investments. At one point during the day, investors were willing to pay more for one-month Treasurys than they could expect to get back when the bonds matured. Some investors, in essence, had decided that a small but known loss was better than the uncertainty connected to any other type of investment.That's never happened before. In a special government auction on Wednesday, demand ran so high that the Treasury Department sold $40 billion in bills, far beyond what it needed to cover the government's obligations."We've seen crisis. We've seen recession. But we've not seen the core of the financial system shaken like this," says Joseph Balestrino, a portfolio manager at Federated Investors. "It's just crazy."A 449-point selloff took the Dow Jones Industrial Average to its lowest level in almost three years, leaving it 23% below where it stood a year ago. Volume on the New York Stock Exchange was the second highest in history, falling just shy of the record set on Tuesday. The VIX, a widely watched measure of market volatility that is often referred to as the "fear index," hit its highest level since late 2002.In Europe, stock markets lost roughly 2% of their value. In Russia, the scene of recent massive declines, trading on the country's major exchanges was halted for the second day in a row, this time only an hour and a half into the session. Gold prices rose 9% to $846.60 an ounce amid the global turmoil. In early trading Thursday, Tokyo stocks were down 3.2%, among other declining markets in the region."Forget about retail investors, all the pros are scared," says one broker. "People have no idea where to put their money."For now, "if you have cash, you're going to put it in the short-term, most liquid stuff you can," says Steve Van Order, fixed-income strategist for Calvert Asset Management.Adding to the fear was a loss in a prominent money-market fund, the Reserve Primary Fund, which held Lehman Brothers debt. It was the first time since 1994 that such a fund, which is supposed to be as safe as a bank account, had lost money. The loss was made worse by a run on the fund. Over two days, investors pulled more than half of their assets from the fund, once valued at $64 billion."This is a panic situation" in the bond markets, says Charles Comiskey, head of U.S. government-bond trading in New York at HSBC Securities USA Inc.Riskier assets were sold off. Yields on bonds issued by financial companies hit a record high of about six percentage points above U.S. Treasurys. In the market for credit-default swaps -- essentially insurance against default on assets tied to corporate debt and mortgage securities -- fears increased on Wednesday about whether counterparties would be able to honor their agreements. Investors tried to reduce their exposures to two more big players in the market, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley. That sent the cost of protection on both Wall Street firms soaring to new highs.In the stock market, the pressure on financial firms continued, with Morgan Stanley stock dropping 24% and Goldman Sachs shares losing 14%.Investors say the government takeover of AIG and Lehman's bankruptcy filing are evidence that the situation is grimmer than all but the most pessimistic had expected. Problems have spread from complex debt markets tied directly to the housing market into plain-vanilla corporate bonds."Another front is opening," says Ajay Rajadhyaksha, head of fixed-income research at Barclays Capital.Some people fear that the dwindling ranks of investment banks, coming at a time when commercial banks are pulling back on their own use of capital, will prolong the credit crunch."It's unclear who is going to be a credit provider going forward, and if having fewer credit providers means higher costs of borrowing going forward," says Basil Williams, chief executive of hedge-fund manager Concordia Advisors.Ordinarily, bondholders are better protected from losses than stock investors. But the events of the past two weeks have shown that they are vulnerable, too. The Federal Reserve's rescue of AIG doesn't protect the company's bondholders. That's because the deal, which consists of a high-priced loan to the company from the government, requires AIG to pay the Treasury before current bondholders. If AIG can't raise enough cash by selling assets, bondholders won't be fully repaid.As a result, despite the Fed lifeline, some AIG debt is changing hands at just 40 cents on the dollar, less than half of the price one week ago. Now that Lehman has defaulted on its debt, its senior bonds are worth as little as 17 cents on the dollar, traders say.That's spilled over to other financial names seen as under stress. Bonds of Morgan Stanley are trading at around 60 cents on the dollar. Goldman Sachs's bonds are trading at prices in the range of 70 cents on the dollar.As bond prices dropped, their yields rose. The spread between yields on corporate bonds and safe U.S. Treasurys have blown out to the widest levels traders have seen in years. On Wednesday, yields on investment-grade corporate bonds were more than four percentage points higher than comparable Treasury bonds, according to Merrill Lynch. Junk bonds ended the day more than nine percentage points over Treasurys, approaching the 2002 high of 10.6 percentage points, according to Merrill.Short-term debt markets, where companies borrow overnight or in periods up to one year, have dried up. The money-market-fund managers who normally buy such short-term debt have suffered losses on their holdings of debt in Lehman Brothers and other financial institutions.If companies can't borrow in the short-term debt markets, they may be forced to draw down on their revolving credit lines, yet another drain on banks' dwindling capital.The Lehman bankruptcy also pressured the market for leveraged loans, which are used by private-equity firms to finance buyouts. When the firm attempted to sell some of its loan holdings earlier this week, prices dropped toward 85 cents on the dollar, according to Standard & Poor's Leveraged Commentary & Data.The damage has gone beyond banks and brokerages. Ford Motor Credit Co., the finance arm of Ford Motor Co., paid 7.5% for Tuesday-night overnight borrowings, says one trader. Typically, the rate for such debt would be about one-quarter percentage point over the federal-funds rate, which is currently 2%, he says. Even for companies considered of the safest credit quality, the cost of overnight debt is rising. General Electric Co. was forced to pay 3.5% for overnight borrowing on Wednesday, the trader says. In normal times, GE, which has the highest debt rating, would have to pay the equivalent of the federal-funds rate."There's no evident catalyst for ending the pain," says Guy Lebas, chief fixed-income strategist at Janney Montgomery in Philadelphia.
article
Strong Sell
Strong Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF