logo

HomeArticlesServicePriceAbout

EN

Menu

Home
Articles
Service
Price
Search
About
EN
logo
logo

Company

AboutTerms of Service Privacy Policy

Social

LinkedIn Twitter Discord

Contact

contact@coresixteen.com coresixteen.com
Company NameCORE16 Inc.
CEODavid Cho
Business Registration Number762-81-03235
officePhone070-4225-0201
Address83, Uisadang-daero, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07325, Republic of KOREA
Wells Fargo
Search Result
Firm
user
박재훈투영인
·
7 months ago
0
0
Nasdaq reaches new record high, 15 years after dotcom tech surge(Apr.23.2015)
article
Sell
Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
user
박재훈투영인
·
7 months ago
0
0
Nasdaq reaches new record high, 15 years after dotcom tech surge(Apr.23.2015)
The Nasdaq index reached a record high on Thursday, topping a record set 15 years ago during the height of the dotcom tech bubble.The index had risen as much as 25 points, or 0.5%, to 5,060.14 by early afternoon, topping its all-time closing high of 5,048.62 on March 10, 2000. It ended the day at 5,056.06, up 0.41%.The Dow Jones and S&P have recorded dozens of new highs since the end of the recession. While the Nasdaq has come close to topping its former levels until Thursday, it had always fallen short.The index was the world’s first electronic stock exchange and has become the traditional home of many of tech’s biggest companies. Amazon, Apple, Cisco, Facebook, Google, Intel and Microsoft are all traded on the Nasdaq.But in recent years it has diversified its portfolio of companies, and now includes high-flying biotech stocks including Amgen and Gilead Sciences. The shift may have broadened Nasdaq’s appeal, but it is still heavily weighted to the fortunes of the tech sector. Apple, the world’s most valuable company, is Nasdaq’s largest component, and its record-breaking share price run has helped propel Nasdaq’s rise.It has taken Nasdaq 15-years to recover from the last big technology crash. On March 10, 2000, the Nasdaq Composite index closed at a record of 5,048.62, up 24% since the beginning of the year, and capping an amazing decade in which it skyrocketed over 1,300%.Then the dotcom bubble burst. Nasdaq lost half its value in 2001 and reached an all-time low of 1,108.49 in October 2002.This time, it’s different. At least according to some. Brian Jacobsen, chief portfolio strategist at Wells Fargo, predicted last month that the Nasdaq would soon reach 6,000. “Valuations are just very reasonable,” he told CNBC. “I think the big thing that is going to drive the market higher is people buying into the idea that the market isn’t going to fall out from underneath them.”Others are less sure. Stephen Massocca, chief investment officer at Wedbush Equity Management, said the rise was being underpinned by monetary policy rather than fundamental value of the companies in the index. “Ultimately what’s driving this is low interest rates and easy money,” he said.Investors have also bid up social media companies to “1999-2000 level”, he said. Massocca said social media stocks were the “Inner Station” – home to the crazed ivory trader Mr Kurtz in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness – at the centre of the story of Nasdaq’s new rise.“I don’t know when it’s going to end but I know how,” said Massocca. He said that when investors start to believe the end is coming for the easy monetary policies in the US, Europe and Japan then there would be a “swift and violent” reaction in the stock markets.Worries about a tech bubble have been growing as a new generation of tech companies have attracted sky high valuations. Uber, the taxi app comp[any, is now valued at $41bn, Snapchat, the ephemeral messaging service, is valued at $15bn.Many industry leaders have raised concerns about a new asset bubble. Last month billionaire Mark Cuban, who made a fortune in the last tech boom, warned against the current appetite for tech.“If we thought it was stupid to invest in public internet websites that had no chance of succeeding back then, it’s worse today,” he wrote in a blogpost.
article
Sell
Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
Economy & Strategy
user
셀스마트 앤지
·
6 months ago
1
0
What is Warren Buffett's "Sell Smart"?
article
Neutral
Neutral
AAPL
Apple
user
셀스마트 앤지
·
6 months ago
1
0
What is Warren Buffett's "Sell Smart"?
Warren Buffett, one of the most respected and legendary investors in the world, is widely known as a “value investor.” However, he is actually a “growth investor.” This is because Buffett does not sell simply based on a high Price-to-Earnings Ratio (PER).Traditionally, value investors make buy and sell decisions based on valuation metrics such as PER and Price-to-Book Ratio (PBR), aiming to buy at low prices and sell at high prices. In contrast, growth investors focus less on multiples and more on Earnings Per Share (EPS) trends, specifically whether a company can sustain its profit growth over time.Buffett’s Core Investment StrategyInvesting in companies with strong brands and sustainable competitive advantages – Coca-Cola, American Express, and Apple all have high customer loyalty and global market dominance.Long-term holding strategy – Most of Buffett’s top-performing stocks have been held for decades, maximizing the power of compounding returns.Preference for companies with strong pricing power – Buffett favors companies like Moody’s and Apple, where raising prices does not significantly impact customer demand.Adapting to change while maintaining principles – He sold stakes in some banks (Wells Fargo, U.S. Bancorp) but continued to hold Bank of America due to confidence in its CEO.His core investment strategy reflects that he makes investment decisions based on long-term revenue growth and the key attributes necessary for EPS growth.Key Takeaway from Buffett’s Sell Smart ApproachMaking sell decisions solely based on stock price fluctuations or valuation multiples may not be sufficient for successful investing. The lesson from Buffett’s Sell Smart strategy is that a deep understanding of a company’s core competitive advantages and the ability to recognize fundamental changes are essential for a successful investment journey.Apple’s Stock Price Trend & Buffett’s Major Sell Decisions1) Large-scale selling during EPS growth stagnation (First bought in 2016, major selling in early 2024)2) No position reduction despite high PER (No selling in 2020 and 2021, despite high valuation)Source: QuantiWise, Forbes, Core16
article
Neutral
Neutral
AAPL
Apple
user
박재훈투영인
·
7 months ago
0
0
Morgan Stanley in Talks With Wachovia, Others(Sept. 18, 2008)
article
Strong Sell
Strong Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
user
박재훈투영인
·
7 months ago
0
0
Morgan Stanley in Talks With Wachovia, Others(Sept. 18, 2008)
Morgan Stanley sought shelter from the growing financial storm Wednesday, entering preliminary merger talks with Wachovia Corp. and other banks as a seventh straight decline in the company's share price sent the stock to its lowest level since 1998.After a harrowing day, Morgan Stanley's shares finished down $6.95, or 24%, to $21.75. Goldman Sachs Group, the largest U.S. investment bank by market value, also fell $18.51, or 14%, to $114.50.While the situation is more acute at Morgan Stanley, the two Wall Street banks are both battling extraordinary market pressures that have already pushed stable franchises such as Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Merrill Lynch & Co. into bankruptcy protection or hasty merger deals. At Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, two of the oldest and most successful investment banks, market confidence withered in the past 24 hours for firms that were once trusted and envied.As employees stared at their trading screens and television sets, a sense of disbelief hung over people who had thought themselves largely insulated from credit-market fears. "I've lost more than half my net worth in a month," said one Goldman employee.The perception hurting investment-bank shares is that they can no longer rely on jittery global markets to replenish the cash necessary to fund their trading and lending businesses. That has forced the companies' borrowing costs higher, which means, ultimately, it will likely become prohibitively expensive for them to fund their businesses.Commercial banks such as Wachovia are perceived as more stable, creating strong incentive for investment banks to link up with them, as Merrill Lynch did earlier this week with Bank of America Corp. But even some retail banks are under attack, such as the large savings-and-loan Washington Mutual Inc., which was exploring its own deal Wednesday with several other banks. WaMu has received expressions of interest from Wells Fargo & Co., Citigroup Inc. and other large banks, including one based outside the U.S., according to people familiar with the situation.Inside Morgan Stanley there was a growing feeling that the firm's chief executive, John Mack, would have to explore a merger or outside investment. Just 10 days ago Mr. Mack said in a Fortune magazine interview that he was "not thinking about selling the firm."But markets have moved with such force that yesterday Mr. Mack fielded a call from Wachovia CEO Robert Steel about a potential tie-up. Messrs. Mack and Steel both attended Duke University and have been on its board of trustees for more than a decade. Mr. Mack grew up in Mooresville, N.C., about 30 miles from Charlotte, N.C., where Wachovia is based.A spokeswoman for Morgan Stanley said that the firm is "focused on solutions" to address the falling stock price. Wachovia declined to comment.As much as Morgan Stanley is suffering, Wachovia faces its own uncertain future. Saddled with a mountain of troubled adjustable-rate mortgages inherited through its 2006 takeover of Golden West Financial Corp., Wachovia has seen its financial condition weaken and its stock price plunge. After the disastrous Golden West acquisition, few Wachovia shareholders are likely to relish the idea of another huge deal, particularly one with another battered financial institution.Morgan Stanley is also exploring preliminary tie-ups with a range of other banks around the globe, say people familiar with the matter. Morgan Stanley may well remain independent, but if a deal were struck it could come with the likes of HSBC Holdings PLC of the U.K., Banco Santander SA of Spain, Japan's Nomura Holdings Inc., a Chinese financial institution or a domestic partner such as Bank of New York Mellon Corp., say the people familiar with the matter.Mr. Mack also took another tack Wednesday. He dialed U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox, as well as Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, to discuss how to stop the rapid decline in the two firms' share price. The two firms didn't discuss a merger but focused instead on how to stop short sellers betting on a decline in Goldman and Morgan shares, people familiar with the matter said.Mr. Mack entertained the idea of a lockup with Merrill Lynch last weekend as banking executives met at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to discuss the future of Lehman Brothers, but Merrill wanted to move too quickly for Mr. Mack, according to people familiar with the matter.Goldman Sachs has publicly toed a much more independent line in recent weeks. Its share price hasn't fallen as much as Morgan Stanley's, but its latest quarterly earnings report was its worst since 2005. The company says it has managed risk better than many commercial banks. Goldman officials add that commercial banks use the same funding markets as Goldman and Morgan Stanley do for large parts of their businesses.Mr. Mack and his fellow executives had hoped that their stock price would react better to the company's earnings announcement this week. The company's profits and net revenue topped even Goldman Sachs, which has avoided the blowups suffered by many peers.But after the earnings announcement late Tuesday afternoon caused initial enthusiasm among investors, Morgan Stanley shares resumed their downward march Wednesday. They continued lower even after the SEC announced that new restrictions would be placed on investors who bet on declines in share prices.
article
Strong Sell
Strong Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF