logo

HomeArticlesServicePriceAbout

EN

Menu

Home
Articles
Search
About
EN
logo
Price
logo

Company

AboutTerms of Service Privacy Policy

Social

LinkedIn Twitter Discord

Contact

contact@coresixteen.com coresixteen.com
Company NameCORE16 Inc.
CEODavid Cho
Business Registration Number762-81-03235
Address83, Uisadang-daero, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07325, Republic of KOREA
QUALCOMM
Search Result
Firm
user
셀스마트 대니
·
3 months ago
3
0
Is Your Stock at Risk? Top 10 U.S. Companies Most Exposed to the China Slowdown (Apr 13, 2025)
article
Strong Sell
Strong Sell
NVDA
NVIDIA
+9
user
셀스마트 대니
·
3 months ago
3
0
Is Your Stock at Risk? Top 10 U.S. Companies Most Exposed to the China Slowdown (Apr 13, 2025)
As U.S.–China trade tensions escalate, a select group of U.S.-listed companies with significant revenue exposure to China may be facing heightened earnings risk.According to Goldman Sachs and CarbonFinance, these companies span various industries, yet share a common vulnerability: China accounts for a substantial portion of their total sales.Las Vegas Sands (LVS, 63%) and Wynn Resorts (WYNN, 47%) generate a majority of revenue from Macau-based casino operations, effectively tying performance to the Chinese consumer economy.Qualcomm (QCOM, 62%) and Intel (INTC, 40%) rely heavily on Chinese handset and electronics clients for chip sales.Even Nvidia (NVDA, 39%), despite its AI and datacenter-driven growth, remains exposed to export risks should high-performance chip restrictions broaden.Other notable names include:KLA Corp (KLAC, 51%) – semiconductor inspection toolsCorning (GLW, 39%) – display glassBroadcom (AVGO, 32%) – networking chipsAptiv (APTV, 28%) – auto electronics & wiringTeradyne (TER, 26%) – semiconductor test equipmentIf tariffs increase or export controls are expanded, these companies could see near-term volatility in earnings, paired with declining investor sentiment tied to geopolitical uncertainty.Source: https://t.me/insidertracking/8975[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Strong Sell
Strong Sell
NVDA
NVIDIA
+9
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Where Is Lee Jae-yong's Leadership? The Reality of Samsung’s Crisis (Oct 22, 2024)
article
Sell
Sell
005930
Samsung Electronics
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Where Is Lee Jae-yong's Leadership? The Reality of Samsung’s Crisis (Oct 22, 2024)
Concerns over Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Jae-yong's leadership are growing both domestically and internationally. Critics argue that Samsung has failed to respond proactively in the semiconductor industry, while also facing internal inefficiencies that require urgent restructuring.Leadership Under ScrutinyLee Jae-yong marks his 2nd anniversary as chairman on October 27, but Samsung has no official plans for a statement.The company also approaches its 55th anniversary (Nov 1) and 50 years in semiconductors (Dec 6), raising speculation about future strategic directions.Despite his public appearances—such as the fourth anniversary of Samsung’s pediatric cancer support program on Oct 21—Lee has remained silent on the company's ongoing challenges.Samsung’s Mounting Crisis1. Semiconductor SetbacksFalling Behind in Foundry & Advanced Chips:TSMC dominates AI-driven demand, securing contracts with NVIDIA, Apple, AMD, and Qualcomm.Samsung’s foundry & system LSI division posted over ₩1 trillion in losses in Q3.In 2011, Samsung’s non-memory sales were 88% of TSMC’s; by 2023, this shrank to just 25%.Despite ₩15 trillion annual investments, the gap is widening.Taiwan’s Digitimes (Oct 15) stated that Samsung’s price competition strategy failed due to poor yield rates.HBM Missteps:SK Hynix leads the HBM market, securing early dominance in AI-driven memory.Samsung disbanded its HBM R&D team in 2019, now struggling to catch up.2. Stock Performance & Investor SentimentStock Price:October 21 closing price: ₩59,000 (-0.34%).Hit 52-week low amid continued foreign selling.Foreign investors dumped ₩12.6 trillion worth of Samsung shares over two months.Investor Confidence Eroding:Morgan Stanley's “Winter Looms” report forecasts a semiconductor downturn due to DRAM oversupply and HBM price declines.Macquarie downgraded Samsung to "Neutral" from "Buy".3. Inefficient Decision-Making StructureExcessive Influence of Samsung’s Business Support TF (Task Force):Led by Vice Chairman Chung Hyun-ho, this unit is criticized for slow, risk-averse decision-making.Compared to Intel’s past missteps, where middle management bottlenecks delayed crucial technology transitions.Internal Criticism & Employee Frustration:Employee forum discussions describe a rigid, top-heavy reporting structure stifling innovation and accountability.4. Lack of Bold Strategic MovesLeadership & Talent Strategy Issues:May 2024 appointment of new semiconductor chief Jeon Young-hyun was seen as too conservative.No major acquisitions or aggressive R&D initiatives have been pursued.Samsung’s Crisis = Korea’s Crisis?Samsung accounted for 18% of Korea’s total exports in 2023 (₩150 trillion out of ₩830 trillion).KDI research (2017) showed that shocks to Korea’s top 3 corporations explain 59% of macroeconomic volatility—highlighting Samsung’s systemic importance.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Sell
Sell
005930
Samsung Electronics
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Why Is ‘₩50,000 Samsung’ Struggling While Global Semiconductor Stocks Soar? (Oct 11, 2024)
article
Sell
Sell
005930
Samsung Electronics
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Why Is ‘₩50,000 Samsung’ Struggling While Global Semiconductor Stocks Soar? (Oct 11, 2024)
Samsung Electronics' stock price has fallen below ₩60,000 for the first time in 17 months, despite the strong performance of U.S. semiconductor stocks. As South Korea’s largest market-cap stock struggles, the KOSPI index failed to break above 2,600, closing in the 2,500 range. Meanwhile, the U.S. stock market hit record highs, boosted by tech stock gains and falling oil prices.According to the Korea Exchange on October 10, Samsung Electronics closed at ₩58,900, down 2.32%, marking its lowest level since March 16, 2023 (₩59,900) and setting a new 52-week low. The ongoing impact of weak earnings has driven the stock down by over 11% in the past month. Analysts expect continued poor performance in Q4, leading to a wave of target price downgrades.Samsung’s decline also weighed on the broader market, limiting the KOSPI’s gains. While other semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix (+4.89%) and Hanmi Semiconductor (+3.07%) surged, the KOSPI managed only a 0.19% increase, closing at 2,599.16.The Korean stock market has remained sluggish since the global sell-off on August 5. According to the Bank of Korea’s latest international finance and foreign exchange report, foreign investors sold $5.57 billion worth of South Korean stocks in September, marking the largest outflow since May 2021 (-$8.23 billion). The sharp increase in stock outflows also turned South Korea’s overall securities investment (stocks + bonds) into net outflows for the first time since October 2023.U.S. Stocks Hit New Highs as Semiconductor Sector StrengthensIn contrast, the New York Stock Exchange set new record highs:Dow Jones: +1.03% to 42,512.00S&P 500: +0.71% to 5,792.04 (44th all-time high this year)Nasdaq: +0.60% to 18,291.62The semiconductor sector soared, fueled by TSMC’s stronger-than-expected September sales.ASML: +2.63%ARM: +3.36%Qualcomm: +2.33%Falling oil prices also boosted market sentiment. WTI crude oil for November delivery fell 0.45% to $73.24 per barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.Meanwhile, the release of the September U.S. Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting minutes introduced some uncertainty regarding future interest rate cuts, but the market largely shrugged it off. The minutes revealed that several Fed officials supported a ‘small cut’ (0.25 percentage points), contradicting earlier reports that only one official, Michelle Bowman, had backed a cut.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Sell
Sell
005930
Samsung Electronics
user
박재훈투영인
·
5 months ago
0
0
1999 Goes Into the Record Book on Wall Street(Jan. 1, 2000)
article
Sell
Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
user
박재훈투영인
·
5 months ago
0
0
1999 Goes Into the Record Book on Wall Street(Jan. 1, 2000)
Wall Street ended the millennium with an appropriate flourish on Friday, as major stock indexes closed at record highs amid signs that the feared Y2K bug was a no-show.But investors worldwide had basically been saying as much for months: The spectacular 1999 gains in equity markets from New York to Athens to Singapore were a strong vote not only for a smooth transition to the new millennium, but also for a booming global economy in the new year.Technology stocks, of course, were the driving force in the U.S. market in ’99. Ravenous demand by large and small investors alike for shares of semiconductor, software, Internet and telecommunications issues drove the Nasdaq composite index up 85.6% for the year, the greatest calendar-year advance of any major stock index in U.S. history.The previous record: The Dow Jones industrial average’s 81.7% surge in 1915.In a shortened trading session on Friday, while both the Nasdaq index and the Dow ended at new highs, the 28-year-old Nasdaq again showed the 103-year-old Dow who’s in charge now: Nasdaq jumped 32.44 points, or 0.8%, to 4,069.31, while the Dow rose half as much in percentage terms, adding 44.26 points to 11,497.12.Still, the blue-chip Dow’s 1999 advance of 25.2% beat the broader Standard & Poor’s 500 index’s gain of 19.5%, thanks in part to Dow Jones & Co.’s decision to take a page out of Nasdaq’s book and add tech giants Intel Corp. and Microsoft Corp. to the 30-stock index on Nov. 1.Microsoft has since zoomed 26%; Intel has risen 8%.Many smaller technology stocks also have been red-hot in recent months, a factor in pushing the Russell 2,000 small-stock index this week to its first series of record closes since April 1998.On Friday, the Russell jumped 1.6% to a new high of 504.75.Some traders said that suggested bargain-hunters were snapping up depressed smaller stocks, hoping for a “January effect” bounce--a surge in shares that had been beaten down at year-end by tax-related selling.But that kind of bargain-hunting would have to be dramatic to bring many U.S. stocks into the bull market that tech stocks have enjoyed over the last year in particular.Indeed, a question raised over and over on Wall Street in 1999 was: Whose bull market is this, anyway?On Nasdaq, for example, nearly half of that market’s 5,000-some stocks actually declined in price in 1999, even as the Nasdaq composite index zoomed.A major problem for many stocks, though obviously not the tech sector, was the ongoing rise in interest rates. The Federal Reserve raised short-term rates three times during the year (in June, August and November), citing concerns that the U.S. economy’s tremendous growth rate might boost inflationary pressures.That made for sheer misery in the bond market: Bond values plummeted as the yield on the bellwether 30-year Treasury bond soared, closing 1999 at 6.48%, highest since late 1997 and up from 5.09% at the end of 1998.On a total return basis--counting interest earned, then subtracting the net loss in principal value--the Vanguard Long-Term Treasury bond mutual fund lost 8.1% for the year.Who could blame investors who gave up on bonds altogether and joined the tech-stock stampede?Interest rates also rose across Europe and in parts of East Asia as the global economic recovery gained steam.Higher rates, as expected, wreaked havoc with traditionally interest rate-sensitive stock groups, including banks, insurance companies, home builders and utilities.The Dow Jones utility stock index slumped 9.3% for the year. The Nasdaq bank stock index slid 8%.Assuming the Y2K computer bug remains only an annoyance, at worst, to the world economy, many experts believe the Fed is poised to tighten credit further in 2000, probably as early as February.But would that matter to the roaring tech and telecom sectors, even with stock price-to-earnings ratios at levels never before seen in the modern market?Though many investors may have already forgotten, the tech sector last summer demonstrated just how much downside there can be in richly valued stocks.Many Internet-related stocks, after peaking last spring, fell 50% or more by early August, wiping out billions in market value and panicking many investors into selling--at exactly the wrong time, in many cases.The Net sector then turned on a dime and roared again in late summer and into autumn. For the year, the Interactive Week Internet stock index soared 168.3%.With the heated action in many tech issues worldwide over the last two months, analysts have run out of superlatives to describe the phenomenon.The cult stocks of the end of one millennium--and the beginning of another--include wireless technology titan Qualcomm in the United States, consumer electronics giant Sony Corp. in Japan, cellular phone leader Nokia in Finland and Internet content company China.com in Hong Kong.The market’s bulls say there’s a fundamental basis for these stocks’ gains: technology is the future, after all; and many of these companies unquestionably boast the best growth prospects of any businesses on Earth.The market’s bears say this is like any other investment mania in history, only worse. It can only end in a crash of stock values, they say--at least for the tech sector, and possibly for the broader market.If that happens, it will be brought to the world in living color on the largest video screen in the world: Nasdaq’s newly opened MarketSite Tower in the heart of New York’s Times Square.
article
Sell
Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
Economy & Strategy
user
박재훈투영인
·
3 months ago
0
0
Should We Sell Tech Stocks Exposed to Tariffs? (Apr 4, 2025)
article
Sell
Sell
AAPL
Apple
+9
user
박재훈투영인
·
3 months ago
0
0
Should We Sell Tech Stocks Exposed to Tariffs? (Apr 4, 2025)
Since President Trump's tariff announcement on April 2, tech stocks have struggled to find their footing. But some companies are clearly in deeper trouble than others.In particular, hardware-focused tech firms with globally distributed supply chains are scrambling to assess the impact. While some tariffs may eventually be reduced through negotiation, the worst-case scenario would see elevated import duties remain in place — potentially triggering retaliatory tariffs from other countries.Current tariff rates include:China: 54% (including pre-existing 20%)Vietnam: 46%India: 26%Taiwan: 32%Malaysia: 24%These countries are key manufacturing hubs for smartphone components, according to Morningstar equity analyst Phelix Lee.Gil Luria, Head of Tech Research at D.A. Davidson, said:“This is the most significant shift in economic outlook since the onset of COVID-19.”As investors assess how tariffs could impact valuations, risk tolerance is becoming a decisive factor. Those unable to stomach volatility or navigate prolonged uncertainty may shy away from hardware-heavy tech names.For those choosing to stay in the game, it’s worth closely watching companies exposed to imported hardware.According to J.P. Morgan's April 3 report, PCs are expected to face the largest price hikes, followed by servers and networking equipment.While the administration says chips will be excluded from the latest tariffs, many semiconductors are embedded in finished goods like PCs and servers — meaning indirect exposure is still significant.J.P. Morgan analysts noted that many tech companies had already begun adjusting supply chains and fine-tuning pricing models in anticipation of tariffs. However, the unexpectedly steep increases may force firms to accelerate reshoring efforts, which come at a high cost. Executives must now weigh whether these tariffs are a negotiation tactic or a long-term policy.Luria observed:“There was a lot of knee-jerk selling — you could see that in real time. But there’s also paralysis. If I like a company like Apple for the long term — if I believe people will continue buying iPhones and using more services — then I still want to own it. I don’t believe this is permanent.”Pinpointing the exact impact is difficult, as it depends on a company’s sourcing geography — and that information isn’t always disclosed to the market.J.P. Morgan estimates that, for hardware-centric firms, the blended effective tariff rate is around 30%, which could cut gross margins by 10% unless prices are raised.Company-Specific Estimates:Apple Inc.~80% of revenue from hardwareWould need to raise prices 6% globally to offset the impactDell Technologies Inc.75% hardware revenueWould require a 11% global price hike to maintain marginsCisco Systems Inc.34% hardware exposureEstimated 6% price increase neededSuper Micro Computer Inc.100% hardware revenueNeeds just 4% global price hike due to supply chain structureHewlett Packard Enterprise Co.62% hardware revenueEstimated 6% price increaseQualcomm Inc.Only 3% of hardware revenue affectedNo price increase requiredBig tech firms building out massive data centers — like Microsoft, Meta, Google, and Amazon — may also scale back capex as hardware costs surge.Luria noted:“These companies were building AI infrastructure far ahead of demand, made possible by strong core businesses and healthy cash flow. In a weaker economy, with declining demand for goods and services, they’ll likely pull back on those investments.”[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Sell
Sell
AAPL
Apple
+9