logo

HomeArticlesServicePriceAbout

EN

Menu

Home
Articles
Search
About
EN
logo
Price
logo

Company

AboutTerms of Service Privacy Policy

Social

LinkedIn Twitter Discord

Contact

contact@coresixteen.com coresixteen.com
Company NameCORE16 Inc.
CEODavid Cho
Business Registration Number762-81-03235
Address83, Uisadang-daero, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07325, Republic of KOREA
Netflix
Search Result
Firm
user
셀스마트 판다
·
3 days ago
0
0
K-Demon Hunters Goes Global — The Surprise Beneficiary? Nongshim
article
Neutral
Neutral
072710
Nongshim Holdings
user
셀스마트 판다
·
3 days ago
0
0
K-Demon Hunters Goes Global — The Surprise Beneficiary? Nongshim
There is a song trending on Spotify right nowThe OST tracks “Your Idol” and “Golden” from K-pop Demon Hunters are gaining serious attention.These songs ranked number 1 and 2 on Spotify’s US Daily Top Songs chartGolden entered the Billboard Hot 100 at number 23and the soundtrack album reached number 3 on the Billboard 200With this much buzz around the OST, it is natural for attention to turn to entertainment stocksBut the stock we are highlighting today is not HYBE or YGIt is the unexpected beneficiary—Nongshim HoldingsA global sensation that started with zero expectationsK-pop Demon Hunters, or KDHH, is an original animation produced by Sony Pictures. It follows the story of Huntress, a K-pop girl group trio—Lumi, Mira, and Joy—who moonlight as demon hunters behind the stage.Expectations were low before its release. In fact, close to zero.The premise—a Korean idol group created by a Japanese studio under American financing—reminded many of past Western attempts to mash up East Asian culture, often ending in failure.But once the film was released, the response was overwhelming.·        Charming character designs inspired by jakhodo art·        Detailed depictions of Korean food culture like ramen, gimbap, and hotteok·        An OST that captured the full spirit of K-pop·        Small cultural touches, like using tissue paper as a chopstick rest at restaurantsEven the subtlest details, instantly recognizable to Korean viewers, were faithfully portrayed.The result? Global fans praised it as “authentically Korean.”And the numbers followed:·        Ranked No. 1 globally in Netflix’s film category during its first week·        Hit No. 1 in 41 countries, including the US, Germany, and Thailand·        Dance moves from the film’s fictional idol group became real K-pop dance challengesThis led to a second wave of content spreading across platforms.Netflix and Sony were caught off guard by the success and scrambled to produce official merchandiseMeanwhile, a jakhodo-inspired badge from the National Museum of Korea sold out as an unofficial “fan good.”Nongshim Keeps Popping Up in K-Demon HuntersAs you watch the film, certain elements start to stand out.The spicy chips that lead character Joy eats look strikingly similar to Shrimp Crackers.The cup ramen eaten by Huntress members is branded “Dongshim” and features a large red character “Shin,” clearly reminiscent of Shin Ramyun. Even the instructions—“pour hot water and wait three minutes”—match the real product.Ahead of the film’s release, Netflix held a promotional event in New York City, handing out instant ramen to passersby.What makes this even more interesting is that Nongshim had no official PPL or sponsorship deal with K-pop Demon Hunters.The film’s global success has unintentionally delivered Nongshim a wave of free international exposure.K-Content? The Formula That Drives Real-World SalesThere have been past cases where K-content led directly to consumer spending.The 2020 Oscar-winning film Parasite is a prime example of K-content driving global consumption.The appearance of “Chapaguri” in the film caught international audiences by surprise. In the month following the film’s release, Nongshim’s overseas sales of Chapagetti more than doubled year over year, reaching approximately 1.5 million dollars.In March, BLACKPINK’s Jennie mentioned Banana Kick and Shrimp Crackers as her favorite snacks on The Jennifer Hudson Show. Just four days later, Nongshim’s market cap jumped by 260 billion KRW—an example of the “five-second magic” effect in action.This isn’t new. K-content has repeatedly influenced real consumer behavior abroad, translating into tangible gains in both revenue and stock price.K-pop Demon Hunters also features recurring elements that closely resemble Nongshim products, suggesting a similar ripple effect in global consumer markets may follow.Nongshim vs. Nongshim Holdings — Why the Real Play Is the Holding Company(This is Nongshim’s Instagram post from today, the 11th. Could it be hinting at a K-Demon Hunters collaboration?)Then why not just buy Nongshim directly? Why bother with Nongshim Holdings?Here’s why it matters.Recent momentum in the Korean stock market, fueled by this year’s amendment to the Commercial Act and the upcoming expansion of separate dividend taxation, has sparked a revaluation of low-PBR stocks. Holding companies have been leading that move.As the holding company of Nongshim, Nongshim Holdings reflects:·        The earnings and brand exposure benefits of Nongshim·        A currently low PBR·        A relatively high dividend yield·        And direct upside from policies aimed at improving holding company structuresThis is not just a case of “moving with the group.”Nongshim Holdings is a rare combination of undervaluation, dividend strength, and structure that aligns perfectly with what today’s market is rewarding most.In ClosingNetflix’s K-pop Demon Hunters delivered an unexpected global hit.Korean food products—especially Nongshim’s ramen and Shrimp Crackers—were naturally embedded in the content, building emotional familiarity and triggering consumer interest among international viewers.From Parasite in 2020, to Squid Game in 2021, and now K-pop Demon Hunters in 2025,K-content driving real-world consumption and stock price momentum is no longer a coincidence—it is a repeatable pattern.If you can’t invest in the content itself, why not ride the consumption trend it creates?Now is the time to take a closer look at Nongshim Holdings, the unexpected beneficiary.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
072710
Nongshim Holdings
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Charter Communications nears $55 billion deal for Time Warner Cable - sources(May 26, 2015)
article
Neutral
Neutral
CHTR
Charter Communications Class A
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Charter Communications nears $55 billion deal for Time Warner Cable - sources(May 26, 2015)
Time Warner Cable Inc is nearing an agreement to be acquired by smaller peer Charter Communications Inc for about $55 billion, combining the second and third largest U.S. cable operators, people familiar with the matter said on Monday.A deal would create a major rival to Comcast Corp, the biggest operator in the U.S. cable and broadband market, and marks a triumph for Charter, which was rejected by Time Warner Cable just last year.News of another potential merger comes as the traditional pay television industry faces stagnating growth and new competition from over-the-web rivals offering individual services, like Netflix, or packages of channels, such as Sony. A larger company in this sector could achieve greater economies of scale, including in negotiations with programmers.The cash-and-stock deal values Time Warner Cable at $195 per share, according to sources, and comes just one month after Comcast dropped its $45.2 billion merger agreement with Time Warner Cable, clinched in February 2014, over antitrust concerns.Time Warner Cable shares closed at $171.18 on Friday. That is up substantially from the day before the original Comcast deal was announced last year, when the shares closed at $135.31.A merger of Charter and Time Warner Cable, with other related deals, would eliminate one of the country's top Internet providers and control more than 20 percent of the broadband market, according to data from MoffettNathanson.The Comcast-Time Warner Cable deal rejected by regulators would have created a provider with roughly 40 percent of the U.S. high-speed Internet market.Charter hopes its deal for Time Warner Cable will be viewed more favorably by regulators. Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler reached out to the chief executives of the two companies last week to convey that the agency is not opposed to any and all cable deals, The Wall Street Journal reported. Any deal would be considered on its own merits, the paper quoted Wheeler as saying.
article
Neutral
Neutral
CHTR
Charter Communications Class A
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Netflix’s world has been turned upside down as stock plunges 35%(Apr 20, 2022)
article
Strong Sell
Strong Sell
NFLX
Netflix
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Netflix’s world has been turned upside down as stock plunges 35%(Apr 20, 2022)
 Call Eleven and Sheriff Hopper of “Stranger Things,” because Netflix’s world has been turned upside down.The company reported Tuesday that it lost subscribers for the first time in more than a decade. The news shocked Wall Street and sent shares plummeting 35% Wednesday morning, wiping out $50 billion in market cap. And this was after the company’s stock had dropped more than 40% year to date.Simply put, Netflix’s terrible 2022 has now become disastrous.Once bullish experts and analysts who viewed Netflix as the linchpin of a transforming entertainment industry are now concerned about its growth going forward. And they’re wondering what the future of the company — and all of streaming — might look like.“What worked until this point may not be working anymore,” Michael Nathanson, a media analyst at MoffettNathanson, told CNN Business. “The world’s changed.”The question for Netflix (NFLX) — once the untouchable king of streaming — has gone from “what’s next?” to “what now?”“How do they turn the ship around?”Netflix said Tuesday that it lost 200,000 subscribers in the first quarter of 2022. Now, 200,000 out of 221 million global subscriptions may seem like little more than a rounding error, but consider that the service was expected to add 2.5 million new users in the first three months of the year — a low bar that had already spooked investors in January.As if that wasn’t bad enough, Netflix said it expects to lose another 2 million in the current quarter.The company blames many factors for its subscriber exodus, including competition and widespread password sharing. In its letter to investors Tuesday, Netflix also pointed fingers at “macro factors” that are affecting many companies right now, such as “sluggish economic growth, increasing inflation, geopolitical events such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and some continued disruption from Covid.”Pulling out of Russia alone cost the company 700,000 subscribers, Netflix said. But even without that, the company still would’ve missed its own expectations by nearly 2 million.Zak Shaikh, vice president of programming at research-based media firm Magid, believes Netflix needs to answer two questions to change its current narrative: “How do they turn the ship around and start increasing subs again, and how do they generate more revenue per sub?”“I think it comes down — as it often does — to content,” Shaikh told CNN Business. “Netflix just has to remember what made it so special was that it had the type of content and volume of content you couldn’t get anywhere else. That’s the value proposition they need to return to.”But it’s not as easy as flipping a switch, no matter how many billions Netflix spends on courting big talent and funding spectacular productions. If making great content was easy, everyone would be doing it.“Spending more doesn’t equal hits,” Nathanson said. “Everyone’s spending more.”Another way Netflix could boost revenue: clamping down on password sharing.The company alluded to that Tuesday, saying it will focus more on “how best to monetize sharing” in terms of passwords. And last month Netflix said that over the last year, it’s been working on ways to “enable members who share outside their household to do so easily and securely, while also paying a bit more.”“While we won’t be able to monetize all of it right now, we believe it’s a large short- to mid-term opportunity,” the company said Tuesday.But making customers pay for the privilege of sharing their passwords could actually have a “negative impact” for the company, according to Nathanson. Netflix already raised prices earlier this year, and any additional costs could alienate its base, which is already strapped for cash because of the economy and a surplus of streaming options.“Is there going to be a spin down to cheaper plans and/or will the goodwill that Netflix has generated just go away?” Nathanson said.Stranger things are happeningAnother area that could help Netflix: advertising. CEO Reed Hastings has historically been strongly averse to adding commercials to the service. Not anymore.“Think of us as quite open to offering even lower prices with advertising,” Hastings said during Tuesday’s post-earnings call.Adding a cheaper advertising tier is already happening across the streaming marketplace. Disney, Hulu and HBO Max, which is owned by CNN’s parent company Warner Bros. Discovery, already offer such options.It makes sense for Netflix to eventually join them, Shaikh said.“We know that consumers don’t have a problem with advertising as long as it is cheaper and that there is a no-commercial option, too,” he said. “That said, with advertising comes certain content restrictions, and that’s something they may want to avoid. Ultimately, they need to ensure they have the content that consumers want, and then ensure they are monetizing that in the best way possible.”Netflix getting its groove back is not just important to the company and its investors, but also for all of streaming.The platform is synonymous with the industry, so if Netflix is struggling, that raises questions about streaming as a solid business model.On Wednesday morning shares for companies that have built much of their businesses around streaming, such as Disney, Roku (ROKU), Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount, were all down alongside Netflix.Netflix said Tuesday that it will continue to improve the service. And it remains at the top of a marketplace that is changing how people consume entertainment, so it still has that going for it.“This is just the reality check that is inevitable for an industry leader facing multiple new entrants to the marketplace,” Shaikh said.
article
Strong Sell
Strong Sell
NFLX
Netflix
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Largest Negative Price Reaction to Positive EPS Surprises Since 2011(May 20, 2022)
article
Sell
Sell
226490
Samsung KODEX KOSPI ETF
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
Largest Negative Price Reaction to Positive EPS Surprises Since 2011(May 20, 2022)
To date, 95% of the companies in the S&P 500 have reported earnings for the first quarter. Of these companies, 77% have reported actual EPS above the mean EPS estimate, which is equal to the five-year average of 77%. In aggregate, earnings have exceeded estimates by 4.7%, which is below the five-year average of 8.9%. Given this performance relative to analyst expectations, how has the market responded to positive and negative EPS surprises reported by S&P 500 companies during the Q1 earnings season?Negative Price Reactions to Positive EPS SurprisesTo date, S&P 500 companies that have reported a positive EPS surprise have seen a negative price reaction on average.Companies that have reported positive earnings surprises for Q1 2022 have seen an average price decrease of 0.5% two days before the earnings release through two days after the earnings release. This percentage decrease is well below the five-year average price increase of 0.8% during this same window for companies reporting positive earnings surprises.In fact, if this is the final percentage for the quarter, it will mark the largest average negative price reaction to positive EPS surprises reported by S&P 500 companies for a quarter since Q2 2011 (-2.1%).One example of a company that reported a positive EPS surprise in Q1 but witnessed a negative stock price reaction is Netflix. On April 19, the company reported actual EPS of $3.53 for Q1, which was well above the mean EPS estimate of $2.90. However, from April 15 to April 21, the stock price for Netflix decreased by 36.0% (to $218.22 from $341.13).Large Negative Price Reactions to Negative EPS SurprisesIn addition, S&P 500 companies that have reported negative EPS surprises have seen a much larger negative price reaction than average.Companies that have reported negative earnings surprises for Q1 2022 have seen an average price decrease of 5.4% two days before the earnings release through two days after the earnings release. This percentage decrease is much larger than the five-year average price decrease of 2.3% during this same window for companies reporting negative earnings surprises.In fact, if this is the final percentage for the quarter, it will mark the largest average negative price reaction to negative EPS surprises reported by S&P 500 companies for a quarter since Q2 2011 (-8.0%).One example of a company that reported a negative EPS surprise in Q1 and saw a substantial negative stock price reaction is Under Armour. On May 6, the company reported actual EPS of -$0.01 for Q1, which was below the mean EPS estimate of $0.04. From May 4 to May 10, the stock price for Under Armour decreased by 33.5% (to $9.59 from $14.42).Possible Explanations for the Overall Negative Price ReactionsWhy is the market not rewarding positive EPS surprises and punishing negative EPS surprises more than average?One factor may be that companies are beating estimates for Q1 2022 by a smaller margin than average compared to recent quarters. The earnings surprise percentage of 4.7% for Q1 is below both the five-year average of 8.9% and the 10-year average of 6.5%. If 4.7% is the final percentage for the quarter, it will mark the lowest earnings surprise percentage reported by the index since Q1 2020 (1.1%). Perhaps the market expected S&P 500 companies to report positive earnings surprises by similar margins as recent quarters.
article
Sell
Sell
226490
Samsung KODEX KOSPI ETF
user
박재훈투영인
·
5 months ago
0
0
Why this Time the Tech Bubble is Different(May 4, 2022)
article
Sell
Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
+3
user
박재훈투영인
·
5 months ago
0
0
Why this Time the Tech Bubble is Different(May 4, 2022)
We are in a stock market carnage. Pandemic darling stocks Zoom, Peloton, Carvana, and many other NASDAQ stocks have tumbled from their highs. FAANG + Microsoft stocks have lost close to $1.4 trillion of value due to the market meltdown in April. We are in a “tech bubble” but this time the bubble is different.Going back to 2001The 2000 and 2001 tech bubble was different than what we are seeing now. The early 2000s tech stock bubble happened mainly due to tech stock speculation mania. This was the time when the internet was created. Many visionaries rightfully saw the internet as the most important innovation since the industrial revolution (similar to how Bitcoin is now). Private (venture capital) and public market money poured into these internet companies. Investment banks paid analysts bonuses for pumping up buy ratings of worthless doc com businesses to get more business from these companies. In 2000, at the height of the tech stock boom, NASDAQ IPOs raised $54 billion. This was an all-time high. Between 1995 and 2001, 439 dot-com businesses went public. During the 4th quarter of 1999, an average of $160 million was invested in private tech companies per day. Of course, all good things must come to an end. As you can see below, the speculation mania ended as the NASDAQ reached new highs on March 10th, 2002 (reaching 5048.62 points). The NASDAQ hits its low on October 9th, 2002. This decimated valuations of so many tech companies and bankrupted so many dot com businesses. But of course, from the crash came some of the most valuable companies in the world like Amazon, Alphabet (Google), and Meta (formerly Facebook), which happen to be technology companies.Now Let’s Come Back to 2022If the early 2000s tech bubble was an investor led mania, the 2010s and early 2020s stock market boom is a monetary policy created mania. Zero % interest rates, cheap money, and money printing has been a boon for assets. Just see below growth of financial asset value relative to US GDP (courtesy: St. Louis Fed FRED).Also, shown below is Federal Reserve M2 Money Printing correlated to the US stock market growth (courtesy: Man Yin To | Seeking Alpha Contributor).Easy money and record low interest rates (while the average joe pay high credit card and student loan interest rates) has inflated asset values. Cheap money and low interest rates have made investors searching high return returns. This has led money to flow into commercial real estate, single family homes, tech startups, mortgage backed securities, commercial mortgage backed securities, and the stock market. Also, the rise of passive investing and ETFs (like Vanguard) have made money from individual investors and retirement accounts to flow into blue chip US stocks.Overall, the Fed is stuck in a rock and a hard place. Years of low interest rates and money printing has created the greatest asset bubble in history. Now the world is seeing unpresented inflation. If the Fed raise rates 8–9 times as the Fed has planned, expect a recession and financial markets to collapse. This was probably tolerable in the 70s, early 2000s, and even 2008. But now the US is heavily financialized. So many retirement accounts are going to lose value by almost half. Wall Street does not want the music to stop and the Fed knows this fact. But the Fed also does not want inflation to run amuck. This is also a crucial year for the US given that the country is having its Midterm elections. Majority of Americans disapprove or President Biden’s actions, which signals bad news for the Democratic Party, which holds majority in both the US House of Representatives and Senate. On a recent podcast, Morgan Creek’s capital Mark Yusko mentioned that the we’ll be lucky to have 3 fed rate hikes. I echo Mark’s sentiment. The fed wants to fight inflation while not rocking the boat. In this case, the Fed is going to tread very carefully.Overall, the decade of the 2010s is going to be mainly defied by money printing and the rise of Web 2.0. But we are already seeing the cracks. Tech stocks, including the FAANGs, are in free fall. One of the most respected tech investors, Chase Coleman of Tiger Global, has lost 44% YTD. Cathie Wood’s signature Ark Invest ETF is down nearly 40% YTD. But the worst is yet to come. Food inflation is at an all-time high. We are also seeing many sovereign nations lose faith in the US Dollar and de-dollarization is accelerating. With more rate hikes by the Fed to control inflation expect a harsher reaction from financial markets. I do not have a crystal ball to predict what will happen in the future. But what is known for sure is that global uncertainty and risk will only increase. We are still in for some pain.But with pain comes opportunity. Now is the time to go bargain hunting on some really good investments (as we have mentioned here, here, here, here, and here). After the tech bubble burst, some of the most valuable and important companies like Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, and Google came from the tech space. This is while useless “dot-com” companies with no sales went bust. Also similar to the last tech bubble, we are witnessing the birth of the new technology and asset class: Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin and crypto are going to create the next wave of finance and decentralized applications. As investors are seeking places to allocate their capital, expect more money to go into crypto. Same can be true for commodities, climate change technology, and emerging market equities. Useless companies that went up thanks to money printing are just going to collapse and go bankrupt. Strong emerging tech companies are going to be the next billion- and trillion-dollar companies. As this “everything bubble” bursts, expect some gems to rise up from the ashes.
article
Sell
Sell
133690
Mirae Asset TIGER NASDAQ100 ETF
+3
Economy & Strategy
user
셀스마트 자민
·
4 months ago
0
0
Wall Street’s Squid Game: Korean retail investors Playing with Fire (25.03.15)
article
Neutral
Neutral
NONE
No Relevant Stock
user
셀스마트 자민
·
4 months ago
0
0
Wall Street’s Squid Game: Korean retail investors Playing with Fire (25.03.15)
The extreme volatility in certain U.S. stocks and leveraged ETFs has recently been linked to the influence of Korean retail investors. Owen Lamont, Senior Vice President at Arcadian Asset Management, has warned that the U.S. market is increasingly being shaped by Korean-style investing, comparing it to the high-risk survival game in Netflix’s Squid Game.Lamont noted that while Korean investors account for just 0.2% of total U.S. market capitalization, they disproportionately impact niche sectors, driving wild price swings in speculative assets. In particular, their heavy concentration in thematic stocks—regardless of intrinsic value—has fueled excessive surges and crashes.He also pointed out a peculiar pattern among Korean investors: they tend to pile into stocks right before a crash. As an example, he cited the 2008 Lehman Brothers collapse, when Korean investors increased their purchases of the doomed company’s shares even as its financial instability became apparent. Lamont compared this behavior to historical cases such as Japanese retail investors in 1989 and growth fund investors in 1999, both of whom became emblematic of poor market timing before major downturns.Lamont emphasized that such high-risk, speculative investments often lead to devastating losses for most participants. He urged investors to avoid getting caught up in a Squid Game-style trading frenzy, where the vast majority end up losing.[Compliance Note]All posts by Sellsmart are for informational purposes only. Final investment decisions should be made with careful judgment and at the investor’s own risk.The content of this post may be inaccurate, and any profits or losses resulting from trades are solely the responsibility of the investor.Core16 may hold positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and may buy or sell them at any time.
article
Neutral
Neutral
NONE
No Relevant Stock
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
When Is the Best Time to Sell Stocks? (Feb 02, 2025)
article
Neutral
Neutral
NONE
No Relevant Stock
user
박재훈투영인
·
4 months ago
0
0
When Is the Best Time to Sell Stocks? (Feb 02, 2025)
Proven Principles for Stock Sell TimingKey Selling Principles:Defensive Selling Rules: Limiting Losses7–8% Stop-Loss Rule: Sell immediately if a stock falls 7–8% from the purchase price.This rule is based on over 130 years of stock market history, which shows that even the best stocks rarely drop more than 8% from their entry point.Capital preservation is paramount—"Sell first, ask questions later."If a stock falls more than 8%, it signals that there may be issues with the purchase timing, the company, the industry, or the overall market.Aggressive Selling Rules: Realizing Gains20–25% Profit-Taking Rule: Sell all or part of your position if the stock rises by 20–25% from an optimal buy point.It is best to sell in a rising, bullish market.Growth stocks typically surge 20–25% following a breakout from a favorable chart pattern before undergoing a pullback.The "72 Rule" applies: achieving 24% gains compounded three times doubles your capital.Exception: The 8-Week Holding RuleIf a stock surges more than 20% within three weeks of a breakout, hold it for at least eight weeks.Stocks with the strength to quickly rise over 20% may have the potential to become market leaders, so this rule should be applied only to true market leaders.While significant adjustments may occur during these eight weeks, you must weather the volatility.After eight weeks, you may then choose to either realize gains or continue holding.Considerations When Deciding to Sell:Assess overall market trends.In weaker markets, consider triggering stop-losses even at 3–5% declines.Calculate profit-taking based on your ideal buy point.Always prioritize capital preservation.Examples from Leading Companies:Even top growth stocks like Apple (AAPL), Nvidia (NVDA), Alphabet (GOOGL), Netflix (NFLX), and Amazon (AMZN) have experienced steep declines. Timing your exit well is critical to protecting gains.These principles are proven methods for limiting losses and locking in profits in stock investing, thereby safeguarding your portfolio and enabling long-term success.
article
Neutral
Neutral
NONE
No Relevant Stock